Theosophy
A MODERN REVIVAL OF
ANCIENT WISDOM
Alvin Boyd Kuhn
Electronically typed and edited by
Juan Schoch for educational research purposes. I can be contacted at pc93@bellsouth.net. I will be greatly indebted to the
individual who can put me in touch with the Estate of Dr. Alvin Boyd Kuhn
and/or any of the following works:
The Mighty Symbol of the Horizon,
Nature as Symbol, The Tree of Knowledge, The Rebellion of the Angels, The Ark
and the Deluge, The True Meaning of Genesis, The Law of the Two Truths, At
Sixes and Sevens, Adam Old and New, The Real and the Actual, Immortality: Yes -
But How?, The Mummy Speaks at Last, Symbolism of the Four Elements, Through
Science to Religion, Creation in Six Days?, Rudolph Steiner's "Mystery of
Golgotha", Krishnamurti and Theosophy, A. B. Kuhn's graduation address at
Chambersburg Academy "The Lyre of Orpheus", A. B. Kuhn's unpublished
autobiography, Great Pan Returns.
STUDIES IN RELIGION AND CULTURE
AMERICAN RELIGION SERIES II
THEOSOPHY
PREFACE
Since this work was designed to be one of a series of studies in American
religions, the treatment of the subject was consciously limited to those
aspects of Theosophy which are in some manner distinctively related to
The author wises to express his obligation to several persons without whose
assistance the enterprise would have been more onerous and less successful. His
thanks are due in largest measure to Professor Roy F. Mitchell of New York
University, and to Mrs. Mitchell, for placing at his disposal much of their
time and of their wide knowledge of Theosophical material; to Mr. L. W. Rogers,
President of the American Theosophical Society, Wheaton, Illinois, for cordial
vii
co-operation in the matter of the questionnaire, and to the many members of the
Society who took pains to reply to the questions; to Mr. John Garrigues, of the
United Lodge of Theosophists, New York, for valuable data out of his great
store of Theosophic information, and to several of the ladies at the U.L.T.
Reading Room for library assistance; to Professor Louis H. Gray, of Columbia
University, for technical criticism in Sanskrit terminology; to Mr. Arthur E.
Christy, of Columbia University, for data showing Emerson's indebtedness to Oriental
philosophy; and to Professor Herbert W. Schneider, of Columbia University, for
his painstaking criticism of the study throughout.
A. B. K.
September, 1930
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
|
I. THEOSOPHY, AN ANCIENT TRADITION . . . . . . |
1 |
|
II. THE AMERICAN BACKGROUND OF THEOSOPHY . . . . |
18 |
|
III. HELENA P. BLAVATSKY: HER LIFE AND PSYCHIC |
|
|
CAREER . . . . . . . . . . . . |
43 |
|
IV. FROM SPIRITUALISM TO THEOSOPHY . . . . . . |
89 |
|
V. |
115 |
|
VI. THE MAHATMAS AND THEIR LETTERS . . . . . . |
147 |
|
VII. STORM, WRECK, AND REBUILDING . . . . . . |
176 |
|
VIII. THE SECRET DOCTRINE . . . . . . . . . |
194 |
|
IX. EVOLUTION, REBIRTH, AND KARMA . . . . . . |
232 |
|
X. ESOTERIC WISDOM AND PHYSICAL SCIENCE . . . . |
253 |
|
XI. THEOSOPHY IN ETHICAL PRACTICE . . . . . . |
265 |
|
XII. LATER THEOSOPHICAL HISTORY . . . . . . . |
301 |
|
XIII. SOME FACTS AND FIGURES . . . . . . . . |
341 |
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . |
351 |
|
INDEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
375 |
ix
(blank)
x
THEOSOPHY
CHAPTER I
In the mind of the general public Theosophy is classed with Spiritualism, New
Thought, Unity and Christian Science, as one of the modern cults. It needs but
a slight acquaintance with the facts in the case to reveal that Theosophy is
amenable to this classification only in the most superficial sense. Though the
Theosophical Society is recent, theosophy, in the sense of an esoteric
philosophic mystic system of religious thought, must be ranked as one of the
most ancient traditions. It is not a mere cult, in the sense of being the
expression of a quite specialized form of devotion, practice, or theory,
propagated by a small group. It is a summation and synthesis of many cults of
all times. It is as broad and universal a motif, let us say, as mysticism. It
is one of the most permanent phases of religion, and as such it has welled up
again and again in the life of mankind. It is that "wisdom of the
divine" which has been in the world practically continuously since ancient
times. The movement of today is but another periodical recurrence of a
phenomenon which has marked the course of history from classical antiquity. Not
always visible in outward organization--indeed never formally organized as
Theosophy under that name until now--the thread of theosophic teaching and
temperament can be traced in almost unbroken course from ancient times to the
present. It has often been subterranean, inasmuch as esotericism and secrecy
have been essential elements of its very constitution. The modern presentation
of theosophy differs from all the past ones chiefly in that it has lifted the veil
that cloaked its teachings in mystery, and offered alleged secrets freely to
the world. Theosophists tell
1
us that before the launching of the latest "drive" to promulgate
Theosophy in the world, the councils of the Great White Brotherhood of Adepts,
or Mahatmas, long debated whether the times were ripe for the free propagation
of the secret Gnosis; whether the modern world, with its Western dominance and
with the prevalence of materialistic standards, could appropriate the sacred
knowledge without the risk of serious misuse of high spiritual forces, which
might be diverted into selfish channels. We are told that in these councils it
was the majority opinion that broadcasting the Ancient Wisdom over the
Occidental areas would be a veritable casting of pearls before swine; yet two
of the Mahatmas settled the question by undertaking to assume all karmic debts
for the move, to take the responsibility for all possible disturbances and ill
effects.
If we look at the matter through Theosophic eyes, we are led to believe that
when in the fall of 1875 Madame Blavatsky, Col. H. S. Olcott, and Mr. W. Q.
Judge took out the charter for the Theosophical Society in
To understand the periodical recurrence of the theosophic tendency in history
it is necessary to note two cardinal features of the Theosophic theory of
development. The first is that progress in religion, philosophy, science, or
art is not a direct advance, but in advance in cyclical swirls. When you view
progress in small sections, it may appear to be a development in a straight
line; but if your gaze takes in the
2
whole course of history, you will see the outline of a quite different method
of progress. You will not see uninterrupted unfolding of human life, but
advances and retreats, plunges and recessions. Spring does not emerge from
winter by a steady rise of temperature, but by successive rushes of heat, each
carrying the season a bit ahead. Movement in nature is cyclical and periodic.
History progresses through the rise and fall of nations. The true symbol of
progress is the helix, motion round and round, but tending upward at each
swirl. But we must have large perspectives if we are to see the gyrations of
the helix.
The application of this interpretation of progress to philosophy and religion
is this: the evolution of ideas apparently repeats itself at intervals time after
time, a closed circuit of theories running through the same succession at many
points in history. Scholars have discerned this fact in regard to the various
types of government: monarchy working over into oligarchy, which shifts to
democracy, out of which monarchy arises again. The round has also been observed
in the domain of philosophy, where development starts with revelation and
proceeds through rationalism to empiricism, and, in revulsion from that, swings
back to authority or mystic revelation once more. Hegel's theory that progress
was not in a straight line but in cycles formed by the manifestation of thesis,
antithesis, and then synthesis, which in turn becomes the ground of a new
thesis, is but a variation of this general theme.
Theosophists, then, regard their movement as but the renaissance of the
esoteric and occult aspect of human thought in this particular swing of the
spiral.
The second aspect of the occult theory of development is a method of
interpretation which claims to furnish a key to the understanding of religious
history. Briefly, the theory is that religions never evolve; they always
degenerate. Contrary to the assumptions of comparative mythology, they do not
originate in crude primitive feelings or ideas, and then transform themselves
slowly into loftier and purer ones. They begin lofty and pure, and deteriorate
into crasser
3
forms. They come forth in the glow of spirituality and living power and later
pass into empty forms and lifeless practices. From the might of the spirit they
contract into the materialism of the letter. No religion can rise above its
source, can surpass its founder; and the more exalted the founder and his
message, the more certainly is degeneration to be looked for. There is always
gradual change in the direction of obscuration and loss of primal vision,
initial force. Religions tend constantly to wane, and need repeated revivals
and reformations. Nowhere is it possible to discern anything remotely like
steady growth in spiritual unfolding.
It is the occult theory that what we find when we search the many religions of
the earth is but the fragments, the dissociated and distorted units of what
were once profound and coherent systems. It is difficult to trace in the
isolated remnants the contour of the original structure. But it is this
completed system which the Theosophist seeks to reconstruct from the scattered
remnants.
Religion, then, is a phase of human life which is alleged to operate on a
principle exactly opposite to evolution, and theosophy believes this key makes
it intelligible. Religions never claim to have evolved from human society; they
claim to be gifts to humanity. They come to man with the seal of some divine
authority and the stamp of supreme perfection. Not only are they born above the
world, but they are brought to the world by the embodied divinity of a great
Messenger, a Savior, a World-Teacher, a Prophet, a Sage, a Son of God. These
bring their own credentials in the form of a divine life. Their words and works
bespeak the glory that earth can not engender.
The two phases of theosophic explanation can now be linked into a unified
principle. Religions come periodically; and they are given to men from high
sources, by supermen. The theory of growth from crude beginnings to
spirituality tacitly assumes that man is alone in the universe and left
entirely to his own devices; that he must learn everything for himself from
experience, which somehow enlarges his
4
faculties and quickens them for higher conceptions. This view, says occultism, does
unnatural violence to the fundamental economy of the universe, wrenching
humanity out of its proper setting and relationship in an order of harmony and
fitness. Humankind is made to be the sole manipulator of intelligence, the
favored beneficiary of evolution, and as such is severed from its natural
connection with the rest of the cosmic scheme. So small and poor a view does
pitiable injustice to the wealth of the cosmic resources. Bruno, Copernicus,
and modern science have taught us that man is not the darling of creation, nor
the only child in the cosmic family, the pampered ward of the gods. Far from
it; he is one among the order of beings, occupying his proper place in relation
to vaster hierarchies than he has knowledge of, above and below him.1
What is the character of that relationship? It is, says the esoteric teaching,
that of guardian and ward; of a young race in the tutelage of an older; of
infant humanity being taught by more highly evolved beings, whose intelligence
is to that of early man as an adept's to a tyro's. It is the relationship of
children to parents or guardians. Throughout our history we have been the wards
of an elder race, or at least of the elder brothers of our own race. The
members of a former evolutionary school have turned back often, like the
guardians in Plato's cave allegory, to instruct us in vital knowledge. The
wisdom of the ages, the knowledge of the very Ancient of Days, has at times
been handed down to us. The human family has produced some advanced Sages,
Seers, Adepts, Christs, and these have cared for the less-advanced classes, and
have from time to time given out a body of deeper wisdom than man's own.
Theosophy claims that it
______________
1 The same idea is voiced by William James (Pragmatism, p. 299): "I
thoroughly disbelieve, myself, that our human experience is the highest form of
experience extant in the universe. I believe rather that we stand in much the
same relation to the whole of the universe as our canine and feline pets do to
the whole of human life. They inhabit our drawing rooms and libraries. They
take part in scenes of whose significance they have no inkling. They are merely
tangent to curves of history, the beginnings and ends and forms of which pass
wholly beyond their ken. So we are tangent to the wider life of things."
5
is the traditional memory of these noble characters, their lives and messages,
which has left the ancient field strewn with the legends of its Gods, Kings,
Magi, Rishis, Avatars and its great semi-divine heroes. Such wisdom and
knowledge as they could wisely and safely impart they have handed down, either
coming themselves to earth from more ethereal realms, or commissioning
competent representatives. And thus the world has periodically been given the
boon of a new religion and a new stimulus from the earthly presence of a savior
regarded as divine. And always the gospel contained milk for the babes and meat
for grown men. There was both an exoteric and an esoteric doctrine. The former
was broadcast among the masses, and did its proper and salutary work for them;
the latter, however, was imparted only to the fit and disciplined initiates in
secret organizations. Much real truth was hidden behind the veil of allegory;
myth and symbol were employed. This aggregate of precious knowledge, this
innermost heart of the secret teaching of the gods to mankind, is, needless to
say, the Ancient Wisdom--is Theosophy. Or at least Theosophy claims the key to
all this body of wisdom. It has always been in the world, but never publicly
promulgated until now.
To trace the currents of esoteric influence in ancient religious literature
would be the work of volumes. Theosophic or kindred doctrines are to be found
in a large number of the world's sacred books or bibles. The lore of
Philosophy, not less than religion, bears the stamp of theosophical ideology.
Traces of the occult doctrine permeate most of the thought systems of the past.
All histories of philosophy in the western world begin, with or without brief
apology to the venerable systems of the Orient, with Thales of Miletus and the
early Greek thinkers of about the sixth century B.C. In the dim background
stand Homer and Hesiod and Pindar and the myths of the Olympian pantheon.
Contemporary religious faiths, too, such as the cult of
6
Pythagoreanism,2 and the Orphic and Eleusinian Mysteries, influenced
philosophical speculation.
It needs no extraordinary erudition to trace the stream of esoteric teaching
through the field of Greek philosophy. What is really surprising is that the
world of modern scholarship should have so long assumed that Greek speculation
developed without reference to the wide-spread religious cult systems which
transfused the thought of the near-Eastern nations. Esotericism was an
ingrained characteristic of the Oriental mind and
Thales' fragments contain Theosophical ideas in his identification of the physis
with the soul of the universe, and in his affirmation that "the
materiality of physis is supersensible." Thales thought that this physis
or natural world was "full of gods."4 Both these conceptions of
the impersonal and the personal physis, the latter a reasoning substance
approaching Nous, came out of the continuum of the group soul, as a
vehicle of magic power.5 Man was believed to stand in a sympathetic relation to
this nature or physis, and the deepening of his sympathetic attitude was
supposed to give him nothing less than magical control over its elements.
Prominent among the Orphic tenets was that of reincarnation, possibly a
transference to man of the annual rebirth
______________
2 See in particular such works as From Religion to Philosophy, by F. M.
Cornford (London, 1912), and From Orpheus to Paul, by Prof. Vittorio D.
Macchioro (New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1930).
3 "The work of philosophy thus appears as an elucidation and clarifying of
religious material. It does not create its new conceptual tools; it rather
discovers them by ever subtler analysis and closer definition of the elements
confused in the original datum."--From Religion to Philosophy, by
F. M. Cornford, p. 126.
4 Ibid., pp. 94 ff.
5 "Physis was not an object, but a metaphysical substance. It differs
from modern ether in being thought actual. It is important to notice that Greek
speculation was not based on observation of external nature. It is more easily
understood as an echo from the Orphic teachings."--Ibid., pp. 136
ff.
7
in nature. Worship of heavenly bodies as aiding periodical harvests found a
place here also.6 The conception of the wheel of Dike and Moira, the allotted
flow and apportionment in time as well as place, of all things, nature and man
together, was underlying in the ancient Greek mind. Persian occult ideas may
have influenced the Orphic systems.7
Anaximander added to the scientific doctrines of Thales the idea of
compensatory retribution for the transgression of Moira's bounds which suggests
Karma. The sum of Heraclitus' teaching is the One Soul of the universe, in
ever-running cycles of expression-"Fire8 lives the death of air, air lives
the death of fire; earth lives the death of water, water lives the death of
earth."9 And interwoven with it is a sort of justice which resembles
karmic force.10
Dionysiac influence brought the theme of reincarnation prominently to the fore
in metaphysical thinking.11
Socrates, in the Phaedo, speaks of "the ancient doctrine that souls
pass out of this world to the other, and there exist, and then come back hither
from the dead, and are born again." In Hesiod's Works and Days
there is the image of the Wheel of Life. In the mystical tradition there was
prominent the wide-spread notion of a fall of higher forms of life into the
human sphere of limitation and misery. The Orphics definitely taught that the
soul of man fell from the stars into the prison of this earthly body, sinking
from the upper regions of fire and light into the misty darkness of this dismal
vale. The fall is ascribed to some original sin, which
______________
6 "The fate of man was sympathetically related to the circling lights of
heaven."--Ibid., p. 171.
7 Ibid., pp. 176 ff.
8 The universal soul substance.
9 Quoted by F. M. Cornford, From Religion to Philosophy, p. 185.
10 For the Orphic origin of Heraclitus' philosophy consult From Orpheus to
Paul, by Prof. Vittorio D. Macchioro, pp. 169 ff.
11 "The most primitive of these (cardinal doctrines of mysticism) is
Reincarnation (palingenesis). This life, which is perpetually renewed, is
reborn out of that opposite state called 'death,' into which, at the other end
of its arc, it passes again. In this idea of Reincarnation . . . we have the
first conception of a cycle of existence, a Wheel of Life, divided into two
hemicycles of light and darkness, through which the one life, or soul,
continuously revolves."--From Religion to Philosophy, p. 160.
8
entailed expulsion from the purity and perfection of divine existence and had
to be expiated by life on earth and by purgation in the nether world.12
The philosophies of Parmenides, Empedocles, and Plato came directly out of the
Pythagorean movement.13 Aristotle described Empedocles' poems as
"Esoteric," and it is thought that Parmenides' poems were similarly
so. Parmenides' theory that the earth is the plane of life outermost, most
remotely descended from God, is re-echoed in theosophic schematism. Also his
idea--"The downward fall of life from the heavenly fires is countered by
an upward impulse which 'sends the soul back from the seen to the
unseen'"--completes the Theosophic picture of outgoing and return.
Parmenides "was really the 'associate' of a Pythagorean, Ameinias, son of
Diochartas, a poor but noble man, to whom he afterwards built a shrine, as to a
hero."14 "Strabo describes Parmenides and Zeno as
Pythagoreans."15 Cornford's comment on the philosophy of Empedocles leaves
little doubt as to its origin in the Mysteries.16 Strife causes the fall, love
brings the return.
______________
12 "Caught in the wheel of birth, the soul passes through the forms of man
and beast and plant."--From Religion to Philosophy, p. 178.
13 From Religion to Philosophy, p. 197. Also From Orpheus to Paul,
Chapter VIII.
14 John Burnet, Early Greek Philosophy (
15 Ibid., p. 156.
16 "That the doctrine (exile of the soul from God) . . . was not invented
by Empedocles is certain from the fact that the essential features of it are
found in Pindar's second Olympian, written for Theron of Acragas, where
Empedocles was born, at a date when Empedocles was a boy. Throughout the course
of that majestic Ode revolves the Wheel of Time, Destiny and Judgment. The
doctrine can be classed unhesitatingly as 'Orphic.' The soul is conceived as
falling from the region of light down into the 'roofed-in cave,' the 'dark
meadow of Ate.' (Frag. 119, 120, 121.) This fall is a penalty for sin,
flesh-eating or oath-breaking. Caught in the Wheel of Time, the soul,
preserving its individual identity, passes through all shapes of life. This
implies that man's soul is not 'human'; human life is only one of the shapes it
passes through. Its substance is divine and immutable, and it is the same
substance as all other soul in the world. In this sense the unity of all life
is maintained; but, on the other hand, each soul is an atomic individual, which
persists throughout its ten thousand years' cycle of reincarnations. The soul
travels the round of the four elements: 'For I have been ere now, a body, and a
girl, a bush (earth), a bird (air) and a dumb fish in the sea.' (Frag. 117.)
These four elements compose the bodies which it successively inhabits.
"The soul is further called 'an exile from God' and a wanderer, and its
offence,
9
Empedocles was a member of a Pythagorean society or school, for Diogenes tells
us that he and Plato were expelled from the organization for having revealed
the secret teachings.17
Of Pythagoras as a Theosophic type of philosopher there is no need to speak at
any length. What is known of Pythagoreanism strongly resembles Theosophy.
As to Socrates, it is interesting to note that Cornford's argument "points
to the conclusion that Socrates was more familiar with Pythagorean ideas than
has commonly been supposed."18 Socrates gave utterance to many Pythagorean
sentiments and he was associated with members of the Pythagorean community at
Phlious, near
R. D. Hicks comments on Plato's "imaginative sympathy with the whole mass
of floating legend, myth and dogma, of a partly religious, partly ethical
character, which found a wide, but not universal acceptance, at an early time
in the Orphic and Pythagorean associations and brotherhoods."19
"The Platonic myths afford ample evidence that Plato was perfectly
familiar with all the leading features of this strange creed. The divine origin
of the soul, its fall from bliss and the society of the gods, its long
pilgrimage of penance through hundreds of generations, its task of purification
from earthly pollution, its
______________
which entailed this exile, is described as 'following Strife,' 'putting trust
in Strife.' At the end of the cycle of births, men may hope to 'appear among
mortals as prophets, song-writers, physicians and princes; and thence they rise
up, as gods exalted in honor, sharing the hearth of the other immortals and the
same table, free from human woes, delivered from destiny and harm.' (Frags.
146, 147.) Thus the course of the soul begins with separation from God, and
ends in reunion with him, after passing through all the moirai of the
elements."--From Religion to Philosophy, p. 228.
17 By comparison with the passage expounding Empedocles' theory of rebirth
(supra), the following assumes significance: "From these (Golden Verses
of Pythagoras) we learn that it had some striking resemblance to the
beliefs prevalent in
18 From Religion to Philosophy, p. 247.
19 R. D. Hicks: Introduction to Aristotle's De Anima, (
10
reincarnation in successive bodies, its upward and downward progress, and the
law of retribution for all offences . . ."20
There is evidence pointing to the fact that Plato was quite familiar with the
Mystery teachings, if not actually an initiate.21 In the Phaedrus he
says:
". . . being initiated into those Mysteries which it is lawful to call the
most blessed of all Mysteries . . . we were freed from the molestation of evils
which otherwise await us in a future period of time. Likewise in consequence of
this divine initiation, we become spectators of entire, simple, immovable and
blessed visions resident in the pure light."22
And his immersion in the prevalent esoteric attitude is hinted at in another
passage:
"You say that, in my former discourse, I have not sufficiently explained
to you the nature of the First. I purposely spoke enigmatically, for in case
the tablet should have happened with any accident, either by land or sea, a
person, without some previous knowledge of the subject, might not be able to
understand its contents."23
______________
20 Ibid. "It is now generally agreed that we may distinguish a
group of early dialogues commonly called 'Socratic' from a larger group in
which the doctrines characteristic of Orphism and Pythagoreanism for the first
time make their appearance"--From Religion to Philosophy, p. 242.
"Thus, the Megarian and Eleatic doctrines, though they had not satisfied
him, had impelled Plato to look for a point of union of the One and the Many;
but he was enabled to find it only by a more thorough acquaintance with the
Pythagoreans. It is only after his return from
21 "Constantly perfecting himself in perfect Mysteries, a man in them
alone becomes truly perfect, says he in the Phaedrus."--Isaac
22 This passage, from Cory's Ancient Fragments, is in a translation
somewhat different from that of Jowett and other editors, though Jowett (Plato's
Works, Vol. I, Phaedrus, p. 450) gives the following: ". . .
and he who has part in this gift, and is truly possessed and duly out of his
mind, is by the use of purifications and mysteries made whole and exempt from
evil. . . ." The term "pure light" appears to be a reference to
the Astral Light, or Akasha, of the Theosophists. For this term, Astral Light,
Madame Blavatsky gives in the Theosophical Glossary the following
definition: "A subtle essence visible only to the clairvoyant eye, and the
lowest but one (viz., the earth) of the Seven Akashic or Kosmic
principles." She further says that it corresponds to the astral body in
man.
23
11
Aristotle left the esoteric tradition, and went in the direction of naturalism
and empiricism. Yet in him too there are many points of distinctly esoteric
ideology. His distinction between the vegetative animal soul and the rational
soul, the latter alone surviving while the former perished; his dualism of
heavenly and terrestrial life; his belief that the heavenly bodies were great
living beings among the hierarchies; and his theory that development is the
passing of potentiality over into actualization, are all items of Theosophic
belief.
Greek philosophy is said to have ended with Neo-Platonism--which is one of
history's greatest waves of the esoteric tendency. It would be a long task to
detail the theosophic ideas of the great Plotinus. He, Origen and Herrennius
were pupils of Ammonius Saccas, whose teachings they promised never to reveal,
as being occult. Plotinus' own teachings were given only to initiated circles
of students.24 Proclus25 gives astonishing corroboration to a fragment of
Theosophic doctrine in any excerpt quoted in Isis Unveiled:
"After death, the soul (the spirit) continueth to linger in the aerial
(astral) form till it is entirely purified from all angry and voluptuous
passions . . . then doth it put off by a second dying the aerial body as it did
the earthly one. Whereupon the ancients say that there is a celestial body
always joined with the soul, and which is immortal, luminous and
star-like."26
The esotericist feels that the evidence, a meagre portion of which has been
thus cursorily submitted, is highly indica-
______________
24 Porphyry: Life of Plotinus, in the Introduction to Vol. I, of the Works
of Plotinus, edited by Dr. Kenneth S. Guthrie.
25 "Proclus maintained that the philosophical doctrines (chiefly
Platonism) are of the same content as the mystic revelations, that philosophy
in fact borrowed from the Mysteries, from Orphism, through Pythagoras, from
whom Plato borrowed."--Samuel Angus: The Mystery Religions and
Christianity (London, J. Murray, 1925), p. 267.
26 Quoted by Madame Blavatsky in
12
tive that beneath the surface of ancient pagan civilization there were
undercurrents of sacred wisdom, esoteric traditions of high knowledge,
descended from revered sources, and really cherished in secret.
Presumably the Christian religion itself drew many of its basic concepts
directly or indirectly from esoteric sources. It was born amid the various
cults and faiths that then occupied the field of the Alexandrian East and the
Christianity grew up in the milieu of the Mysteries,27 and those early Fathers
who formulated the body of Christian doctrine did not step drastically outside
the traditions of the prevalent faiths. Their work was rather an incorporation
of some new elements into the accepted systems of the time. In some cases, as
in
______________
27 "For over a thousand years the ancient Mediterranean world was familiar
with a type of religion known as Mystery-Religions, which changed the religious
outlook of the Western world and which are operative in European philosophy and
in the Christian Church to this day. Dean Inge, in his Christian Mysticism,
p. 354, says that Catholicism owes to the Mysteries . . . the notions of
secrecy, of symbolism, of mystical brotherhood, of sacramental grace, and above
all, of the three stages of the spiritual life; ascetic purification,
illumination and epopteia as the crown."--Samuel Angus: The
Mystery Religions and Christianity: Foreword.
13
blended, for many Christians in the Egyptian city were at the same time
connected with the Mystery cult of Serapis, as many in
When in the third and fourth centuries the Church Fathers began the task of
shaping a body of doctrine for the new movement, the same theosophic tendencies
pressed upon them from every side. Clement and Origen brought many phases of
theosophic doctrine to prominence, a fact which tended later to exclude their
writings from the canon. And when Augustine drew up the dogmatic schematism of
the new religion, he was tremendously swayed by the work of the Neo-Platonist
Plotinus, who, along with Ammonius Saccas, Numenius, Porphyry, and Proclus, had
been a member of one or several of the Mystery bodies.31
The presence of powerful currents of Neo-Platonic idealism in the early church
is attested by the effects upon it of Manichaeism, Gnosticism and the Antioch
heresy, which tendencies had to be exterminated before Christianity definitely
took its course of orthodox development. Occult
______________
28 See argument in Dr. Annie Besant's Esoteric Christianity (
29 See Samuel Angus: The Mystery Religions and Christianity; and H. A.
A. Kennedy:
30 As in 2 Corinthians, XII, 1-5.
31 "Plotinus, read in a Latin translation, was the schoolmaster who
brought Augustine to Christ. There is therefore nothing startling in the considered
opinion of Rudolph Eucken that Plotinus has influenced Christian theology more
than any other thinker."--Dean R. W. Inge: The Philosophy of Plotinus
(New York, London, 1918), Vol. I.
14
writers32 have indicated the forces at work in the formative period of the
church's dogma which eradicated the theory of reincarnation and other aspects
of esoteric knowledge from the orthodox canons. The point remains true,
nevertheless, that Christianity took its rise in an atmosphere saturated with
ideas resembling those of Theosophy.
Theosophy, the Gnosis, having been to a large extant rejected from Catholic
theology, nevertheless did not disappear from history. It possessed an
unquenchable vitality and made its way through more or less submerged channels
down the centuries. Movements, sects, and individuals that embodied its
cherished principles could be enumerated at great length. A list would include
Paulicians, the Bogomiles, the Bulgars, the Paterenes, the Comacines, the
Cathari; Albigensians, and pietists; Joachim of Floris, Roger Bacon, Robert
Bradwardine, Raymond Lully; the Alchemists, the Fire Philosophers; Paracelsus,
B. Figulus; the Friends of God, led by Nicholas of Basle; L'Homme de Cuir, in
Switzerland in the Engadine; the early Waldenses; the Bohemian tradition given
in the Tarot; the great Aldus' Academy at Venice; the Rosicrucians and the
Florentine Academy founded by Pletho. Some theosophists have attempted to find
esoteric meanings in the literature of the Troubadours, and in such writings as
The Romance of the Rose, the Holy Grail legends and the Arthurian Cycle,
if read in an esoteric sense; Gower's Confessio Amantis, Spencer's Faërie
Queen, the works of Dietrich of Berne, Wayland Smith, the Peredur Stories,
and the Mabinogian compilations. German pietism expressed fundamentally
Theosophic ideas through Eckhardt, Tauler, Suso, and Jacob Boehme. The names of
such figures as Count Rakowczi, Cagliostro, Count St. Germain, and Francis
Bacon have been linked with the secret orders. In fact there was hardly a
period when the ghosts of occult wisdom did not hover in the background of
European thought.
Sometimes its predominant manifestation was mystically
______________
32 C. W. Leadbeater: The Christian Creed (
15
religious; again it was cosmological and philosophical; never did it quite lose
its attachment to the conceptions of science, which was at times reduced nearly
to magic. And it is upon the implications of this scientific interest that the
occult theorist bases his claim that science, along with religion and
philosophy, has sprung in the beginning from esoteric knowledge. Not
overlooking the oldest scientific lore to be found in the sacred books of the
East, our attention is called to the astronomical science of the
"Chaldeans"; the similar knowledge among the Egyptians, such, for
instance, as led them to construct the Pyramids on lines conformable to
sidereal measurements and movements; the reputed knowledge of the precession of
the equinoxes among the Persian Magi and the "Chaldeans"; the later
work of the scientists among the Alexandrian savants, which had so important a
bearing upon the direction of the nascent science in the minds of Copernicus,
Galileo, Kepler, and Newton; the known achievements of Roger Bacon, Robert
Grosseteste, Agrippa von Nettesheim, and Jerome Cardano in incipient
empiricism. It has always been assumed that the strange mixture of true science
and grotesque magic found, for instance, in the work of Roger Bacon, justifies
the implication that the concern with magic operated as a hindrance to the
development of science. It should not be forgotten that the stimulus to
scientific discovery sprang from the presuppositions embodied in magical
theory. It is now beyond dispute that the magnificent achievements of
Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo were actuated by their brooding over the
significance of the Pythagorean theories of number and harmony. Both science
and magic aim, each in its special modus, at the control of nature. Through the
gateway of electricity, says theosophy, science has been admitted, part way at
least, into the inner sanctum of nature's dynamic heart. Magic has sought an
entry to the same citadel by another road.
The Theosophist, then, believes, on the strength of evidence only a fragment of
which has been touched upon here, that esotericism has been weaving its web of
influence, powerful even if subtle and unseen, throughout the religions,
16
philosophies, and sciences of the world. It makes little difference what names
have been attached from time to time to this esoteric tradition; and certainly
no attempt is made here to prove an underlying unity or continuity in all this
"wisdom literature." Suffice it to point out that in all ages there
have been movements analogous to modern Theosophy, and that the modern cult
regards itself as merely a regular revelation in the periodic resurgence of an
ancient learning.
17
CHAPTER II
THE AMERICAN BACKGROUND
An outline of the circumstances which may be said to constitute the background
for the American development of Theosophy should begin with the mass of strange
phenomena which took place, and were widely reported, in connection with the
religious revivals from 1740 through the Civil War period. A veritable epidemic
of what were known as the "barks" and the "jerks" swept
over the land. They were most frequent in evangelical meetings, but also became
common outside. The
During this period, too, several mathematical prodigies were publicly exhibited
in the performance of quite unaccountable calculations, giving instantaneously
the correct results of complicated manipulations of numbers.1 From about 1820,
rumors were beginning to be heard of exceptional psychic powers possessed by
the Hindus.
But a more notable stir was occasioned a little later when the country began to
be flooded with reports of exhibitions of mesmerism and hypnotism. Couéism had
not yet come, but the work of Mesmer, Janet, Charcot, Bernheim, and others in
______________
1 Paul Morphy, a chess "wizard" of startling capabilities, excited
wonder at the time, like the eight-year-old Polish lad of more recent times.
18
spread tradition; but when such people as Quimby and others added to the cult
of healing the practice of mesmerism, and subjoined both to a set of
metaphysical or spiritual formulae, the imaginative susceptibilities of the
people were vigorously stimulated, and the ferment resulted in cults of
"mind healing." Quimby was active with his public demonstrations
throughout
The cult of Swedenborgianism, coming in chiefly from
19
Theosophic in character, it all served to bring much grist to the later
Theosophical mill.
A certain identity of aims and characters between Theosophy and
Swedenborgianism is revealed in the fact that "in December, 1783, a little
company of sympathizers, with similar aims, met in London and founded the
'Theosophical Society,' among the members of which were John Flaxman, the
sculptor, William Sharpe, the engraver, and F. H. Barthelemon, the
composer."2 It was dissolved about 1788 when the Swedenborgian churches
began to function. Many such religious organizations could well be called
theosophical associations, as was the one founded by Brand in Cincinnati, Ohio,
in 1825.
Another organization which dealt hardly less with heavenly revelations, and
which must also be regarded as conducive to theosophical attitudes, was the
"Children of the Light," the Friends, or Quakers. With a history
antedating the nineteenth century by more than a hundred and fifty years, these
people held a significant place in the religious life of America during the
period we are delineating. Their intense emphasis upon the direct and
spontaneous irradiation of the spirit of God into the human consciousness
strikes a deep note of genuine mysticism. In fact, like Methodism, Quakerism
was born in the midst of a series of spiritualistic occurrences. George Fox
heard the heavenly voices and received inspirational messages directly from
spiritual visitants. The report of his supernatural experiences, and of the
miracles of healing which he was enabled to perform through spirit-given
powers, caused hundreds of people to flock to his banner and gave the movement
its primary impetus. His gospel was essentially one of spirit manifestation,
and his whole ethical system grew out of his conception of the régime of
personal life, conduct and mentality which was best designed to induce the
visitations of spirit influence. The spiritistic and mystical experiences of
the celebrated Madame Guyon, of France, enhanced the force of Fox's testimony.
______________
2 Encyclopedia Britannica: Article, "Swedenborgianism."
20
Not less inclined than the Friends to transcendental experiences were the
Shakers, who had settled in eighteen communistic associations or colonies in
the United States. They claimed to enjoy the power of apostolic healing,
prophecy, glossolalia, and the singing of inspired songs. They were led by the
spirit into deep and holy experiences, and claimed to be inspired by high
spiritual intelligences with whom they were in hourly communion. One of their
number, F. W. Evans, wrote to Robert Dale Owen, the Spiritualist, that the
Shakers had predicted the advent of Spiritualism seven years previously, and
that the Shaker order was the great medium between this world and the world of
spirits. He asserted that "Spiritualism originated among the Shakers of
America; that there were hundreds of mediums in the eighteen Shaker
communities, and that, in fact, nearly all the Shakers were mediums.
Mediumistic manifestations are as common among us as gold in California."3
He maintained that there were three degrees of spiritual manifestation, the third
of which is the "ministration of millennial truths to various nations,
tribes, kindred and people in the spirit world who were hungering and thirsting
after righteousness."4 He further pronounced a panegyric upon
Spiritualism, which is evidence that the Shakers were in sympathy with any
phenomena which seemed to indicate a connection with the celestial planes:
"Spiritualism has banished scepticism and infidelity from the minds of
thousands, comforted the mourner with angelic consolations, lifted up the
unfortunate, the outcast, the inebriate, taking away the sting of death, which
has kept mankind under perpetual bondage through fear--so that death is now, to
its millions of believers,
The kind and gentle servant who unlocks,
With noiseless hand, life's flower-encircled door,
To show us those we loved."5
Still another movement which had its origin in alleged supernaturalistic
manifestations and helped to intensify a
______________
3 William Howitt: History of the Supernatural (J. B. Lippincott &
Co., Philadelphia, 1863), Vol. II, p. 213.
4 Ibid. 5 Ibid., p. 214.
21
general belief in them, was the Church of the Latter Day Saints, or Mormons. In
1820, and again in 1823, Joseph Smith had a vision of an angel, who revealed to
him the repository of certain records inscribed on plates of gold, containing
the history of the aboriginal peoples of America. The ability to employ the
mystic powers of Urim and Thummim, which are embodied in these records,
constituted the special attribute of the seers of antiquity. The inscriptions
on the gold plates were represented as the key to the understanding of ancient
scriptures, and were said to be in a script known as Reformed Egyptian. The Book
of Mormon claims to be an English translation of these plates of gold.
It is not necessary here to follow the history of Smith and his church, but it
is interesting to point out the features of the case that touch either
Spiritualism or Theosophy. We have already noted the origin of Smith's
motivating idea in a direct message from the spirit world. We have also a
curious resemblance to Theosophy in the fact that an alleged ancient document
was brought to light as a book of authority, and that the material therein was
asserted to furnish a key to the interpretation of the archaic scriptures of
the world. Of the twelve articles of the Mormon creed, seven sections show a
spirit not incongruous with the tendency of Theosophic sentiment. Article One
professes belief in the Trinity; article Two asserts that men will be punished
for their own sins, not for Adam's; Three refers to the salvation of all
without exception; Seven sets forth belief in the gift of tongues, prophecy,
revelations, visions, healing, etc.; Eight questions the Bible's accurate
translation; Nine expresses the assurance that God will yet reveal many great
and important things pertaining to his kingdom; and Eleven proclaims freedom of
worship and the principle of toleration.
Orson Pratt, one of the leading publicists of the Mormon cult, said that where
there is an end of manifestation of new phenomena, such as visions, revelations
and inspiration, the people are lost in blindness. When prophecies fail,
darkness hangs over the people. In a tract issued by Pratt it is stated
22
that the Book of Mormon has been abundantly confirmed by miracles.
"Nearly every branch of the church has been blessed by miraculous signs
and gifts of the Holy Ghost, by which they have been confirmed, and by which we
know of a surety that this is the Church of Christ. They know that the blind
see, the lame walk, the deaf hear, the dumb speak, that lepers are cleansed,
that bones are set, that the cholera is rebuked, and that the most virulent
diseases give way through faith in the name of Christ and the power of His
gospel."6
About 1825, in a meeting at the home of Josiah Quincy in Boston, a
philosophic-religious movement was launched which may seem to have had but
meagre influence on the advent of Theosophy later in the century, but which in
its motive and animating spirit was probably one of the cult's most immediate
precursors. The Unitarian faith, courageously agitated from 1812 to 1814 by
William E. Channing, Edward Everett, and Francis Parkman, flowered into a
religious denomination in 1825 and thenceforth exercised, in a measure out of
all proportion to its numerical strength, a powerful influence on American
religious thought. Under Emerson and Parker a little later the principle of
free expression of opinion was carried to such length that the formulation of
an orthodox creed was next to impossible.
They questioned not only the Trinitarian doctrine, as pagan rather than
Christian (the identical position taken by Madame Blavatsky in the volumes of Isis
Unveiled), but the whole orthodox structure. The Bible was not to be
regarded as God's infallible and inspired word, but a work of exalted human
agencies. Christ was no heaven-born savior, but a worthy son of man. If he was
man and anything more, his life is worthless to mere men. His life was a man's
life, his gospel a man's gospel--otherwise inapplicable to us. Salvation is
within every person. Death does not determine the state of the soul for all
eternity; the soul passes on into spirit with all its earth-won character. In
the life that is to be, as well as in the life that now is, the soul must reap
what
______________
6 Ibid.
23
it sows. If there were a Unitarian creed, it might be summarized as follows:
The fatherhood of God; the brotherhood of man; the leadership of Jesus;
salvation by character; the progress of mankind onward and upward forever. All
this, as far it goes, is strikingly harmonious with the Theosophic position.
That there was an evident community of interests between the two movements is
indicated by the fact that Unitarianism, like Theosophy, sought Hindu
connections, and strangely enough made a sympathetic entente with the
Brahmo-Somaj Society, while Theosophy later affiliated with the Arya-Somaj.7
No examination of the American background of Theosophy can fail to take account
of that movement which carried the minds of New England thinkers to a lofty
pitch during the early half of the nineteenth century, Transcendentalism. It
has generally been attributed to the impact of German Romanticism, transmitted
by way of England through Carlyle, Coleridge, and Wordsworth. French influence
was really more direct and dominating, but the powerful effect of Oriental
religion and philosophy on Emerson, hitherto not considered seriously, should
not be overlooked. "All of Emerson's notes on Oriental scriptures have
been deleted from Bliss Perry's Heart of Emerson's Journals."8 No
student conversant with the characteristic marks of Indian philosophy needs
documentary corroboration of the fact that Emerson's thought was saturated with
typically Eastern conceptions. The evidence runs through nearly all his works
like a design in a woven cloth. "Scores upon scores of passages in his Journals
and Essays show that he leaned often on the Vedas for inspiration,
and paraphrased lines of the Puranas in his poems."9 But direct testimony
______________
7 As early as 1824 Unitarians in America took a lively interest in the Hindu
leader Rammohun Roy, who had "adopted Unitarianism," and also in the
work of the Rev. William Adam, a Baptist missionary, who had become converted
to Unitarianism in India. A British-Indian Unitarian Association was formed,
and the Rev. Chas. H. A. Dall was sent to Calcutta, where he effected the
alliance with the Brahmo-Somaj.
8 Article: Emerson's Debt to the Orient, by Arthur E. Christy, in The
Monist, January, 1928.
9 Ibid.
24
from Emerson himself is not wanting. His Journals prove that his reading
of the ancient Oriental classics was not sporadic, but more or less constant.10
He refers to some of them in the lists of each year's sources. In 1840 he tells
how in the heated days he read nothing but the "Bible of the tropics,
which I find I come back upon every three or four years. It is sublime as heat
and night and the breathless ocean. It contains every religious sentiment. . .
. It is no use to put away the book; if I trust myself in the woods or in a
boat upon the pond, Nature makes a Brahmin of me presently."11 This was at
the age of twenty-seven. In the Journal of 1845 he writes:
"The Indian teaching, through its cloud of legends, has yet a simple and
grand religion, like a queenly countenance seen through a rich veil. It teaches
to speak the truth, love others as yourself, and to despise trifles. The East
is grand--and makes Europe appear the land of trifles. Identity! Identity!
Friend and foe are of one stuff . . . Cheerful and noble is the genius of this
cosmogony."12
Lecturing before graduate classes at Harvard he later said: "Thought has
subsisted for the most part on one root; the Norse mythology, the Vedas,
Shakespeare have served the ages." In referring in one passage to the
Bible he says:
"I have used in the above remarks the Bible for the ethical revelation
considered generally, including, that is, the Vedas,
______________
10 The Journal shows that as early as 1822 he had looked into Zoroaster.
In 1823 he refers to two articles in Hindu mathematics and mythology in Vol. 29
of the Edinburgh Review. By 1832 he had dipped into Pythagoras. In 1836
he quotes Confucius, Empedocles, and Xenophanes. By 1838 he had read the Institutes
of Menu, and again quoted Zoroaster, Buddha, and Confucius. The first
reference to the Vedas is made in 1839. In 1841 he had seen the Vishnu
Sarna (a corrupt spelling of Vishnu Sharman), together with Hermes
Trismegistus and the Neo-Platonists, Iamblichus, and Proclus. The She-King and
the Chinese Classics are noted in 1843, and the first reference to the Bhagavad
Gita in 1845. In 1847 comes the Vishnu Purana, and in 1849 the Desatir,
a supposedly Persian work, and in 1855 the Rig Veda Sanhita.
11 This passage is found in Letters of Emerson to a Friend, edited
by Charles Eliot Norton.
12 Emerson's Journal for 1845, p. 130.
25
the sacred writings of every nation, and not of the Hebrews alone."13
Elsewhere he says:
"Yes, the Zoroastrian, the Indian, the Persian scriptures are majestic and
more to our daily purpose than this year's almanac or this day's newspaper. I
owed--my friend and I owed--a magnificent day to the Bhagavat-Gita. It was the
first of books; it was as if an empire spoke to us, nothing small or unworthy,
but large, serene, consistent, the voice of an old intelligence which in
another age and another climate had pondered and thus disposed of the same
questions which exercise us. . . . Let us cherish the venerable oracle."14
The first stanza of Emerson's poem "Brahma, Song of the Soul," runs
as follows:
"If the red slayer thinks he slays,
Or if the slain thinks he is slain,
They know not well the subtle ways
I keep, and pass and turn again."
Could the strange ideas and hardly less strange language of this verse have
been drawn elsewhere than from the 19th verse of the Second Valli, of the Katha
Upanishad,15 which reads?:
"If the slayer thinks I slay; if the slain thinks I am slain, then both of
them do not know well. It (the soul) does not slay nor is it slain."
His poem "Hamatreya" comes next in importance as showing Hindu
influence. In another poem, "Celestial Love," the wheel of birth and
death is referred to:
"In a region where the wheel
On which all beings ride,
Visibly revolves."
Emerson argues for reincarnation in the Journal of 1845. "Traveling
the path of life through thousands of births."
______________
13 Emerson's Journals, Vol. V, p. 334.
14 Emerson's Journals, Vol. VII, p. 241.
15 Biblioteca Indica, Vol. XV, translated by E. Roer, Calcutta, 1853.
26
"By the long rotation of fidelity they meet again in worthy forms."
Emerson's "oversoul" is synonymous with a Sanskrit term. He regarded
matter as the negative manifestation of the Universal Spirit. Mind was the
expression of the same Spirit in its positive power. Man, himself, is nothing
but the universal spirit present in a material organism. Soul is "part and
parcel of God." He says that "the soul in man is not an organ, but
animates and exercises all organs; from within and from behind a light shines
through us upon things, and makes us aware that we are nothing, that the light
is all."16 This is Vedanta philosophy. In the Journal of 1866 he
wrote:
"In the history of intellect, there is no more important fact than the
Hindu theology, teaching that the beatitude or supreme good is to be attained
through science: namely, by the perception of the real from the unreal, setting
aside matter, and qualities or affections or emotions, and persons and actions,
as mayas or illusions, and thus arriving at the conception of the One eternal
Life and Cause, and a perpetual approach and assimilation to Him, thus escaping
new births and transmigrations. . . . Truth is the principle and the moral of
Hindu theology, Truth as against the Maya which deceives Gods and men; Truth,
the principle, and Retirement and Self-denial the means of attaining
it."17
Mr. Christy18 states that Emerson's concept of evolution must be thought of in
terms of emanation; and a detailed examination of his concept of compensation
reduces it to the doctrine of Karma.
The Journals are full of quotable passages upon one or another phase of
Hinduism. And there are his other poems "Illusions" and
"Maya," whose names bespeak Oriental presentations. But Mr. Christy
thinks the following excerpt is Emerson's supreme tribute to Orientalism:
"There is no remedy for musty, self-conceited English life made up of
fictitious hating ideas--like Orientalism. That astonishes and disconcerts
English decorum. For once there is thunder he
______________
16 Emerson's Works (Centenary Edition), Vol. II, p. 270.
17 Emerson's Journals, Vol. X, p. 162.
18 Article: "Emerson's Debt to the Orient," Arthur E. Christy, The
Monist, January, 1928.
27
never heard, light he never saw, and power which trifles with time and
space."19
It may seem ludicrous to suggest that Emerson was the chief forerunner of
Madame Blavatsky, her John the Baptist. Yet seriously, without Emerson, Madame
Blavatsky could hardly have launched her gospel when she did with equal hope of
success. There is every justification for the assertion that Emerson's
Orientalistic contribution to the general Transcendental trend of thought was
preparatory to Theosophy. It must not be forgotten that his advocacy of
Brahmanic ideas and doctrines came at a time when the expression of a laudatory
opinion of the Asiatic religions called forth an opprobrium from evangelistic
quarters hardly less than vicious in its bitterness. Theosophy could not hope
to make headway until the virulent edge of that orthodox prejudice had been
considerably blunted. It was Emerson's magnanimous eclecticism which
administered the first and severest rebuke to that prejudice, and inaugurated
that gradual mollification of sentiment toward the Orientals which made
possible the welcome which Hindu Yogis and Swamis received toward the end of
the century.
The exposition of Emerson's orientalism makes it unnecessary to trace the
evidences of a similar influence running through the philosophical thinking of
Thoreau and Walt
_______
19 In 1854 a most significant fact was recorded in New England history. A young
Englishman, Thomas Cholmondeley, friend of Arthur Hugh Clough, and nephew of
Bishop Heber, came to Concord with letters of introduction to Emerson. The
latter sent him to board at Mrs. John Thoreau's. A short time after
Cholmondeley's return to England, Henry Thoreau received forty-four volumes of
Hindu literature as a gift from the young nobleman. Of these, twenty-three were
bequeathed to Emerson at Thoreau's death. The list contained the names of such
eminent translators as H. H. Milman, H. H. Wilson, M. E. Burnouff and Sir
William Jones. The books were the texts from the Vedas, the Vishnu
Purana, the Mahabarhata, with the Bhagavad Gita. Tradition has it
that Emerson died with a copy of the Bhagavad Gita (said to have been
one of three copies in the country at the time) in his faltering grasp. It is
known that he read, besides, numerous volumes of Persian poetry, translations
of Confucius and other Chinese philosophers, by James Ligge, Marshman and David
Collier, and books on Hindu mathematics and mythology. The poem
"Brahma" first appeared in the Journal of July, 1856, and in
the Atlantic Monthly, for November, 1867. He did not receive Thoreau's
bequest until 1852, but it requires no stretch of imagination to presume that
the two friends had access to each other's libraries in the interval between
1854 and 1862.
28
Whitman. The robust cosmopolitanism of these two intellects lifted them out of
the provincialisms of the current denominations into the realm of universal
sympathies. We know that Thoreau became the recipient of forty-four volumes of
the Hindu texts in 1854; but it is evident that he, like Emerson, had had
contact with Brahmanical literature previous to that. His works are replete
with references to Eastern ideas and beliefs. He could hardly have associated
so closely with Emerson as he did and escaped the contagion of the latter's
Oriental enthusiasm.
Mr. Horace L. Traubel, one of the three literary executors of Whitman, had in
his possession the poet's own copy of the Bhagavad Gita. Perry and
Binns, in their biographies of Whitman, give lists of the literature with which
he was familiar; and many ancient authors are mentioned. Among them are
Confucius, the Hindu poets, Persian poets, Zoroaster; portions of the Vedas and
Puranas, Alger's Oriental Poetry and other Eastern sources. Dr. Richard M.
Bucke, another of the three literary executors, and a close friend and
associate of "the good gray poet," was one of the prominent early
Theosophists, and it is reasonable to presume that Whitman was familiar with
Theosophic theory through the channel of this friendship. Whitman likewise gave
form and body to another volume of sentiment which has contributed, no one can
say how much, to the adoption of Theosophy. This was America's own native
mysticism. It created an atmosphere in which the traditions of the supernatural
grew robust and realistic.
Attention must now be directed to that wide-spread movement in America which
has come to be known as New Thought. It came, as has been hinted at, out of the
spiritualization, or one might say, doctrinization, of mesmerism. Observation
of the surprising effects of hypnotic control, indicating the presence of a
psychic energy in man susceptible to external or self-generated suggestion, led
to the inference that a linking of spiritual affirmation with the unconscious
dynamism would conduce to invariably beneficent results, that might be made
permanent for character. If a
29
jocular suggestion by the stage mesmerist could lead the subject into a
ludicrous performance; if a suggestion of illness, of pain, of a headache,
could produce the veritable symptoms; why could not a suggestion of adequate
strength and authority lead to the actualization of health, of personality, of
well-being, of spirituality? The task was merely to transform animal magnetism
into spiritual suggestion. The aim was to indoctrinate the subconscious mind
with a fixation of spiritual sufficiency and opulence, until the personality
came to embody and manifest on the physical plane of life the character of the
inner motivation. Seeing what an obsession of a fixed abnormal idea had done to
the body and mind in many cases, New Thought tried to regenerate the life in a
positive and salutary direction by the conscious implantation of a higher
spiritual concept, until it, too, became obsessive, and wrought an effect on
the outer life coördinate with its own nature. The process of hypnotic
suggestion became a moral technique, with a potent religious formula, according
to which spiritual truth functioned in place of personal magnetic force.
Essentially it reduced itself to the business of self-hypnotization by a lofty
conception. Thought itself was seen to possess mesmeric power. "As a man
thinketh in his heart" became the slogan of New Thought, and the kindred
Biblical adjuration--"Be ye transformed by the renewing of your
mind"--furnished the needed incentive to positive mental aggression. The
world of today is familiar with the line of phrases which convey the basic
ideology of the New Thought cults. One hears much of being in tune with the
Infinite, of making the at-one-ment with the powers of life, of getting into
harmony with the universe, of making contact with the reservoir of Eternal
Supply, of getting en rapport with the Cosmic Consciousness, of keeping
ourselves puny and stunted because we do not ask more determinedly from the
Boundless.
Here is unmistakable evidence of a somewhat diluted Hinduism. Under the pioneering
of P. P. Quimby, Horatio W. Dresser, and others, study clubs were formed and
lecture courses given. Charles Brodie Patterson, W. J. Colville,
30
James Lane Allen, C. D. Larson, Orison S. Marden, and a host of others, aided
in the popularization of these ideas, until in the past few decades there has
been witnessed an almost endless brood of ramifications from the parent
conception, with associations of Spiritual Science, Divine Science, Cosmic
Truth, Universal Light and Harmony carrying the message. So we have been called
upon to witness the odd spectacle of what was essentially Hindu Yoga philosophy
masquerading in the guise of commanding personality and forceful salesmanship!
But grotesque as these developments have been, there is no doubting their importance
in the Theosophical background. They have served to introduce the thought of
the Orient to thousands, and have become stepping-stones to its deeper
investigation.
A concomitant episode in the expansion of New Thought and Transcendentalism was
the direct program of Hindu propaganda fathered by Hindu spokesmen themselves.
When it became profitable, numerous Yogis, Swamis, "Adepts," and
"Mahatmas" came to this country and lectured on the doctrines and
principles of Orientalism to audiences of élite people with mystical
susceptibilities. Some time in the seventies, Boston was galvanized into a
veritable quiver of interest in Eastern doctrines by the eloquent P. C.
Mazoomdar, author of The Oriental Christ, whose campaign left its deep
impress. His work, in fact, formed one of the links between Unitarianism and
Brahmanic thought, already noted. In 1893 Swami Vivekananda, chosen as a
delegate to the World Congress of Religions at the Columbian Exposition at
Chicago, and author of Yoga Philosophy, began preaching the Yoga
principles of thought and discipline, and instituted in New York the Vedanta
Society. Almost every year since his coming has brought public lectures and
private instruction courses by native Hindus in the large American cities.
Concomitant with the evolution of New Thought came the sensational
dissemination of Mrs. Eddy's Christian Science. Offspring of P. P. Quimby's
mesmeric science, and erected by Mrs. Eddy's strange enthusiasm into a healing
31
cult based on a reinterpretation of Christian doctrines--the allness of Spirit
and the nothingness of matter-the organization has enjoyed a steady and
pronounced growth and drawn into its pale thousands of Christian communicants
who felt the need of a more dynamic or more fruitful gospel. The conception of
the impotence of matter, as non-being, is as old as Greek and Hindu philosophy.
Mrs. Eddy's contribution in the matter was her use of the philosophical idea as
a psychological mantram for healing, and her adroitness in lining up the
Christian scriptures to support the idea.
It would require a fairly discerning insight to mark out clearly the
inter-connection of Christian Science and Theosophy. There is basically little
similarity between the two schools, or little common ground on which they might
meet. On the contrary there is much direct antagonism in their views and dogma.
Nevertheless the Boston cult tended indirectly to bring some of its votaries
along the path toward occultism. In the first place, like Unitarianism, it had
induced thousands of sincere seekers for a new and liberal faith to sever the
ties of their former servile attachment to an uninspiring orthodoxy. Secondly,
Christian Science does yeoman service in "demonstrating" the
spiritual viewpoint. Its emphasis on spirit, as opposed to material concepts of
reality, is entirely favorable to the general theses of Theosophy. Thirdly, the
intellectual limitations of the system develop the need of a larger philosophy,
which Theosophy stands ready to supply. Christian Science, being primarily a
Christian healing cult, with a body of ideas adequate to that function, often
leads the intelligent and open-minded student in its ranks to become aware that
it falls far short of offering a comprehensive philosophy of life. It has
little or nothing to say about man's origin, his present rank in a universal
order, or his destiny. It leaves the pivotal question of immortality in the
same status as does conventional Christianity. Many Christian Science adherents
have seen that Theosophy offers a fuller and more adequate cosmograph, and
accordingly adopted it. Their experience in the Eddy
32
system brought them to the outer court of the Occult Temple.20
Among major movements that paved the way for Theosophy, the one perhaps most
directly conducive to it is Spiritualism, for the founder of the Theosophical
Society began her career in the Spiritualistic ranks. On account of this close
relationship it is necessary to outline the origin and spread of this strange
movement more fully.
The weird behavior of two country girls, the one twelve and the other nine, in
the hamlet of Hydesville, near Rochester, New York, in the spring of 1847, was
like a spark to power for the release of religious fancy; for Margaret and Kate
Fox were supposed to have picked up again the thread of communication between
the world of human consciousness and the world of disembodied spirits, and thus
to have given fresh reinforcement to man's assurance of immortality. From this
bizarre beginning the movement spread rapidly to all parts of America, England,
and France. In nearly every town in America groups were soon meeting, eager for
manifestations and fervently invoking the denizens of the unseen worlds.
Various methods and means were provided whereby the disembodied entities could
communicate with dull mundane faculties. Many and varied were the types of
response. Besides the simple "raps," there were tinklings of tiny
aerial bells, flashings of light, tipping of tables, levitation of furniture
and of human bodies, messages through the planchette, free voice messages,
trumpet speaking, alphabet rapping, materialization of the hands and of
complete forms, trance catalepsis and inspiration, automatic writing, slate
writing, glossolalia, and many other variety of phenomena. Mediums, clairvoyants,
inspirational
______________
20 This difference between the two cults may perhaps be best depicted by
quoting the words used in the author's presence by a woman of intelligence who
had founded two Christian Science churches and had been notably successful as a
healing practitioner, but who later united with the Theosophical Society. She
said: "Christian Science had rather well satisfied my spiritual needs, but
had totally starved my intellect." Her experience is doubtless typical of
that of many others, in whom, after the first burst of sensational interest in
healing has receded, the yearning for a satisfactory philosophy of life and the
cosmos surged uppermost again.
33
speakers sprang forward plentifully; and each one became the focus of a group
activity. It is somewhat difficult for us to reconstruct the picture of this
flare of interest and activity, the scope of this absorbing passion for spirit
manifestation. It attests the eagerness of the human heart for tangible
evidence of survival. With periodical ebb and flow it has persisted to the
present day, when its vogue is hardly less general than at any former time. In
the fifties and sixties the Spiritualistic agitation was in full flush, with
many extraordinary occurrences accredited to its exponents.21
Spiritualism encountered opposition among the clergy and the materialistic
scientists, yet it has hardly ever been wanting in adherents among the members
of both groups. An acquaintance with its supporters would reveal a surprising
list of high civil and government officials, attorneys, clergymen, physicians,
professors, and scientists.22
One of the first Spiritualistic writers of this country was Robert Dale Owen,
whose Footfalls on the Boundary of Another World and The Debatable
Land were notable contributions. Two of the most eminent representatives of
the
______________
21 It has been conservatively estimated that in 1852 there were three hundred
mediumistic circles in Philadelphia. The number of mediums in the United States
in 1853 was thirty thousand. In 1855 there were two and a half million
Spiritualists in the land, with an increase of three hundred each year. The
rate of increase far outran those of the Lutheran and Methodist denominations.
An interesting feature of this rapid spread of the movement was its political
significance and results. Not inherently concerned with politics, its devotees
mostly adopted strong anti-slavery tenets. Judge Edmonds, an eminent jurist,
converted to Spiritualism by his (at first skeptical) investigations of it,
asserted that the Spiritualist vote came near to carrying the election of 1856,
and actually did carry that of 1860 for the North against the Democratic party.
Another most interesting side-light is the fact that the sweep of
Spiritualistic excitement redeemed thousands of atheists to an acceptance of
religious verities. (For these and other interesting data see Howitt's History
of the Supernatural, Vol. II.)
22 Spiritualists say that Lincoln was eventually moved to emancipate the slaves
by his reception of a spirit message through Hattie Colburn, a medium who came
to see him about a furlough for her son. Horace Greeley was favorably impressed
by the evidence presented. And a later President, McKinley, maintained a deep
concern in the phenomena, along with his powerful political manager, Senator
Mark Hanna, who seldom undertook a move of any consequence without first
consulting a medium, Mrs. Gutekunst, to whom, for purposes of ready
availability, he had given a residence in his home. Senators and Cabinet
members were by no means immune.
34
movement in its earliest days were Prof. Robert Hare, an eminent scientist and
the inventor of the oxyhydrogen blow-pipe, and Judge Edmonds, a leading jurist.
Both these men had approached the subject at first in a skeptical spirit, with
the intention of disclosing its unsound premises; but they were fair enough to
study the evidence impartially, with the result that both were convinced of the
genuineness of the phenomena. Both avowed their convictions courageously in
public, and Judge Edmonds made extensive lecture tours of the country, the
propaganda effect of which was great.23 Before the actual launching of the
Theosophical Society in 1875 at least four prominent later Theosophists had
played more or less important rôles in the drama of Spiritualism. Madame
Blavatsky, as we shall see, had identified herself with its activities; Mr. J.
R. Newton was a vigorous worker; and it was Col. Olcott himself who brought the
manifestations taking place in 1873 at the Eddy farmhouse near Chittenden,
Vermont, to public notice and who put forth one of the first large volumes
covering these and other phenomena in 1874, People From the Other World. The
fourth member was Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten, who had served as a medium with
the Bulwer-Lytton group of psychic investigators in England, and who added two
books to Spiritualistic literature--Art Magic and Nineteenth Century
Miracles. Col. Olcott, Madame Blavatsky, and Mrs. Britten made material
contributions to several Spiritualistic magazines, especially The Spiritual
Scientist, edited in Boston.
Meantime Spiritualistic investigation got under way and after the sixties a
stream of reports, case histories, accounts of phenomena, and books from
prominent advocates flooded the country. The Seybert Commission on
Spiritualism, composed of leading officers and professors at the University of
Pennsylvania, submitted its report in 1888. In the same
______________
23 Others prominent in the movement at the time were Governor N. P. Tallmadge,
of Wisconsin, Rev. Adin Ballou, J. P. Davis and Benjamin Coleman; and Profs.
Bush, Mapes, Gray, and Channing from leading universities. Mr. Epes Sargeant,
of Boston, added prestige to the cult. A Dr. Gardner, of Boston, and the
Unitarian Theodore Parker gave testimony as to the beneficent influence exerted
by the Spiritualistic faith.
35
year R. B. Davenport undertook to turn the world away from what he considered a
delusion with his book Deathblow to Spiritualism: The True Story of the Fox
Sisters; but he found that Spiritualism had a strange vitality that enabled
it to survive many a "deathblow." As a result of studies in psychic
phenomena in England came F. W. H. Myers' impressive work, The Human
Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death, in which the foundations for
the theory of the subliminal or subconscious mind were laid.
But the work of the mediums themselves kept public feeling most keenly alert. A
list of some of the most prominent ones includes Mrs. Hayden, Henry Slade,
Pierre L. O. A. Keeler, the slate-writer, Robert Houdin (who bequeathed his
name and exploits to the later Houdini), Ira and William Davenport, Anna Eva
Fay, Charles Slade, Eusapia Paladino, Mrs. Leonara Piper. Robert Dale Owen,
already mentioned as author, was a medium of no mean ability. In the same
category was J. M. Peebles, of California, whose books, Seers of the Ages
and Who Are These Spiritualists? and whose public lecture tours, rendered
him one of the most prominent of all the advocates of the cult. A career of inspirational
public speaking was staged by Cora V. Richmond, who gave lectures on erudite
themes with an uncommon flow of eloquence. W. J. Colville began where she
ended, giving unprepared addresses on topics suggested by the audience.
The three most famous American mediums deserve somewhat more extended
treatment. The first of the trio is Daniel Dunglas Home, who was a poor
Scottish boy adopted in America. While a child, spiritual power manifested
itself to him to his terror and annoyance. Raps came around him on the table or
desk, on the chairs or walls. The furniture moved about and was attracted
toward him. His aunt, with whom he lived was in consternation at these
phenomena, and, deeming him possessed, sent for three clergymen to exorcise the
spirit; when they did not succeed, she threw his Sunday suit and linen out the
window and pushed him out-of-doors. He was thus cast on the world without
friends, but the power that he possessed raised him friends and sent
36
him forth from America to be the planter of Spiritualism all over Europe.24
The second of the triumvirate was Andrew Jackson Davis. His function seemed to
be that of the seer and the scribe, rather than of the producer of material
operations. He was born of poor parents, in 1826, in Orange Country, New York.
He seems to have inherited a clairvoyant faculty. He received only five months'
schooling in the village, it being "found impossible to teach him anything
there."25 During his solitary hours in the fields he saw visions and heard
voices. Removing to Poughkeepsie, he became the clairvoyant of a mesmeric
lecturer, and in this capacity began to excite wonder by his revelations. This
was before the Rochester knockings were heard. He diagnosed and healed
diseases, and prescribed for scores who came to him, surprising both patients
and physicians by his competence. Then he began to see "into the heart of
things," to descry the essential nature of the world and the spiritual
constitution of the universe. He could see the interior of bodies and the metals
hidden in the earth. Adding his testimony to that of Fox and Swedenborg, he
asserted that every animal represented some human quality, some vice or virtue.
He gave Greek and Latin names of things, without having a knowledge of these
languages. In a vision he beheld The Magic Staff on which he was urged
to learn during life; on it was written his life's motto: "Under all
circumstances keep an open mind." In 1845 he delivered one hundred and
fifty-seven lectures in New York which announced a new philosophy of the
universe. They were published under the title, Nature's Divine Revelation,
a book of eight hundred pages. Davis then became a voluminous writer.26
______________
24 By strange and fortuitous circumstances he became the guest of the Emperor
of the French, of the King of Holland, of the Czar of Russia, and of many
lesser princes. His demonstrations before these grandees were extensions of the
phenomena occurring in his youth. See Howitt's History of the Supernatural,
Vol. II, pp. 222 ff.
25 Howitt's History of the Supernatural, Vol. II, p. 225.
26 He published his The Great Harmonia (Boston 1850); The Philosophy
of Spiritual Intercourse (New York, 1851); The Penetralia (Boston,
1856); The Present Age and
37
Thomas L. Harris, the third great representative, was much attracted by Davis' The
Divine Revelations of Nature, but developed spiritistic powers along a
somewhat different line, that of poetic inspiration. In his early exhibitions
of this supernormal faculty he dictated who epics, containing occasionally
excellent verse, under the alleged influence of Byron, Shelley, Keats and
others. The interesting manner in which these poems--a whole volume of three or
four hundred pages at a time--were created, is more amazing than their poetic
merit. Mr. Brittan, an English publisher, tells us that Harris dictated and he
wrote down The Lyric of the Golden Age, a poem of 381 pages, in
ninety-four hours! The Lyric of the Morning Land and other pretentious
works were produced in a similar manner.
"But," says William Howitt in his History of the Supernatural,
"the progress of Harris into an inspirational oratory is still more
surprising. He claims, by opening up his interior being, to receive influx of
divine intuition in such abundance and power as to throw off under its
influence the most astonishing strains of eloquence. This receptive and
communicative power he attributes to an internal spiritual breathing
corresponding to the outer natural breathing. As the body lungs imbibe air, so,
he contends, the spiritual lungs inspire and respire the divine aura, refluent
with the highest thought and purest sentiment, and that without any labor or
trial of brain."27
Spiritualism is one of the most direct lines of approach to Theosophy, since an
acceptance of the possibility of spiritistic phenomena is a prerequisite for
the adoption of the larger scheme of occult truth. Spiritualism covers a
portion of the ground embraced by the belief in reincarnation, and in so far
constitutes an introduction to it. Theosophy is further, an endorsement of the
primary position of the Spiritualists regarding the survival of the soul
entity, and thus commends itself to their approbation. The Spiritualists have
been considerably vexed by the question of reincarna-
______________
Inner Life (New York, 1853); and The Magic Staff (Boston, 1858).
He edited a periodical, The Herald of Progress.
27 Howitt's The History of the Supernatural, Vol. II, p. 228.
38
tion, and their ranks are split over the subject. Some of the message seem to
endorse it, others evade it, and some negate the idea. What is significant at
this point is that the Spiritualistic agitation prepared the way for Theosophic
conceptions. A large percentage of the first membership came from the ranks of
the Spiritualists.
But Spiritualism is but one facet of a human interest which has expressed
itself in all ages, embracing the various forms of mysticism, occultism,
esotericism, magic, healing, wonder-working, arcane science, and theurgy. The
growing acquaintance with Yoga practice and Hindu philosophy in this country
under the stimulus of many eloquent Eastern representatives has already been
mentioned. The demonstrations of mesmeric power lent much plausibility to
Oriental pretensions to extraordinary genius for that sort of thing. More than
might be supposed, there was prevalent in Europe and America alike a
never-dying tradition of magical art, a survival of Medieval European beliefs
in superhuman activities and powers both in man and nature. Among the rural and
unschooled populations this tradition assumed the form of harmless
superstitions. Among more learned peoples it issued in philosophic speculations
dealing with the spiritual energies of nature, the hidden faculties of man,
such as prophecy, tongues and ecstatic vision, and the extent and possibility
of man's control over the external world through the manipulation of a subtle
ether possessing magnetic quality. The heritage of Paracelsus, Robert Fludd,
Thomas Vaughn and Roger Bacon, Agrippa von Nettesheim, the Florentine
Platonists and their German, French, and English heirs still lingered. The
Christian scriptures were themselves replete with incidents of the
supernatural, with necromancy, witchcraft, miracles, ghost-walking, spirit
messages, symbolical dreams, and the whole armory of thaumaturgical exploits.
The doctrine of Satan was itself calculated to enliven the imagination with
ideas of demoniac possession, and was all the more credible by reason of the
prevalence of insanity which was ascribed to spirit obsession. The early
nineteenth
39
century was must closer to the Middle Ages than our own time is, not only
because education was less general, but also because a far larger proportion of
the population was agrarian instead of metropolitan. Such cults were, however,
by no means restricted to "backwoods" sections. They were
astonishingly prevalent in the larger centers. More enlightened groups accepted
a less crude form of the practices. Where knowledge ceases superstition may
begin; and the problems of life that press upon us for solution and that are
still beyond our grasp, lead the mind into every sort of rationalization or
speculation. Perhaps more people than acknowledge God in church pews believe in
the existence of intelligences that play a part in life, whether in answer to
prayer, in suggestive dreams, in occasional vision and apparitions, in messages
through mediums, or in whatever guise; and out of such an unreflective theology
arise many of the types of superstitious philosophy. To analyze this situation
in its entirety would take us into extensive fields of folk-lore and involve
every sort of old wives' tale imaginable. The chief point is that the varieties
of chimney-corner legend and omnipresent superstition have had their origin in
a larger primitive interpretation of the facts and forces of nature. They must
be recognized as the modern progeny of ancient hylozoism and animism. In the
childhood of our culture, as well as in the childhood of the race and of the
individual, there is a close sympathy between man and nature which leads him to
ascribe living quality to the external world. Countryside fables are doubtless
the jejune remnant of what was once felt to be a vital magnetic relation
between man's spirit and the spirit of the world. They are the distorted forms
of some of the ancient rites for effecting magical intercourse between man and
nature. While it is not to be inferred that Theosophy itself was built on the
material embodied in countryside credulity, it will be seen that the native
inclination toward an animistic interpretation of phenomena was in a measure
true to the deeper theses which the new cult presented. Madame Blavatsky
herself says in Isis Unveiled that the spontaneous re-
40
sponsiveness of the peasant mind is likely to lead to a closer apprehension of
the living spirit of Nature than can be attained by the sophistications of
reason.
The major tendencies in the direction of Theosophy have now been enumerated. It
remains only to mention the scattering of American students before 1875 whose
researches were taking them into the realm where the fundamentals of Theosophy
itself were to be found. We refer to the Rosicrucians, the Freemasons, the
Kabalists, Hermeticists, Egyptologists, Assyriologists, students of the
Mysteries, of the Christian origins, of the pagan cults, and the small but
gradually increasing number of Comparative Religionists and Philologists.28
There were men of intelligence both in Europe and America, who had kept on the
track of ancient and medieval esotericism, and the opening up of Sanskrit
literature gave a decided impetus to a renaissance of research in those realms.
The material that went into Frazer's Golden Bough, Ignatius
Donnelley's Atlantis: the Antediluvian World, Hargrave Jennings' The
Rosicrucians,
______________
28 That there was much very real theosophy among the early German Pietists who
settled north and west of Philadelphia in the Pennsylvania colony is indicated
by the following extract from The German Sectarians of Pennsylvania, by
Julius Friedrich Sachse (Vol. I, pp. 457 ff.). He says: "Thus far but
little attention has been given by writers on Pennsylvania history to the
influences exercised by the various mystical, theosophical and cabbalistic
societies and fraternities of Europe in the evangelization of this Province and
in reclaiming the German settlers from the rationalism with which they were
threatened by their contact with the English Quakers.
"Labadie's teachings; Boehme's visions; the true Rosicrucianism of the
original Kelpius party; the Philadelphian Society, whose chief apostle was Jane
Leade; the fraternity which taught the restitution of all things; the mystical
fraternity led by Dr. Julian Wilhelm Petersen and his wife Eleanor von
Merlau-both members of the Frankfort community-all found a foothold upon the
soil of Penn's colony and exercised a much larger share in the development of
this country than is accorded to them. It has even been claimed by some
superficial writers and historians of the day that there was no strain of
mysticism whatever in the Ephrata Community, or, in fact, connected with any of
the early German movements in Pennsylvania. Such a view is refuted by the
writings of Kelpius, Beissel, Miller, and many others who then lived, sought
the Celestial Bridegroom and awaited the millennium which they earnestly
believed to be near.
"With the advent of the Moravian Brethren in Pennsylvania the number of
these mystical orders was increased by the introduction of two others, viz.,
The Order of the Passion of Jesus (Der Orden des Leidens Jesu), of which Count
Zinzendorf was Grand Commander, and the Order of the Mustard Seed (Der Senfkorn
Orden)."
41
and many other compendious works of the sort, was being collated out of the
flotsam and jetsam of ancient survival and assembled into a picture beginning
to assume definite outline and more than haphazard meaning. The great system of
Neo-Platonism, the Gnostics, with Apollonius of Tyana, and Philo Judaeus were
coming under inspection. The universality of religious myths and rites was being
noted. In short, the large body of ancient thought, so deeply imbued with the
occult, was beginning to be scrutinized by the scholars of the nineteenth
century.
It was into this situation that Madame Blavatsky came. Her office, she said,
was that of a clavigera; she bore a key which would provide students
with a principle of integration for the loose material which would enable them
to piece together the scattered stones and glittering jewels picked up here and
there into a structure of surpassing grandeur and priceless worth. She would
show that the gems of literature, whose mystic profundity astonished and
perplexed the savants, were but the fragments of a once-glorious spiritual
Gnosis.
42
CHAPTER III
HELENA P. BLAVATSKY: HER LIFE AND
PSYCHIC CAREER
Who was Madame Blavatsky? Every new régime of belief or of social organization
must be studied with a view to determining as far as possible how much of the
movement is a contribution of the individuality of the founder and how much
represents a traditional deposit. This inquiry is of first importance in a
consideration of the Theosophical Society, because, more than in most systems,
the personal endowment of its founder gave it its specific coloring, character
and form. It should be said at this point that the career of Madame Blavatsky
as outlined here does not purport to be a complete or authoritative biography.
It was obviously impossible to undertake such an investigation of her life, as
the difficulties of obscure research in three or four continents were
practically prohibitive. We have been forced to base our study upon the body of
biographical material that has been assembled around her name, emanating,
first, from her relatives, secondly, from her followers and admirers, and
thirdly, from her critics. Her life, up to the age of forty-two, narrowly
escaped consignment to the realm of mythology, if not total oblivion, but was
at least partially redeemed to the status of history by the exertions of Mr. A.
P. Sinnett, who procured information from members of her own family in Russia.
His book, Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, has been our chief
source of information about her youth and early career. The Countess
Wachtmeister's Reminiscences, Col. Olcott's Old Diary Leaves, V.
Solovyoff's A Modern Priestess of Isis and William Kingsland's The
Real Helena P. Blavatsky, together with Madame Blavatsky's own letters,
especially those to Mr. And Mrs. A. P. Sinnett, are the main works relied upon
to guide our
43
story. If the eventful life of our subject is to be further redeemed from
mystery and sheer tradition into which it already seems to be fading, a more
thorough critical study of it should be undertaken, based upon authentic data
collected from first-hand sources as far as this is possible.
It is to be understood, then, that the aim in this treatise is to present her
career as it is told and believed by Theosophists, although it is admittedly
already partly legendary. The precise extent it is to be regarded as
mythological must be left to the individual reader, and to future study, to
determine.
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was born in the Ukrainian city of Ekaterinoslaw on
the night between the 30th and 31st of July, 1831. Her father was Col. Peter
Hahn, and her mother previous to her marriage, Helene Fadeef. The father was
the son of Gen. Alexis Hahn von Rottenstern Hahn, from a noble family of
Mecklenberg, Germany, settled in Russia. Her mother's parents were Privy
Councillor Andrew Fadeef and the Princess Helene Dolgorouky. Madame Blavatsky's
grandfather was a cousin of Countess Ida Hahn-Hahn, the authoress. Her own
mother was known in the literary world between 1830 and 1840 under the nom de
plume of Zenaïda R.--the first novel writer that had ever appeared in Russia,
says the account. Though she died before her twenty-fifth year, she left some
dozen novels of the romantic school, most of which have been translated into
German. The theory of heredity would thus give us, apparently, abundant
background for whatever literary propensities the daughter was later to
display. On her mother's side she was a scion of the noble lineage of the
Dolgorouky's, who could trace direct connections with Russia's founder, Rurik,
and the Imperial line.
Madame Blavatsky came on to the Russian scene during a year fatal to the Slavic
nation, as to all Europe, owing to the decimation of the population by the
first visitation of the cholera. Her own birth was quickened by several deaths
in the household. She was ushered into the world amid coffins and sorrowing. The
infant was so sickly that a hurried baptism was resorted to in the effort to
anticipate death. During
44
the ceremony, which was signalized with elaborate Greek Catholic paraphernalia
of lighted tapers, the child-aunt of the baby accidentally set fire to the long
robes of the priest, who was severely burned. This incident was interpreted as
a bad omen, and in the eyes of the townsfolk the infant was doomed to a life of
trouble.
From the very date of her birth, a peculiar tradition operated to invest the
life of the growing child with an odor of superstition and mystic awe. In
Russia each household was supposed to be under the tutelary supervision of a
Domovoy, or house goblin, whose guardianship was propitious, except on March
30th, when, for mysterious reasons, he became mischievous. But the tradition
strangely excepted from this malevolent spell of the Domovoy those born on the
night of July 30-31, a time closely associated in the annals of popular belief
with witches and their doings. The child came early to learn why it was that,
on every recurring March 30th, she was carried around the house, stables and
cowpen and made personally to sprinkle the four corners with water, while the
nurse repeated some mystic incantation. Her first conscious recognition of
herself must thus have been tinged with a feeling that she was in some
particular fashion set apart, that she was somehow the object of special care
and attention from invisible powers.
The Dnieper aided in weaving a spell of enchantment about her infancy. No
Cossack of Southern Ukraine ever crosses it without preparing himself for
death. Along its banks, where the child strolled with her nurses, the Rusalky
(undines, nymphs) haunted the willow trees and the rushes. She was told that
she was impervious to their influences, and in this sense of superiority she
alone dared to approach those sandy shores. She had heard the servants' tales
of these nymphs. Filled with this realization of her favored standing with the
Rusalky, she one day threatened a youngster who had roused her displeasure that
she would have the nymphs tickle him to death, whereupon the lad ran wildly
away and was found dead on the sands--whether from fright or from having
stumbled into one of the treach-
45
erous sandpits which the swirling waters quickly turn into whirlpools.
Her mother died when Mlle. Hahn was still a child. She and her younger sister
were taken to live with her father, in barracks with his regiment, and until
the age of eleven, they were entertained, amused and spoiled as les enfants
du régiment. After that they went to live at Saratow with their
grandmother, where their grandfather was civil governor. The child was
"alternately petted and punished, spoiled and hardened," and was
difficult to manage. She was of uncertain health, "ever sick and
dying," a sleep walker, and given to abnormal psychic peculiarities,
ascribed by her orthodox nurses to possession by the devil; so that, as she
afterwards said, "she was drenched with enough holy water to float a
ship," and exorcised by priests. She was a born rebel against restraint,
and went into ungovernable fits of passion, which left her violently shaken;
but at the opposite apogee of her disposition she was filled with impulses of
the extremest kindliness and affection. Through life she had this dual temper.
Those who knew her better nature tolerated the irascible element. She was
lively, highly-gifted, full of humor, and of remarkable doing. She had a
passionate curiosity for everything savoring of the weird, the uncanny, the
mysterious; she was strangely attracted by the theme of death. Her imagination,
wildly roaming, appeared to create about her a world of fairy or elfish
creatures with whom she held converse in whispers by the hour. She defied all
and everything. She had to be watched lest she escape from the house and mingle
with ragged urchins. She preferred to listen to the tales of Madame Peigneur
(her governess) than do her lessons. She would openly rebel against her
text-books and run off to the woods or hide in the dusky corridors of the
basement of the great house where her grandfather lived. In a secluded dark
recess in the "Catacombs" she had erected a barrier of old broken
chairs and tables, and there, up near the ceiling under an iron-barred window,
she would secrete herself for hours, reading a book of popular legends known as
Solomon's Wisdom. At times she bent to her books in a
46
spasm of scholarly devotion to amend for mischief making. Her grandparents'
enormous library was then the object of her constant interest. No less
passionately would she drink in the wonders of narratives given in her
presence. Every fairy-tale became a living event to her.
She would be found speaking to the stuffed animals and birds in the museum in
the old house. She said the pigeons were cooing fairy-tales to her. She heard a
voice in every natural object; nature was animate and, to her, articulate. She
seemed to know the inner life and secrets of every species of insect, bird, and
reptile found about the place. She would recreate their past and describe
vividly their feelings. At this early date she detailed the events of the past
incarnations of the stuffed animals in the museum.
Times without number the little girl was heard conversing with playmates of her
own age, invisible to others. There was in particular a little hunchback boy, a
favorite phantom companion of her solitude, for whose neglect by the servants
and nurses she was often excited to resentment.
"But amidst the strange double life she thus led from her earliest
recollections, she would sometimes have visions of a mature protector, whose
imposing appearance dominated her imagination from a very early period. This
protector was always the same, his features never changed; in after life she
met him as a living man and knew him as though she had been brought up in his
presence."1
In the neighborhood of the residence was an old man, a magician, whose doings
filled the mind of the young seeress with wonder. The old man, a centenarian,
learned to know the young girl and he used to say of her: "This little
lady is quite different from all of you. There are great events lying in wait
for her in the future. I feel sorry in thinking that I will not live to see my
predictions of her verified; but they will all come to pass!"
Her whole career is dotted with miraculous escapes from
______________
1 Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, by A. P. Sinnett
(Theosophical Publishing Society, London, 1913), p. 35. See also footnote at
bottom of page 155, in Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett (New
York, Frederick A. Stokes Co.,
47
danger and still more miraculous recoveries from wounds, sicknesses and fevers.
One of the first appearances of a protective hand in her life came far back in
her childhood. She had always entertained a marked curiosity about a curtained
portrait in her grandfather's castle at Saratow. It was hung so high that it
was far beyond her reach. Denied permission to see it, she awaited her
opportunity to catch a glimpse of it by stealth; and when left alone on one
occasion she dragged a table to the wall, set another table on that, and a
chair on top, and managed to clamber up. On tiptoe she just contrived to pull
back the curtain. The sight of the picture was so startling that she made an
involuntary movement backwards, lost her balance and toppled with her pyramid
to the floor. In falling she lost consciousness; but when she came to her
senses some moments afterwards, she was amazed to see the tables, chairs, and
everything in proper order in the room. The curtain was slipped back again on
the rings, and no mark of the episode was left except the imprint of her small
hand on the wall high up beside the picture.
At another time, when she was nearing the age of fourteen, her riding horse
bolted and flung her, with her foot caught in the stirrup. As the animal
plunged forward she expected to be dragged to death, but felt herself buoyed up
by a strange force, and escaped without a scratch.
It was not many years more until the young girl's possession of gifts and
extraordinary faculties, commonly classed as mediumistic, became an admitted
fact among her relatives and close associates. She would answer questions
locating lost property, or solving other perplexities of the household. She
sometimes blurted out to visitors that they would die, or meet with misfortune
or accident; and her prophecies usually came true.
In 1844 the father, Col. Hahn, took Helena for her first journey abroad. She
went with him to Paris and London, but proved a troublesome charge.
Her youthful marriage deserves narration with some fulness, if only because it
precipitated the lady out of her home
48
and into that phase of her career which has been referred to as her period of
preparation and apprenticeship. As her aunt, Madame Fadeef, describes her
marriage:
"she cared not whether she should get married or not. She had been simply
defied one day by her governess to find any man who would be her husband, in
view of her temper and disposition. The governess, to emphasize the taunt, said
that even the old man she had found so ugly and had laughed at so much calling
him a 'plumeless raven,' that even he would decline her for his wife. That was
enough; three days afterwards she made him propose, and then, frightened at
what she had done, sought to escape from her joking acceptance of his offer.
But it was too late. All she knew and understood was--when too late--that she
was now forced to accept a master she cared nothing for, nay, that she hated;
that she was tied to him by the law of the country, hand and foot. A 'great
horror' crept upon her, as she explained it later; one desire, ardent,
unceasing, irresistible, got hold of her entire being, led her on, so to say,
by the hand, forcing her to act instinctively, as she would have done if, in
the act of saving her life, she had been running away from a mortal danger.
There had been a distinct attempt to impress her with the solemnity of
marriage, with her future obligations and her duties to her husband and married
life. A few hours later at the altar she heard the priest saying to her: 'Thou
shalt honor and obey thy husband,' and at this hated word 'shalt' her young
face--for she was hardly seventeen--was seen to flush angrily, then to become
deadly pale. She was overheard to mutter in response through her set
teeth--'Surely I shall not.'
"And surely she has not. Forthwith she determined to take the law and her
future life into her own hands, and--she left her husband forever, without
giving him an opportunity to ever even think of her as his wife.
"Thus Madame Blavatsky abandoned her country at seventeen and passed ten
long years in strange and out-of-the-way places,--in Central Asia, India, South
America, Africa and Eastern Europe."2
True, before taking this drastic step she acceded to her father's plea to do
the conventional thing; and she let the old General take her, though even then
not without attempts to escape, on what may by courtesy of language be called a
______________
2 Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, by A. P. Sinnett, pp.
39-40.
49
honeymoon, which drawled out, amid bickerings, to a length of three months, and
was terminated after a bitter quarrel by the bride's dash for freedom on
horseback. Gen. Blavatsky by this time saw the impossibility of the situation
and acceded to the inevitable.
Tracing the life of Madame Blavatsky from this event through her
personally-conducted globe-roaming becomes difficult, owing to the meagreness
of information. Her relatives and her later Theosophic associates have done
their best to piece together the crazy-quilt design of her wanderings and
attendant events of any significance. She herself kept no chronicle of her
journeys, and it was only at long intervals, when she emerged out of the
deserts or jungles of a country to visit its metropolis, or when she needed to
write for money, that she sent letters back home. The family was at first
alarmed by her defection from the fireside, but were constrained to acquiesce
in the situation by their recognition of her immitigable distaste for her
veteran husband. If no other tie kept her attached to the home circle, her need
of funds obliged her to keep in touch with her father, who supplied her with
money without betraying her confidences as to her successive destinations. He
acceded to her plans because he had tried in vain to secure a Russian divorce;
and he felt that a few years of travel for his daughter might best ease the
family situation. Ten years elapsed before the fugitive saw her relatives
again.
Her first emergence after her disappearance was in Egypt. She seems to have
traveled there with a Countess K------, and at that time began to pick up some
occult teaching of a poorer sort. She encountered an old Copt, a man with a
great reputation as a magician. She proved an apt pupil, and the instructor
became so much interested in her that when she revisited Egypt years later, the
special attention he (then a retired ascetic) showed her, attracted the notice
of the populace at Bulak.
After her appearance in Egypt she seems to have bobbed up in Paris, where she
made the acquaintance of many literary people, and where a famous mesmerist,
struck with
50
her psychic gifts, was eager to put her to work as a sensitive. To escape his
importunities she appears to have gone to London. There she stayed for a time
with an old Russian lady, a Countess B., at Mivart's Hotel. She remained for
some time after her friend's departure, but could not afterwards recall where
she resided.
Occasionally in her travels she fell in with fellow Russians who were glad to
accompany her and sometimes to befriend her. She indulged in a tour about
Europe in 1850 with the Countess B., but was again in Paris when the New Year
of 1851 was acclaimed. Her next move was actuated by a passionate interest in
the North American Indians, which she had acquired from a perusal of Fenimore
Cooper's Leatherstocking Tales. Her zeal in this pursuit took her to
Canada in July of 1851. At Quebec her idealizations suffered a rude shock,
when, being introduced to a party of Indians, both the noble Redskins and some
articles of her property disappeared while she was trying to pry from the
squaws a recital of the secret powers of their medicine men. Dropping the
Indians, she turned her interest to the rising sect of the Mormons, being attracted
doubtless by their possession of an alleged Hermetic document obtained through
psychic revelation. But the destruction of the original Mormon city of Nauvoo,
Missouri, by a mob, scattered the sect across the plains, and Madame Blavatsky
thought the time propitious for exploring the traditions and arcana of Mexico.
She came to New Orleans. Here the Voodoo practices of a settlement of Negroes
from the West Indies engaged her interest, and her reckless curiosity might
have led her into dangerous contact with these magicians; but her protective
power reappeared to warn her in a vision of the risk she was running, and she
hastened on to new experiences.
Through Texas she reached Mexico, protected only by her own reckless daring and
by the occasional intercession of some chance companion. She seems to have owed
much in this way to an old Canadian, Père Jacques, who steered her safely
through many perils.
51
At Copau in Mexico she chanced to meet a Hindu, who styled himself a
"chela" of the Masters (or adepts in Oriental occult science), and
she resolved to seek that land of mystic enchantment and penetrate northward
into the very lairs of the mystic Brotherhood. She wrote to an Englishman, whom
she had met two years before in Germany, and who shared her interest, to join
them in the West Indies. Upon his arrival the three pilgrims took boat for
India. The party arrived at Bombay, via the Cape to Ceylon, near the end of
1852. Madame's own headstrong bent to enter Tibet via Nepal in search of her
Mahatmas broke up the trio. She made the hazardous attempt to enter the
Forbidden Land of the Lamas, but was prevented, she always believed, by the
opposition of a British resident then in Nepal. Baffled, she returned to
Southern India, thence to Java and Singapore and thence back to England.
But that country's embroilment in the Crimean War distressed her sense of
patriotism, and about the end of the year 1853 she passed over again to
America, going to New York, thence west to Chicago and on to the Far West
across the Rockies with emigrant caravans. She halted a while at San Francisco.
Her stay in America this time lengthened to nearly two years. She then once
more made her way to India, via Japan and the Straits. She reached Calcutta in
1855.
In India, in 1856, she was joined at Lahore by a German gentleman who had been
requested by Col. Hahn to find his errant daughter. With him and his two
companions Madame Blavatsky traveled through Kashmir to Leli in Ladakh in
company with a Tatar Shaman, who was instrumental in procuring for the party
the favor of witnessing some magic rites performed at a Buddhist monastery. Her
experiences there she afterwards described in Isis,3 and they are too
long for recital here. One of the exploits of the old priest was the psychic
vivification of the body of an infant who (not yet of walking age) arose and
spoke eloquently of spiritual things and prophesied, while dominated
______________
3 Vol. II, p. 599.
52
by a magnetic current from the operator.4 The psychic feat performed by her Shaman
guide was even more wonderful. Yielding to Madame's importunities at a time
when she was herself in grave danger, he released himself from his body as he
lay in a tent, and carried a message to a friend of the young woman residing in
Wallachia, from whom he brought back an answer.5 Shortly after this incident,
perceiving their danger, the Shaman, by mental telepathy apprised a friendly
tribal ruler of their situation, and a band of twenty-five horsemen was sent to
rescue the two travelers, finding them in a locality to which they had been
directed by their chief, yet of which the two had had no possible earthly means
of informing him.
Safely out of the Tibetan wilds--and she came out by roads and passes of which
she had no previous knowledge--she was directed by her occult guardian to leave
the country, shortly before the troubles which began in 1857. In 1858 she was
once more in Europe.
By this time her name had accumulated some renown, and it was freely mentioned
in connection with both the low and the high life of Vienna, Berlin, Warsaw,
and Paris. Her alleged absence from these places at the times throws doubt on
the accuracy of these reports. After spending some months in France and Germany
upon her return from India, she finally ended her self-imposed exile and
rejoined her own people in Russia, arriving at Pskoff, about 180 miles from St.
Petersburg, in the midst of a family wedding party on Christmas night. Her
reason for going to Pskoff was that her sister Vera--then Madame Yahontoff--was
at the
______________
4 Her recital of marvels seen in Tibet corresponds in the main with similar
narratives related by the Abbé Huc in the first edition of his Recollections
of Travel in Tartary, Tibet and China. Mr. Sinnett makes the
statement, without giving his evidence, that the "miracles" related
by the Abbé in his first edition were expurgated by Catholic authority in the
later editions of the work.
5 Madame Blavatsky later verified the long distance phenomenon by receiving in
writing, in response to an inquiry by mail, a letter from the Rumanian friend
stating that at the identical time of the Shaman's concentration she had
swooned, but dreamed she saw Madame Blavatsky in a tent in a wild country among
menacing tribes, and that she had communicated with her. Madame Blavatsky
states that the friend's astral form was visible in the tent.
53
time residing there with the family of her late husband, son of the General N.
A. Yahontoff, Marechal de Noblesse of the place.
Soon afterwards, early in 1859, Madame Blavatsky and her sister went to reside
with their father in a country house belonging to Madame Yahontoff. This was at
Rougodevo, about 200 versts from St. Petersburg. About a year later, in the
spring of 1860, both sisters left Rougodevo for the Caucasus on a visit to
their grandparents, whom they had not seen for years. It was a three weeks'
journey from Moscow to Tiflis, in coach with post horses. Madame Blavatsky
remained in Tiflis less than two years, adding another year of roaming about in
Imeretia, Georgia, and Mingrelia, exciting the superstitious sensibilities of
the inhabitants of the Mingrelia region to an inordinate degree and gaining a
reputation for witchcraft and sorcery. She was there taken down with a wasting
fever, which an old army surgeon could make nothing of; but he had the good
sense to send her off to Tiflis to her friends. Recovering after a time, she
left the Caucasus and went to Italy. Here, the legend goes, she, with some
other European women, volunteered to serve with Garibaldi and was under severe
fire in the battle of Mentana.6
The four years intervening between 1863 and 1867 seem to have been spent in
European travel, though the records are barren of accurate detail. But the
three from 1867 to 1870 were passed in the East,7 and were quite fruitful and
eventful.
______________
6 In 1873 while at the Eddy farmhouse with her new friend Col. Olcott, she
revealed to him this chapter in her life, proving it by showing him where her
left arm had been broken in two places by a saber stroke, and having him feel a
musket ball in her right shoulder and another in her leg, revealing also a scar
just below the heart where she had been stabbed by a stiletto.
7 It must have been about this time that Madame did some traveling in an altogether
different capacity than occult research. She is known by her family to have
made tours in Italy and Russia under a pseudonym, giving piano concerts. She
had been a pupil of Moscheles, and when with her father in London as a young
girl she had played at a charity concert with Madame Clara Schumann and Madame
Arabella Goddard in a piece for three pianos.
54
In 1870 she returned from the Orient, coming through the newly opened Suez
Canal, spent a short time in Piraeus, and from there took passage for Spezzia
on board a Greek vessel. On this voyage she was one of the very few saved from
death in a terrible catastrophe, the vessel being blown to bits by an explosion
of gunpowder and fireworks in the cargo. Rescued with only the clothes they
wore, the survivors were looked after by the Greek government, which forwarded
them to various destinations. Madame Blavatsky went to Alexandria and to Cairo,
tarrying at the latter place until money reached her from Russia.
While awaiting the arrival of funds, the energetic woman determined to found a Société
Spirite, for the investigation of mediums and manifestations according to
the theories and philosophy of Allen Kardec. The latter was an outstanding
advocate of Spiritualistic philosophy on the Continent. He had correlated the
commonly reported spiritistic exploits to a more profound and involved theory
of cosmic evolution and a higher spirituality in man. His work, Life and
Destiny, written under the pseudonym of Leon Denis, unfolded a
comprehensive system of spiritual truth identical in its main features with
Theosophy itself. His interests were not primarily in spiritistic phenomena for
themselves, but for what they revealed of the inner spiritual capacities and
potentialities of our evolving Psyche.
It required but a few weeks to disgust Madame Blavatsky with her fruitless
undertaking. Some French female spiritists, whom she had drafted for service as
mediums, in lack of better, proved to be adventuresses following in the wake of
M. de Lesseps' army of engineers and workmen, and they concluded by stealing
the Society's funds. She wrote home:
"To wind up the comedy with a drama, I got nearly shot by a madman--a
Greek, who had been present at the only two public séances we held, and got
possessed I suppose, by some vile spook."8
______________
8 Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, by A. P. Sinnett, p. 125.
55
She terminated the affairs of her Société and went to Bulak, where she
renewed her previous acquaintance with the old Copt. His unconcealed interest
in his visitor aroused some slanderous talk about her. Disgusted with the
growing gossip, she went home by way of Palestine, making a side voyage to
Palmyra and other ruins, and meeting there some Russian friends. At the end of
1872 she returned without warning to her family, then at Odessa.
In 1873 she again abandoned her home, and Paris was her first objective. She
stayed there with a cousin, Nicholas Hahn, for two months. While in Paris she
was directed by her "spiritual overseers" to visit the United States,
"where she would meet a man by the name of Olcott," with whom she was
to undertake an important enterprise. Obedient to her orders she arrived at New
York on July 7th, 1873.9 She was for a time practically without funds;
actually, as Col. Olcott avers, "in the most dismal want, having . . . to
boil her coffee-dregs over and over again for lack of pence for buying a fresh
supply; and to keep off starvation, at last had to work with her needle for a
maker of cravats."10 During this interval she was lodged in a wretched
tenement house in the East Side, and made cravats for a kindly old Jew, whose
help at this time she never forgot.11 In her
______________
9 An incident highly characteristic of her nature marked her coming to this
country, and her followers would hardly pardon our omitting it. Having
purchased her steamer ticket, she was about to board the vessel when her
attention was attracted to a peasant woman weeping bitterly on the wharf. Her
quick sympathies touched, Madame Blavatsky approached her and inquired the
trouble. She soon gathered that a "sharp" had sold the woman a
worthless ticket, and that she was stranded without funds. Madame Blavatsky's
finances had barely sufficed to procure her own passage, she having sent a
dispatch to Russia instructing her father to forward her additional money in
New York. In the emergency she did not hesitate. Going to the office of the
Company, she arranged to exchange her cabin ticket for two steerage ones, and
packed the grateful emigrant on board along with her.--See Old Diary Leaves,
by Col. H. S. Olcott (New York and London, G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1895), pp.
28-29.
10 Old Diary Leaves, by Col. H. S. Olcott, Vol. I, p. 440.
11 Col. Olcott (Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 440) states that during
this period of her own need she held in custody the sum of about 23,000 francs,
which she later told him her "guardians" had charged her to deliver a
person in the United States whose definite location would be given her after
her arrival here. The order came after a time, and she went to Buffalo, was
given a name and street number,
56
squalid quarters she was sought out by a veteran journalist, Miss Anna Ballard,
in search of copy for a Russian story. She received, in late October, a legacy
from the estate of her father, who had died early in that month. A draft of one
thousand rubles was first sent her, and later the entire sum bequeathed to her.
Then in affluence she moved to better quarters, first to Union Square, then to
East 16th Street, then to Irving Place. But her money did not abide in her
keeping long. In regard to the sources of her income after her patrimony had
been flung generously to the winds, we are told, upon Col. Olcott's pledged
honor, that both his and her wants, after the organization of the Theosophical
Society, were frequently provided for by the occult ministrations of the
Masters. He claims that during the many years of their joint campaigns for
Theosophy, especially in India, the treasure-chest at headquarters, after
having been depleted, would be found supplied with funds from unknown sources.
Shopping one day in New York with Colonel, she made purchases to the amount of
about fifty dollars. He paid the bills. On returning home she thrust some
banknotes into his hand, saying: "There are your fifty dollars." He
is certain she had no money of her own, and no visitor had come in from whom
she could have borrowed. Once during this period she created the duplicate of a
thousand dollar note while it was held in the hand of the Hon. John L. O'Sullivan,
formerly Ambassador to Portugal; but it faded away during the two following
days. Its serial number was identical with that of its prototype. The knowledge
that financial help would come at need, however, did not dispose Madame
Blavatsky to relax her effort toward her own sustenance.12 During this time,
and for nearly all the remainder of her life, the Russian noblewoman spent
large stretches
______________
where she delivered the money without question to a man who was on the point of
committing suicide. It was understood that she had been made the agent of
rectifying a great wrong done him.
12 Mr. O'Sullivan rallied her about her possession of so easy a road to wealth.
"No, indeed," she answered, "'tis but a psychological trick. We
who have the power of doing this, dare not use it for our own or any other's
interests, any more than you would dare commit the forgery by methods of the
counterfeiters. It would be stealing from the government in either
case."--Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 435.
57
of her time in writing occult, mystic, and scientific articles for Russian
periodicals. This constituted her main source of income. Col. Olcott states
that her Russian articles were so highly prized that "the conductor of the
most important of their reviews actually besought her to write constantly for
it, on terms as high as they gave Turgenev."13
A chronicle of her life during this epoch may not omit her second marriage,
which proved ill-fated at the first. It came about as follows: A Mr. B., a
Russian subject, learning of her psychic gifts through Col. Olcott, asked the
Colonel to arrange for him a meeting with his countrywoman. He proceeded to
fall into a profound state of admiration for Madame Blavatsky, which deepened
though he was persistently rebuffed, and he finally threatened to take his life
unless she would relent. He proclaimed his motives to be only protective, and
expressly waived a husband's claims to the privileges of married life. In what
appears to have been madness or some sort of desperation, she agreed finally,
on these terms, to be his wife. Even then it was specified that she retain her
own name and be free from all restraint, for the sake of her work. A Unitarian
clergyman married them in Philadelphia, and they lived for some few months in a
house on Sansom Street. When taken to task by her friend Olcott, she explained
that it was a misfortune to which she was doomed by an inexorable Karma; that
it was a punishment to her for a streak of pride which was hindering her
spiritual development; but that it would result in no harm to the young man.
The husband forgot his earlier protestations of Platonic detachment, and became
an importunate lover. Madame Blavatsky developed a dangerous illness at this
time as a result of a fall upon an icy sidewalk in New York the previous
winter, and her knee became so violently inflamed that a partial mortification
of the leg set in. The physician declared that nothing but instant amputation
could save her life; but she discarded his advice, called upon that source of
help which had come to her in a number of exigencies, recovered immediately and
left her
______________
13 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I., p. 106.
58
husband's "bed and board." He, after some months of waiting, saw her
obduracy and procured a divorce on the ground of desertion.14
During the latter part of her stay in New York she and Col. Olcott took an
apartment of seven rooms at the corner of 47th Street and 8th Avenue, which
came to be called "The Lamasery," in jocular reference to her Tibetan
connections. "The Lamasery" became a social and intellectual center
during her residence there. Col. Olcott says:
". . . her mirthfulness, epigrammatic wit, brilliance of conversation,
careless friendliness to those she liked . . ., her fund of anecdote, and,
chiefest attraction to most of her callers, her amazing psychical phenomena,
made the 'Lamasery' the most attractive salon of the metropolis from 1876 to
the close of 1878."15
Madame spent her day-hours in writing, her custom for years; and held open
house for visitors in the evening. There was always discussion of one or
another aspect of occult philosophy, in which she naturally took the commanding
part. She would pour out an endless flow of argument and supporting data,
augmented at favorable times by a sudden exhibition of magical power. She
seemed tireless in her psychic energy.
Several persons have left good word-pictures of her. Col. Olcott graphically
describes her appearance upon the occasion of their first meeting in the old
Eddy farmhouse, in Vermont, where they both came in '74 to study the
"spooks." Col. Olcott had been on the scene for some time, as a
representative of the New York Daily Graphic, when Madame Blavatsky
arrived. He was struck by her general appearance, and he contrived to introduce
himself to her through the medium of a gallant offer of a light for her
cigarette.
"It was a massive Kalmuc face," he writes, "contrasting in its
suggestion of power, culture and impressiveness, as strangely with the
commonplace visages about the room, as her red garment did
______________
14 Mr. W. Q. Judge as her counsel and the decree was granted on May 25, 1878.
Col. Olcott had retained the original papers in the case.
15 Old Diary Letters, Vol. I, p. 417.
59
with the gray and white tones of the wall and the woodwork, and the dull
costumes of the rest of the guests. All sorts of cranky people were continually
coming and going at Eddy's, and it only struck me, on seeing this eccentric
lady, that this was but one more of the sort. Pausing on the doorstep I
whispered to Kappes, 'Good Gracious! Look at that specimen, will you!'"16
In her autobiography the Princess Helene von Racowitza makes some interesting
references to Madame Blavatsky, whom she knew intimately.
"I discovered in her the most remarkable being (for one hardly dare
designate her with the simple name of woman). She gave me new life; . . . she
brought new interest into my existence. Regarding her personal appearance, the
head, which rose from the dark flowing garments, was immensely characteristic,
although far more ugly than beautiful. A true Russian type, a short thick nose,
prominent cheek bones, a small clever mobile mouth, with little fine teeth,
brown and very curly hair, and almost like that of a negro's; a sallow
complexion, but a pair of eyes the like of which I had never seen; pale blue,
grey as water, but with a glance deep and penetrating, and as compelling as if
it beheld the inner heart of things. Sometimes they held an expression as
though fixed on something afar, high and immeasurably above all earthly things.
She always wore long dark flowing garments and had ideally beautiful hands.
"But how shall I attempt to describe . . . her being, her power, her
abilities and her character? She was a combination of the most heterogeneous
qualities. By all she was considered as a sort of Cagliostro or St. Germain.
She conversed with equal facility in Russian, English, French, German, Italian
and certain dialects of Hindustani; yet she lacked all positive knowledge--even
the most superficial European school training.
"In matters of social life she . . . joined an irresistible charm in
conversation, that comprised chiefly an intense comprehension of everything
noble and great, with the most original and often coarse humor, a mode of
expression which was the comical despair of prudish Anglo-Saxons.
"Her contempt for and rebellion against all social conventions made her
appear sometimes even coarser than was her wont, and she hated and fought
conventional lying with real Don Quixotic
______________
16 Ibid., p. 4.
60
courage. But whoever approached her in poverty or rags, hungry and needing
comfort, could be sure to find in her a warm heart and an open hand. . . . No
drop of wine, beer or fermented liquors ever passed her lips, and she had a most
fanatical hatred of everything intoxicating. Her hospitality was genuinely
Oriental. She placed everything she possessed at the disposal of her
friends."17
Mr. J. Ranson Bridges, a none too kindly critic, who had considerable
correspondence with her from 1888 till her death, says:
"Whatever may be the ultimate verdict upon the life and work of this
woman, her place in history will be unique. There was a Titanic display of
strength in everything she did. The storms that raged within her were cyclones.
Those exposed to them often felt, with Solovyoff, that if there were holy and
sage Mahatmas, they could not remain holy and sage and have anything to do with
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. Yet she could be as tender and sympathetic as any
mother. Her mastery of some natures seemed complete. . . . To these disciples
she was the greatest thaumaturgist known to the world since the time of
Christ."18
In a moment of gayety she once dashed off the following description of herself:
"An old woman, whether 40, 50, 60 or 90 years old, it matters not; an old
woman whose Kalmuco-Buddhisto-Tartaric features, even in youth, never made her
appear pretty; a woman whose ungainly garb, uncouth manners, and masculine
habits are enough to frighten any bustled and corseted fine lady of fashionable
society out of her wits."19
For all her psychic insight, she seemed unable to protect herself against those
who fawned upon her, cultivated her society, and then repaid her by desertion
or slander. She was open to any one who professed occult interest, and she
readily took up with many such persons who later became bitter critics.
Much ado was made by delicate ladies in her day of her
______________
17 Published by The Constables, London, 1910.
18 The Arena, April, 1895.
19 Quoted in Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 4 (footnote), from a letter
written by her entitled "The Knout" to the R. P. Journal of
March 16, 1878.
61
cigarette addiction. Her evident masculinity, her lack of many of the niceties
which ladies commonly affect, her scorn of conventions, her failure to put on
the airs of a woman of noble rank, her occasional coarse language, and her
violence of temper over petty things, have led many people to infer that the
message that she brought could not have been pure and lofty.
Theosophists put forward an explanation of her irascibility and nervous
instability, in a theory which must sound exotic to the uninitiated. They state
that when she studied in Tibet under her Masters, and was initiated into the
mysteries of their occult knowledge, they extricated, by processes in which
they are alleged to be adepts, one of her astral bodies and retained it so as
to be able to maintain, through an etheric radio vibration, a constant line of
communication with her in any part of the world. This left her in a state of
unstable equilibrium nervously, and rendered her subject to a greater degree of
irritation than would normally have been the case.
Madame Blavatsky's life story, covered now in its outward phases, is not
complete without consideration of that remarkable series of psychic phenomena
which give inner meaning to her career. In and of themselves they form a
narrative of great interest, on a par with the legendary lives of many other
saints. The story is a long one; a complete record of all her wonder-working,
as told in the Theosophic accounts, would alone fill the space of this volume.
A digest of this material must be made here, though a critical examination is,
as said above, not attempted.
When, in 1858, she returned home from her first exile of ten years,
Spiritualism was just looming on the horizon of Europe. Nothing seems to be
mentioned in the several biographical sketches, of her coming in contact with
the sweep of the Spiritualistic wave that was at full height in the United States
during the early fifties, when she passed through that country. However the
case may be, she returned home in 1858 with her occult powers already fully
developed, and proceeded to make frequent display of them.
62
At Pskoff, with her sister's husband's family, the Yahontoff's, raps, knocks,
and other sounds occurred incessantly; furniture moved without any contact;
particles changed their weight; and either absent living folk or the dead were
seen both by herself and her relatives many times. Wherever the young woman
went "things" happened. Laughing at the continued recurrence of these
mysterious activities, she averred to her sisters that she could make them
cease or redouble their frequency and power, by the sheer force of her own
will.20 The psychic demonstrations supposedly took place in entire independence
of her coöperation, but she could, if she chose, interject her will and assume
control. Her sister, Madame de Jelihowsky, remembers Helena's laughing when
addressed as a medium, and assuring her friends that "she was no medium,
but only a mediator between mortals and beings we know nothing about."21
The reports of her wonderful exploits following her arrival at Pskoff in 1858
threw that town into a swirl of excited gossip. There was a great deal of
fashionable company at the Yahontoff home in those days. Madame's presence
itself attracted many. Seldom did any of the numerous callers go away
unsatisfied, for to their inquiries the raps gave answer, often long ones in
different languages, some of which were not in Madame Blavatsky's repertoire.
The willing "medium" was subjected to every kind of test, to which
she submitted gracefully.
An instance of her power was her mystification of her own brother, Leonide de
Hahn. A company was gathered in the drawing room, and Leonide was walking
leisurely about, unconcerned with the stunts which his gifted sister was
producing for the diversion of the visitors. He stopped behind the girl's chair
just as some one was telling how magicians
______________
20 Mr. Sinnett (Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, Chapter VI)
emphasizes the fact that she was about this time in a transition state from
passive mediumship to active control over her phenomena. He doubtless wishes to
make this matter clear in view of its important bearing upon the divergence
between Spiritualism and Theosophy which was accentuated when the latter put
forth claims somewhat at variance with the usual theses presented by the
former.
21 Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, p. 61.
63
change the avoirdupois of objects. "And you mean to say that you can do
it?" he asked his sister ironically. "Mediums can, and I have done it
occasionally," was the reply. "But would you try?" some one
asked. "I will try, but promise nothing." Hereupon one of the young
men advanced and lifted a light chess table with great ease. Madame then told
them to leave it alone and stand back. She was not near it herself. In the
expectant silence that ensued she merely looked intently at the table. Then she
invited the same young man who had just lifted it to do so again. He tried,
with great assurance of his ability, but could not stir the table an inch. He
grew red with the effort, but without avail. The brother, thinking that his
sister had arranged the play with his friend as a little joke on him, now
advanced. "May I also try?" he asked her. "Please do, my
dear," she laughed. He seized the table and struggled; whereat his smile
vanished. Try as he would, his effort was futile. Others tried it with the same
result. After a while Helena urged Leonide to try it once more. He lifted it
now with no effort.
A few months later, Madame Blavatsky, her father and sister, having left Pskoff
and lodging at a hotel in St. Petersburg, were visited by two old friends of
Col. Hahn, both now much interested in Spiritualism. After witnessing some of
Helena's performances, the two guests expressed great surprise at the father's
continued apathy toward his daughter's abilities. After some bantering they
began to insist that he should at least consent to an experiment, before
denying the importance of the phenomena. They suggested that he retire to an
adjoining room, write a word on a slip of paper, conceal it and see if his
daughter could persuade the raps to reveal it. The old gentleman consented,
believing he could discredit the foolish nonsense, as he termed it, once for
all. He retired, wrote the word and returned, venturing in his confidence the
assertion that if this experiment were successful, he "would believe in
the devil, undines, sorcerers, and witches, in the whole paraphernalia, in
short, of old woman's superstitions; and you may prepare to offer me as
64
an inmate of a lunatic asylum."22 He went on with his solitaire in a
corner, while the friends took note of the raps now beginning. The younger
sister was repeating the alphabet, the raps sounding at the desired letter; one
of the visitors marked it down. Madame Blavatsky did nothing apparently. By
this means one single word was got, but it seemed so grotesque and meaningless
that a sense of failure filled the minds of the experimenters. Questioning
whether that one word was the entire message, the raps sounded
"Yes--yes--yes!" The younger girl then turned to her father and told
them that they had got but one word. "Well what is it?" he demanded.
"Zaïchik."23 It was a sight indeed to witness the change that came
over the old man's face at hearing this one word. He became deadly pale.
Adjusting his spectacles with a trembling hand, he stretched it out, saying,
"Let me see it! Hand it over. Is it really so?" He took the slips of
paper and read in a very agitated voice "Zaïchik." Yes; Zaïchik; so
it is. How very strange!" Taking out of his pocket the paper he had
written on in the next room, he handed it in silence to his daughter and
guests. On it they found he had written: "What was the name of my favorite
horse which I rode during my first Turkish campaign?" And lower down, in
parenthesis, the answer,--" Zaïchik."
The old Colonel, now assured there was more than child's play in his daughter's
pretensions, rushed into the region of phenomena with great zeal. He did not
matriculate at an asylum; instead he set Helena to work investigating his
family tree. He was stimulated to this inquiry by having received the date of a
certain event in his ancestral history of several hundred years before, which
he verified by reference to old documents. Scores of historical events
connected with his family were now given him; names unheard of, relationships
unknown, positions held, marriages, deaths; and all were found on painstaking
research to have been correct in every item! All this information was given
rapidly and unhesitatingly. The investigation lasted for months.
______________
22 Ibid., p. 72.
23 In Russian, "little hare."
65
In the spring of 1858 both sisters were living with their father in the
country-house in a village belonging to Mme. Yahontoff. In consequence of a
murder committed near their property, the Superintendent of the District Police
passed through the villages and stopped at their house to make some inquiries.
No one in the village knew who had committed the crime. During tea, as all were
sitting around the table, the raps came, and there were the usual disturbances
around the room. Col. Hahn suggested to the Superintendent that he had better
try his daughter's invisible helpers for information. He laughed incredulously.
He had heard of "spirits," he said, but was derisive of their ability
to give information in "a real case." This scorn of her powers caused
the young girl to desire to humble the arrogant officer. She turned fiercely
upon him. "And suppose I prove to you the contrary?" she defiantly
asked him. "Then," he answered, "I would resign my office and
offer it to you, Madame, or, better still, I would strongly urge the
authorities to place you at the head of the Secret Police Department."
"Now look here, Captain," she said indignantly. "I do not like
meddling in such dirty business and helping you detectives. Yet, since you defy
me, let my father say over the alphabet and you put down the letters and record
what will be rapped out. My presence is not needed for this, and with your
permission I shall even leave the room." She went out, with a book, to
read. The inquiry in the next room produced the name of the murderer, the fact
that he had crossed over into the next district and was then hiding in the hay
in the loft of a peasant, Andrew Vlassof, in the village of Oreshkino. Further
information was elicited to the effect that the murderer was an old soldier on
leave; he was drunk and had quarreled with his victim. The murder was not
premeditated; rather a misfortune than a crime. The Superintendent rushed
precipitately out of the house and drove off to Oreshkino, more than 30 miles
distant. A letter came by courier the following morning saying that everything
given by the raps had proved absolutely correct. This incident produced a great
uproar in the district and Madame's work was viewed
66
in a more serious light. Her family, however, had some difficulty convincing
the more distant authorities that they had no natural means of being familiar
with the crime.
One evening while all sat in the dining room, loud chords of music were struck
on the closed piano in the next room, visible to all through the open door. On
another occasion Madame's tobacco pouch, her box of matches and her
handkerchief came rushing to her through the air, upon a mere look from her.
Many visitors to her apartment in later years witnessed this same procedure.
Again, one evening, all lights were suddenly extinguished, an amazing noise was
heard, and though a match was struck in a moment, all the heavy furniture was
found overturned on the floor. The locked piano played a loud march. The
manifestations taking place when the home circle was unmixed with visitors were
usually of the most pronounced character.
Sometimes there were alleged communications from the spirits of historical
personages, not the inevitable Napoleon and Cleopatra, but Socrates, Cicero and
Martin Luther, and they ranged from great power and vigor of thought to almost
flippant silliness. Some from the shade of the Russian poet Pushkin were quite
beautiful.
While the family read aloud the Memoirs of Catherine Romanovna Dashkoff,
they were interrupted many times by the alleged spirit of the authoress
herself, interjecting remarks, making additions, offering explanations and
refutations.
In the early part of 1859 the sister, Madame Jelihowsky, inherited a country
village from the estate of her late husband at Rougodevo, and there the family,
including Helena, went to reside for a period. No one in the party had ever
known any of the previous occupants of the estate. Soon after settling down in
the old mansion, Madame discerned the shades of half a dozen of the former
inhabitants in one of the unoccupied wings and described them to her sister.
Seeking out several old servants, she found that every one of the wraiths could
be identified and named by the aged domestics. The young woman's description of
one man was
67
that he had long finger nails, like a Chinaman's. The servant stated that one
of the former residents had contracted a disease in Lithuania, which renders
cutting of the nails a certain road to death through bleeding.
Sometimes the other members of the family would converse with the rapping
forces without disturbing Helena at all. The forces played more strongly than
every, it seemed, when Madame was asleep or sick. A physician once attending
her illness was almost frightened away by the noises and moving furniture in the
bedroom.
A terrible illness befell her near the end of the stay at Rougodevo. Years
before, her relatives believed during her solitary travels over the steppes of
Asia, she had received a wound. This wound reopened occasionally, and then she
suffered intense agony, which lasted three or four days and then the wound
would heal as suddenly as it had opened, and her illness would vanish. On one
occasion a physician was called; but he proved of little use, because the
prodigious phenomena which he witnessed left him almost powerless to act.
Having examined the wound, the patient being prostrated and unconscious, he saw
a large dark hand between his own and the wound he was about to dress. The
wound was near the heart, and the hand moved back and forth between the neck
and the waist. To make the apparition worse, there came in the room a terrific
noise, from ceiling, floor, windows, and furniture, so that the poor man begged
not to be left alone in the room with the patient.
In the spring of 1860 the two sisters left Rougodevo for a visit to their
grandparents in the south of Russia, and during the long slow journey many
incidents took place. At one station, where a surly, half-drunken
station-master refused to lend them a fresh relay of horses, and there was no
fit room for their accommodation over the night, Helena terrified him into
sense and reason by whispering into his ear some strange secret of his, which
he believed no one knew and which it was to his interest to keep hidden.
At Jadonsk, where a halt was made, they attended a church service, where the
prelate, the famous and learned
68
Isidore, who had known them in childhood, recognized them and invited them to
visit him at the Metropolitan's house. He received them when they came with
great kindliness; but hardly had they entered the drawing room than a terrible
hubbub of noise and raps burst forth in every direction. Every piece of
furniture strained and cracked, rocked and thumped. The women were confused by
this demoniacal demonstration in the presence of the amazed Churchman, though
the culprit in the case was hardly able to repress her sense of humor. But the
priest saw the embarrassment of his guests and understood the cause of it. He
inquired which of the two women possessed such strange potencies. He was told.
Then he asked permission to put to her invisible guide a mental question. She
assented. His query, a serious one, received an instant reply, precise and to
the point; and he was so struck with it all that he detained his visitors for
over three hours. He continued his conversation with the unseen presences and
paid unstinted tribute to their seeming all-knowledge. His farewell words to
his gifted guest were:
"As for you, let not your heart be troubled by the gift you are possessed
of . . . for it was surely given to you for some purpose, and you could not be
held responsible for it. Quite the reverse! For if you but use it with
discrimination you will be enabled to do much good to your
fellow-creatures."
Her occult powers grew at this period to their full development, and she seemed
to have completed the subjection of every phase of manifestation to her own
volitional control. Her fame throughout the Caucasus increased, breeding both
hostility and admiration. She had risen above the necessity of resorting to the
slow process of raps, and read people's states and gave them answers through
her own clairvoyance. She seemed able, she said, to see a cloud around people
in whose luminous substance their thoughts took visible form. The purely sporadic
phenomena were dying away.
Her illness at the end of her stay in Mingrelia has already been noted. A
psychic experience of unusual nature even for
69
her, through which she passed during this severe sickness, seems to have marked
a definite epoch in her occult development. She apparently acquired the ability
from that time to step out of her physical body, investigate distant scenes or
events, and bring back reports to her normal consciousness. Sometimes she felt
herself as now one person, H. P. Blavatsky, and again some one else. Returning
to her own personality she could remember herself as the other character, but
while functioning as the other person she could not remember herself as Madame
Blavatsky. She later wrote of these experiences: "I was in another far-off
country, a totally different individuality from myself, and had no connection
at all with my actual life."24 The sickness, prostrated her and appears to
have brought a crisis in her inner life. She herself felt that she had barely escaped
the fate that she afterwards spoke of as befalling so many mediums. She wrote
in a letter to a relative:
"The last vestige of my psycho-physical weakness is gone, to return no
more. I am cleansed and purified of that dreadful attraction to myself of stray
spooks and ethereal affinities. I am free, free, thanks to Those whom I now
bless at every hour of my life." (Her Guardians in Tibet.)25
Madame Jelihowsky writes too:
"After her extraordinary and protracted illness at Tiflis she seemed to
defy and subject the manifestations entirely to her will. In short, it is the
firm belief of all that there where a less strong nature would have been surely
wrecked in the struggle, her indomitable will found somehow or other the means
of subjecting the world of the invisibles--to the denizens of which she had
ever refused the name of 'spirits' and souls--to her own control."26
As a sequel to this experience her conception of a great and definite mission
in the world formulated itself before her vision. It is seen to provide the
motive for her abortive enterprise in Cairo in 1871; it is again seen to be
operative in her propagation of Theosophy in 1875. It will be con-
______________
24 Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky, p. 116.
25 Ibid., p. 120
26 Ibid., p. 120
70
sidered more at length in the discussion of her connection with American
Spiritualism.
By 1871 her power in certain phases had been greatly enhanced. She was able,
merely by looking fixedly at objects, to set them in motion. In an illustrated
paper of the time there was a story of her by a gentleman, who met her with
some friends in a hotel at Alexandria. After dinner he engaged her in a long
discussion. Before them stood a little tea tray, on which the waiter had placed
a bottle of liquor, some wine, a wine glass and a tumbler. As the gentleman
raised the glass to his lips it broke to pieces in his hands. Madame Blavatsky
laughed at the occurrence, remarking that she hated liquor and could hardly
tolerate those who drank. He knew the glass was thick and strong, but, to draw
her out, declared it must have been an accidental crumbling of a thin glass in
his grasp. "What do you bet I do not do it again?" she flashed at
him. He then half-filled another tumbler. In his own words:
"But no sooner had the glass touched my lips than I felt it shattered
between my fingers, and my hand bled, wounded by a broken piece in my
instinctive act of grasping the tumbler together when I felt myself losing hold
of it."
"Entre les lèvres et la coupe, il y a quelquefois une grande
distance," she observed, and left the room, laughing in his face
"most outrageously."27
Another gentleman, a Russian, who encountered her in Egypt, sent the most
enthusiastic letters to his friends about her wonders.
"She is a marvel, an unfathomable mystery. That which she produces is
simply phenomenal; and without believing any more in spirits than I ever did, I
am ready to believe in witchcraft. If it is after all but jugglery, then we
have in Madame Blavatsky a woman who beats all the Boscos and Robert Houdin's
of the country by her address. . . . Once I showed her a closed medallion
containing a portrait of one person and the hair of another, an object which I
had had in my possession but a few months, which was made at Moscow, and of which
very few knew, and she told me
______________
27 Ibid., p. 128.
71
without touching it: 'Oh! It is your godmother's portrait and your cousin's
hair. Both are dead,' and she proceeded forthwith to describe them, as though
she had both before her eyes. How could she know?"28
At Cairo she wrote her sister Vera that she had seen the astral forms of two of
the family's domestics and chided her sister for not having written her about
their death during her absence. She described the hospital in which one of them
had passed away, and other circumstances connected with their history since she
had last been in touch with them. It was only afterwards that she learned that
when her letter from Egypt was received by Madame Jelihowsky, the latter was
herself not aware of the death of the two servants. Upon inquiry she found
every circumstance in relation to their late years and their death precisely as
Helena had depicted it.
Upon Madame Blavatsky's arrival in America her open espousal of the cause of
Theosophy was prefaced by much work done in and for the Spiritualistic
movement. Col. Olcott has brought out the fact that the phenomena taking place
at the Eddy farmhouse in Vermont in 1873 changed character quite decidedly the
day she entered the household. Up to the time of her appearance on the scene
the figures that had shown themselves were either Red Indians or Americans or
Europeans related to some one present. But on the first evening of her stay
spirits of other nationalities came up. A Georgian servant body from the
Caucasus, a Mussulman merchant from Tiflis, a Russian peasant girl, and others,
appeared. Later a Kurdish cavalier and a devilish-looking Negro sorcerer from
Africa joined the motley group.
From the Vermont homestead Madame Blavatsky went to New York, where Col. Olcott
joined her shortly afterwards. Rappings and messages were much in evidence
during this sojourn in the metropolis, the disembodied intelligence in the
background purporting to be one "John King," a name familiar to all
spiritists for many years before. The spirit finally declared itself to be the
earth-haunting soul
______________
28 Ibid., p. 127
73
of Sir Henry Morgan, famous buccaneer, and so showed itself to the sight of
Col. Olcott during the séances with the Holmes mediums some months later in
Philadelphia. From him as ostensible source came many messages both grave and
gay.
All the while Madame Blavatsky posed as a Spiritualist and mingled in the
Holmes séances in Philadelphia for the purpose of lending some of her own power
to the rather feeble demonstrations effected by Mr. and Mrs. Holmes to bolster
their reputation in the face of Robert Dale Owen's public denunciation of them
as cheats. She says that on one occasion Mrs. Holmes was herself frightened at
the real appearance of spirits summoned by herself.
One of the first indications Col. Olcott was to have of the interest of her
distant sages in his own career was shown during the time that Madame Blavatsky
was in Philadelphia. At her urgent invitation the Colonel determined quite
suddenly to run over and spend a few days with her. On the evening of the same
day on which he left his address at the Philadelphia Post Office the postman
brought him several letters from widely distant places, all bearing the stamp
of the sending station, but none that of the receiving station, New York. They
were addressed to him at his New York office address, yet had come straight to
him at Philadelphia without passing through the New York office. And nobody in
New York knew his Philadelphia address. He took them himself from the postman's
hand; so they could not have been tampered with by his occult friend. But the
marvel did not end there. Upon opening them he found inside each something
written in the same handwriting as that in letters he had received in New York
from the Masters, the writing having been made either in the margins or on any
other space left blank by the writers.
"These were the precursors of a whole series of those phenomenal surprises
during the fortnight or so that I spent in Philadelphia. I had many, and no
letter of the lot bore the New York stamp, though all were addressed to me at
my office in that city."29
______________
29 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 36. In this work Col. Olcott undertakes
to classify the various types of phenomena produced by Madame Blavatsky.
73
The series of vivid phenomena which took place during the Philadelphia visit
may be listed briefly as follows:
1.--Col. Olcott purchased a note-book in which to record the rap messages. On
taking it out of the store wrapper he found inside the first cover: "John
King, Henry de Morgan, his book, 4th of the fourth month in A.D. 1875."
And underneath this was a whole pictorial design of Rosicrucian symbols, the
word Fate, the name Helen, the phrase "Way of Providence," a
monogram, a pair of compasses, and various letters and signs. No one had
touched it since its purchase at the stationary shop.
2.--Madame Blavatsky caused a photograph on the wall to disappear suddenly from
its frame and give place to a sketch portrait of "John King" while a
spectator was looking at it.
3.--Col. Olcott had bought a dozen unhemmed towels. As his companion was no
seamstress, he bantered her to let an elemental do the hemstitching on the lot.
She told him to put the towels, needle and thread inside a bookcase, which had
glass doors curtained with green silk. He did so. After twenty minutes she
announced that the job was finished. He found them actually, if crudely,
hemmed. It was four P.M., and no other persons were in the room.
4.-- Madame Blavatsky once suddenly disappeared from the Colonel's sight, could
not be seen for a period, and then as suddenly reappeared. She could not
explain to him how she did it.
5.--The increase overnight in the length of her hair, of about four to five
inches, and its later recession to its normal length.
6.--The projection of a drawing of a man's head on the ceiling above the
Colonel's head, where he had seen nothing a minute before.
7.--The precipitation by "John King," in answer to the Colonel's
challenge to duplicate a letter he had in his pocket, of the said duplicate,
correct in every word.
8.--The precipitation of a letter into the traveling bag of a Mr. B. while on
the train, the letter not having been packed there originally.
9.--The same Mr. B. begged Madame Blavatsky to create for him a portrait of his
deceased grandmother. She went to the window, put a blank piece of paper
against the pane, and handed it to him in a moment with the portrait of a
little old woman with many wrinkles and a large wart, which Mr. B. declared a
perfect likeness of his ancestor.
74
10.--The actual production by an Italian artist, through "his control of
the spirits of the air," during one evening of entirely clear sky, of a
small shower of rain, sufficient to wet the sidewalks. Previously Madame
Blavatsky had created a butterfly, following a similar production by the
Italian visitor.
11.--The materialization by Madame Blavatsky of a heavy gold ring in the heart
of a rose which had been "created" shortly before by Mrs. Thayer, a
medium whom Col. Olcott was testing with a view to sending her to Russia for
experimentation at a university there.
12.--The Colonel's own beard grew in one night from his chin down to his
chest.30
After the return from Philadelphia psychic events continued with great
frequency at the apartments in New York. In December of 1875, Madame Blavatsky,
having invited a challenge to reproduce the portrait of the Chevalier Louis,
reputed Adept author of Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten's Art Magic, rubbed
her hand over a sheet of paper and the desired photograph appeared on the under
side. She had laid the bare sheet on the surface of the table. Col. Olcott had
the opportunity nine years later of comparing this reproduction with the
original photograph of the Chevalier Louis, and found the likeness perfect, yet
the lines would not meet precisely when the one was superimposed on the other.
It could not have been a lithographic reproduction.
Early in 1878, Mr. O'Sullivan asked Madame Blavatsky for one of a chaplet of
large wooden beads which she was wearing. She placed one in a bowl and produced
the bowlful of them.
For the same gentleman in plain sight of several people, she triplicated a
beautiful handkerchief which he had admired.
To amuse the child of a caller, an English Spiritualist, one day she produced a
large toy sheep mounted on wheels. Col. Olcott claimed it had not been there a
moment before.
On Christmas eve of that year when she and the Colonel, went to his sister's
apartment, Madame expressed regret
______________
30 Ibid., Vol. I, Chapter III, pp. 40 ff.
75
that she had brought nothing for the youngsters. But saying, "Wait a
minute," she took her bunch of keys from her pocket, clutched three of
them together in one hand, and a moment later showed the party a large iron
whistle hanging on the ring instead of the three keys. Col. Olcott had to get
three new keys from a locksmith.
Another time to placate a little girl Madame promised her "a nice
present," and indicated to Col. Olcott that he should take it out of their
luggage bag in the hall. He unlocked the already stuffed bag and immediately on
top was a harmonica, or glass piano, about fifteen inches by four in size, with
its cork mallet beside it. Colonel had himself packed the bag, having to use
all his strength to close it, had reopened it on the train, and there was not a
moment when his friend could have slipped an object of such size into it.
It was in New York at this epoch that she took Col. Olcott's large signet ring,
rubbed it in her hands and presently handed him his original and another like
it except that the new one was mounted with a dark green bloodstone, whereas
the original was set with a red carnelian. That ring she wore till her death,
and it has since been the valued possession of Mrs. Annie Besant.
Once, in Boston, Madame walked through the streets in a pelting rain and
reached her lodgings without the trace of dampness or mud on her dress or
shoes. Similarly the Colonel found a handsome velvet-covered chair entirely
dry, not even damp, after being left out all night in a driving rain.
One time when the two were talking about three members of the Colonel's family,
a crash was heard in the next room. Rushing in he found that the photograph of
one of the three had been turned face inward, the large water-color picture of
another lay smashed on the floor, while the photograph of the third was
unmolested.
Madame once made instantly a copy of a scurrilous letter received by the
Colonel from a person who had done him an injustice. Again she duplicated a
five-page letter from the eminent Spiritualist, W. Stainton Moses. There was
not time for the receipt of the letter until its duplication for
76
any one to have copied it. The second sheets were copies, but not strictly
duplicate, as the lines would not match when the two were placed together and
held before the light.
At "The Lamasery" she produced an entire set of water colors, which
Mr. W. Q. Judge needed in making an Egyptian drawing. Next he needed some gold
paint, whereupon she took a brass key, scraped it over the bottom of an empty
saucer, and found the required paint instantly. The brass key was not consumed
in the process, but was needed, she explained, to help aggregate the atomic
material for the gold color.
When Olcott stated one evening that he would like to hear from one of the
Adepts (in India) upon a certain subject, Madame told him to write his
questions, seal them in an envelope, and place it where he could watch it. He
did so, putting it behind the clock on the mantel, with one end projecting in
plain view. The two went on talking for an hour, when she announced that the
answer had come. He drew out his own envelope, the seal unbroken, found inside
it his own letter, and inside that the Mahatma's answer in the script familiar
to him, written on a sheet of green paper, such as he had not had in the house.
Through her agency the portrait of the Rev. W. Stainton Moses was precipitated
on satin. It was a distinct likeness, and the head was rayed around with
spiculae of light. It was surrounded with rolling clouds of vapor, his astral
vehicle.
Olcott, Judge and a Dr. Marquette one evening asked her to produce the portrait
of a particular Hindu Yogi on some stationery of the Lotus Club that the
Colonel had brought home that same evening. She scraped some lead from a pencil
on a half sheet of the paper, laid the other half-sheet over it, placed them
between her hands, and showed the result. The likeness to the original could
not be verified, but it was pronounced by Le Clear, the noted portrait painter,
to be one "that no living artist within his knowledge could have
produced."
Once Col. Olcott desired a picture of his Guru, or Hindu teacher, as yet unseen
by him, and Madame essayed to have
77
it painted through the hand of a French artist, M. Herisse. The artist's only
instructions were that his subject was a Hindu. Madame concentrated, and he
painted. The features, finished in an hour, were afterwards vouched for by Col.
Olcott as being the likeness of his Guru, whom he met years later.
The Colonel testified to having seen Madame Blavatsky's astral form in a New
York street while she was in Philadelphia; also that of a friend of his then in
the South; again that of one of the Adepts, then in Asia, in an American
railway train and on a steamboat. He stated that he took from the hand of
another Mahatma at Jummu a telegram from H.P.B.31 who was in Madras, the
messenger vanishing a moment later; and that he, H.P.B. and Damodar, a young
Hindu devotee of hers, were greeted by one of these Teachers one evening in
India. But the occurrence of this kind which he regarded as the most striking,
affecting as it did his whole future career, happened at the close of one of
his busy days, when his evening's toil with the composition of Isis was
finished. He had retired to his own room and was reading, the room door locked.
Suddenly he perceived a white radiance at his side and turning saw towering
above him the great stature of an Oriental, clad in white garments and wearing
a head-cloth of amber-striped fabric, hand-embroidered in yellow floss silk.
"Long raven hair hung from under his turban to the shoulders; his black
beard, parted vertically on the chin in the Rajput fashion, was twisted up at
the ends and carried over the ears; his eyes were alive with soul-fire; eyes
which were at once benignant and piercing in glance; the eyes of a mentor and
judge, but softened by the love of a father who gazes on a son needing counsel
and guidance. He was so grand a man, so imbued with the majesty of moral
strength, so luminously spiritual, so evidently above average humanity, that I
felt abashed in his presence, and bowed my head and bent my knee as one does
before a god or a god-like personage. A hand was laid lightly on my head, a sweet
though strong voice bade me be
______________
31 Theosophists are so much in the habit of referring to their leader by her
three initials that we may be pardoned for falling into the same convenient
usage at times.
78
seated, and when I raised my eyes the Presence was seated in the other chair
beyond the table. He told me that he had come at the crisis when I needed him;
that my actions had brought me to this point; that it lay with me alone whether
he and I should meet often in this life as coworkers for the good of mankind;
that a great work was to be done for humanity and I had the right to share in
it if I wished; that a mysterious tie, not now to be explained to me, had drawn
my colleague and myself together; a tie which could not be broken, however
strained it might be at times."32
Then he arose and reading the Colonel's sudden but unexpressed wish that he
might leave behind him some token of his visit, he untwisted the fehta from his
head, laid it on the table, saluted benignantly and was gone.
Many a time, according to the Colonel's version, they were regaled with most
exquisite music, or single bell sounds, coming from anywhere in the room and
softly dying away.
Olcott tells of the deposit of one thousand dollars to his bank account by a person
described by the bank clerk as a Hindu, while he (Olcott) was absent from the
city for two months on business which he had undertaken at the behest of the
Master through H.P.B. He had told her that his errand would cost him about five
hundred dollars per month through his neglect of his business for the time.
In 1878 the Countess Paschkoff brought to light an adventure which she had had
years before while traveling with Madame Blavatsky in the Libanus. The two
women encountered each other in the desert and camped together one night near
the river Orontes. Nearby stood a great monument on the border of the village.
The Countess asked Madame to tell her the history of the monument. At night the
thaumaturgist built a fire, drew a circle about it and repeated several
"spells." Soon balls of white flame appeared on the monument, then
from a cloud of vapor emerged the spirit of the person to whom it had been
dedicated. "Who are you?" asked the woman. "I am Hiero, one of
the priests of the temple," said the voice of the spirit.
______________
22 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 380.
79
He then showed them the temple in the midst of a vast city. Then the image
vanished and the priest with it.
To round out the story of her phenomena it is necessary to relate with the
utmost brevity the incidents of the kind that transpired from the time of the
departure from America to India at the end of 1878 until the latter days of her
life. This narrative will include occurrences taking place in India, France,
Germany, and England.
It was in India that the so-called Mahatma Letters were precipitated, upon
which the basic structure of Theosophy is seen to rest. Mr. A. P. Sinnett,
British journalist, editor of "The Pioneer," living in India, is the
main authority for the events of the Indian period in Madame Blavatsky's life.
During the first visit of six weeks to Mr. Sinnett's home at Allahabad there
were comparatively few incidents, apart from raps. A convincing exploit of her
power was granted, however, for one evening while the party was sitting in the
large hall of the house of the Maharajah of Vizianagaram at Benares, three or
four large cut roses fell from the ceiling. The ceiling was bare and the room
well lighted.
About the beginning of September 1880 she visited the Sinnetts at their home in
Simla. Here some more striking incidents took place. During an evening walk
with Mrs. Sinnett to a neighboring hilltop, Madame, in response to a
suddenly-expressed wish of her companion, obtained for her a little note from
one of the "Brothers." Madame had torn off a blank corner of a sheet
of a letter received that day and held it in her hand for the Master's use. It
disappeared. Then Mrs. Sinnett was asked where she would like the paper to
reappear. She whimsically pointed up into a tree a little to one side.
Clambering up into the branches she found the same little corner of pink paper
sticking on a sharp twig, now containing a brief message and signed by some
Tibetan characters.
A little later the most spectacular of the marvels said to have been performed
by the "Messenger of the Great White Brotherhood" took place. A
picnic party to the woods some miles distant was planned one morning and six
persons
80
prepared to set off. Lunches were packed for six, but a seventh person unexpectedly
joined the group at the moment of departure. As the luncheon was unpacked for
the noontide meal, there was a shortage of a coffee cup and saucer. Some one
laughingly suggested that Madame should materialize an extra set. Madame
Blavatsky held a moment's mental communication with one of her distant Brothers
and then indicated a particular spot, covered with grass, weeds, and shrubbery.
A gentleman of the party, with a knife, undertook to dig at the spot. A little
persistence brought him shortly to the rim of a white object, which proved to
be a cup, and close to it was a saucer, both of the design matching the other
six brought along from the Sinnett cupboard. The plant roots around the China
pieces were manifestly undisturbed by recent digging such as would have been
necessary if they had been "planted" in anticipation of their being
needed. Moreover, when the party reached home and Mrs. Sinnett counted their
supply of cups and saucers of that design, the new ones were found to be
additional to their previous stock. And none of that design could have been
purchased in Simla.33
Before this same party had disbanded it was permitted to witness another feat
of equal strangeness. The gentleman who had dug up the buried pottery was so
impressed that he decided then and there to join the Theosophical Society. As
Col. Olcott, President of the Society, was in the party, all that was needed
was the usual parchment diploma. Madame Blavatsky agreed to ask the Master to
produce such a document for them. In a moment all were told to search in the
underbrush. It was soon found and used in the induction ceremony.
This eventful picnic brought forth still another wonder.
______________
33 Mr. Sinnett devotes some pages of his little volume, The Occult World,
to a critical examination of every conceivable possibility of this incident's
being other than it ostensibly was, and he is unable to find a loophole for the
admission of any theory of deception. All the witnesses to the event made
affidavit to the effect of its evident genuineness. The reader is referred to
his analysis of the case, to be found on pages 64-71 in the work just
mentioned. For close scrutiny of the other events of the same period the same
volume should be consulted.
81
Every one of the water bottles brought along had been emptied when the need for
more coffee arose. The water in a neighborhood stream was unfit. A servant,
sent across the fields to obtain some at a brewery, stupidly returned without
any. In the dilemma Madame Blavatsky took one of the empty bottles, placed it
in one of the baskets, and in a moment took it out filled with good water.
Some days later the famous "brooch" incident occurred. The Sinnett
party had gone up the hill to spend an evening with Mr. and Mrs. A. O. Hume,
who were likewise much interested in the Blavatskian theories. Eleven persons
were seated around the table and some one hinted at the possibility of a
psychic exploit. Madame appeared disinclined, but suddenly gave a sign that the
Master was himself present. Then she asked Mrs. Hume if there was anything in
particular that she wished to have. Mrs. Hume thought of an old brooch which
her mother had given her long ago and which had been lost. Neither she nor Mr.
Hume had thought of it for years. She described it, saying it contained a lock
of hair. The party was told to search for it in the garden at a certain spot;
and there it was found. Mrs. Hume testified that it was the lost brooch, or one
indistinguishable from it.
According to the statements of Alice Gordon, a visitor at the Sinnett home,
Madame Blavatsky rolled a cigarette, and projected it ethereally to the house
of a Mrs. O'Meara in another part of Simla, in advance of Miss Gordon's going
thither. To identify it she tore off a small corner of the wrapper jaggedly,
and gave it to Miss Gordon. The latter found it at the other home and the
corner piece matched.
Captain P. J. Maitland recites a "cigarette" incident which occurred
in Mr. Sinnett's drawing room. Madame took two cigarette papers, with a pencil
drew several parallel lines clear across the face of both, then tore off across
these lines a piece of the end of each paper and handed the short end pieces to
Captain Maitland; then she rolled cigarettes out of the two larger portions,
moistened them on her tongue, and caused them to disappear from her hands. The
Captain was told he would find one on the piano and the other on a
82
bracket. He found them there, still moist along the "seam," and
unrolling them found that the ragged edges of the torn sections and the pencil
lines exactly matched.
Some days later came the "pillow incident." Mr. Sinnett had the
impression that he had been in communication with the Master one night. During
the course of an outing to a nearby hill the following day, Madame Blavatsky turned
to him (he had not mentioned his experience to her) and asked him where he
would like some evidence of the Master's visit to him to appear. Thinking to
choose a most unlikely place, he thought of the inside of a cushion against
which one of the ladies was leaning. Then he changed to another. Cutting the
latter open, they found among the feathers, inside two cloth casings, a little
note in the now familiar Mahatma script, in the writing on which were the
phrases--"the difficulty you spoke of last night" and
"corresponding through--pillows!" While he was reading this his wife
discovered a brooch in the feathers. It was one which she had left at home.
Perhaps it was these cigarette feats which assured Madame Blavatsky that she
now had sufficient power to dispatch a long letter to her Mahatma mentors. Mr.
Sinnett first suggested the idea to her, and her success in that first attempt
was the beginning of one of the most eventful and unique correspondences in the
world's history. It began his exchange of letters with the Master Koot Hoomi
Lal Singh (abbreviated usually to K.H.), on which Theosophy so largely rests.
On several telegrams received by Mr. Sinnett were snatches of writing in K.H.'s
hand speaking of events that transpired after the telegram had been sent.
Replies were received a number of times in less time than it would have taken
Madame Blavatsky to write them (instantaneously in a few cases), yet they dealt
in specific detail with the material in his own missives. More than once his
unexpressed doubts and queries were treated. In many cases his own letter in a
sealed envelope would remain in sight and within a very short interval (thirty
seconds in one instance) be found to contain the distant Master's reply, folded
in-
83
side his own sheets, with an appropriate answer,--the seal not even having been
broken. Sometimes he would place his letter in plain view on the table, and
shortly it would be gone. For a time when the Master K.H. was called away to
other business, Mr. Sinnett continued to receive communications from the
brother Adept, Master Morya, while Madame Blavatsky was hundreds of miles away.
They continued in the distant absence of both H.P.B. and Col. Olcott. And not
only were such letters received by Mr. Sinnett, and Mr. Hume, but by other
persons as well. The list includes Damodar K. Mavalankar; Ramaswamy, an
educated English-speaking native of Southern India in Government service;
Dharbagiri Nath; Mohini Chatterji; and Bhavani Rao. Dr. Hübbe-Schleiden
received a missive of the kind later on a railway train in Germany. Mr. Sinnett
would frequently find the letters on the inside of his locked desk drawers or
would see them drop upon his desk. Their production was attended with all
manner of remarkable circumstances.
Then there was the notable episode of the transmission by the Master of a
mental message to a Mr. Eglinton, a Spiritualist, on board a vessel, the Vega,
far out at sea, and the instantaneous transmission of the letter's response,
written on board ship, to some of his friends in India, the whole thing done in
accordance with an arrangement made by letter to Mr. Sinnett by the Adept two
days before. This incident has a certain importance from the fact that the
Master had said in the preliminary letter that he would visit Mr. Eglinton on
the ship on a certain night, impress him with the untenability of the general
Spiritualistic hypothesis regarding communications, and if possible lead him to
a change of mind on the point. Mr. Eglinton's reply recorded the visit of the
Mahatma on the ship and admitted the desirability of a change to the Theosophic
theory of the existence of the Brothers.
An interesting chapter of events in the sojourn of the two Theosophic leaders
in India is that of the thousands of healings made by Col. Olcott, who states
that he was given
84
the power by the Overlords of his activities for a limited time with a special
object in view. He is said to have cured some eight thousand Hindus of various
ailments by a sort of "laying on of hands." Like Christ he felt
"virtue" go out of his body until exhaustion ensued; and he stated
that he was instructed to recharge his nervous depletion by sitting with his
back against the base of a pine tree.
In 1885 Madame Blavatsky herself experienced the healing touch of her Masters
when she was ordered to meet them in the flesh north of Darjeeling. Going north
on this errand, she was in the utmost despondency and near the point of death.
After two days spent with the Adepts she emerged with physical health and
morale restored, her dynamic self once more.
The last sheaf of "miracles" takes us from India to France, Germany,
Belgium, and England. In Paris, in 1884, her rooms were the resort of many
people who came if haply they might get sight of a marvel, her thaumaturgic
fame being now world-wide. A Prof. Thurmann reported that in his presence she
filled the air of the room with musical sounds, from a variety of instruments.
She demonstrated that darkness was not necessary for such manifestations.
Madame Jelihowsky is authority for the account of the appearance and
disappearance of her sister's picture in a medallion containing only the small
photograph of K.H.
A most baffling display of Madame's gifts took place in the reception room of
the Paris Theosophical Society on the morning of June 11th, 1884. Madame
Jelihowsky, Col. Olcott, W. Q. Judge, V. Solovyoff and two others were present
and attested the bona fide nature of the incident in a public letter. In
sight of all a servant took a letter from the postman and brought it directly
to Madame Jelihowsky. It was addressed to a lady, a relative of Madame
Blavatsky, who was then visiting her, and came from another relative in Russia.
Madame Blavatsky, seeing that it was a family letter, remarked that she would
like to know its contents. Her sister ventured the suggestion that she read it
before it was opened. Helena held the letter against her forehead and proceeded
to
85
read aloud and then write down what she said were the contents. Then, to
demonstrate her power further, she declared that she would underscore her own
name, wherever it occurred within the letter, in red crayon, and would
precipitate in red a double interlaced triangle, or "Solomon's Seal,"
beneath the signature. When the addressee opened the letter, not only was
H.P.B.'s version of its contents correct to the word, but the underscoring of
her name and the monogram in red were found, and oddly enough, the wavering in
several of the straight lines in the triangle, as drawn first by Madame
Blavatsky outside the letter, were precisely matched by the red triangle
inside. Postmarks indicated it had actually come from Russia.34
While at Elberfeld, Germany, with her hospitable benefactress, Madame Gebhard,
some of the usual manifestations were in evidence. Mr. Rudolph Gebhard, a son,
recounts several of them. One was the receipt of a letter from one of the
Masters, giving intelligence about an absent member of the household, found to
be correct.
The Countess Constance Wachtmeister, who became Madame Blavatsky's guardian angel,
domestically speaking, during the years of the composition of The Secret
Doctrine in Germany and Belgium, has printed her account of a number of
extraordinary occurrences of the period. She speaks of a succession of raps in
H.P.B.'s sleeping room when there was special need of her Guardians' care. She
also tells of the thrice-relighted lamp at the sleeper's bedside, she herself
having twice extinguished it. She tells of her receiving a letter from the
Master, inside the store-wrapper of a bar of soap which she had just purchased
at a drug store.
______________
34 Vlesevold Solovyoff, who afterwards sought to discredit Madame Blavatsky's
genuine status, himself witnessed this scene. In fact he wrote out his own
statement of the occurrence and sent it for publication to the St. Petersburg Rebus,
which printed it on July 1, 1884, over his signature. He closes that account
with the following paragraph: "The circumstances under which the
phenomenon occurred in its smallest details, carefully checked by myself, do
not leave in me the smallest doubt as to its genuineness and reality. Deception
or fraud in this particular case are really out of the question."
86
It was under the Countess Wachtmeister's notice that there occurred the last of
Madame Blavatsky's "miraculous" restorations to health. She had
suffered for years from a dropsical or renal affection, which in those latter
days had progressed to such an alarming stage that her highly competent
physicians at one crisis were convinced that she could not survive a certain
night. The great work she was writing was far from completed; the Countess was
heart-broken to think that, after all, that heroic career was to be cut off
just before the consummation of its labors for humanity; and she spent the
night in grief and despair. Arising in the morning she found Madame at her
desk, busy as before at her task. She had been revivified and restored during
the night, and would not say how.
The Countess records the occasion of an intercession of the Masters in her own
affairs, on behalf of their messenger. At her home in Sweden, while she was
packing her trunks in preparation for a journey to some relatives in Italy, she
clairaudiently heard a voice, which told her to place in her trunk a certain
note-book of her containing notes on the Bohemian Tarot and the Kabala. It was
not a printed volume but a collection of quotations from the above works in her
own hand. Surprised, and not knowing the possible significance of the order,
she nevertheless complied. Before reaching Italy she suddenly changed her
plans, and postponed the trip to Italy and visited Madame Blavatsky in Belgium
instead. Upon arriving and shortly after greeting her beloved friend, she was
startled to hear Madame say to her that her Master had informed her that her
guest was bringing her a book dealing with the Tarot and the Kabala, of which
she was to make use in the writing of The Secret Doctrine.
This must end, but does not by any means complete, the chronicle of "the
Blavatsky phenomena." The list, long as it has become, is but a fragment
of the whole. Without the narration of these phenomena an adequate impression
of the personality and the legend back of them could not be given. Moreover
they belong in any study of Theosophy, and their
87
significance in relation to the principles of the cult is perhaps far other
than casual or incidental. If her own display of such powers was made as a
demonstration of what man is destined to become capable of achieving in his
interior evolution, these things are to be regarded as an integral part of her
message. They became, apparently in spite of herself, a part of her program and
furnished a considerable impetus toward its advancement. Theosophy itself
re-publishes the theory of man's inherent theurgic capacity. It can hardly be
taken as an anomaly or as an irrelevant circumstance, then, that its founder
should have been regarded as exemplifying the possession of that capacity in
her own person.
88
CHAPTER IV
FROM SPIRITUALISM TO THEOSOPHY
Nothing seems more certain than that Madame Blavatsky had no definite idea of
what the finished product was to be when she gave the initial impulse to the
movement. She knew the general direction in which it would have to move and
also many objectives which it would have to seek. In her mind there had been
assembled a body of material of a unique sort. She had spent many years of her
novitiate in moving from continent to continent1 in search of data having to do
with a widespread tradition as to the existence of a hidden knowledge and
secret cultivation of man's higher psychic and spiritual capabilities.
Supposedly the wielder of unusual abilities in this line, she was driven by the
very character of her endowment to seek for the deeper science which pertained
to the evolution of such gifts, and at the same time a philosophy of life in
general which would explain their hidden significance. To establish, first, the
reality of such phenomena, and then to construct a system that would furnish
the possibility of understanding this mystifying segment of experience, was
unquestionably the main drive of her mental interests in early middle life.
Already well equipped to be the exponent of the higher psychological and
theurgic science, she aimed to become its philosophic expounder.
But the philosophy Madame Blavatsky was to give forth could not be oriented
with the science of the universe as then generally conceived. To make her
message intelligible she was forced to reconstruct the whole picture of the
cosmos. She had to frame a universe in which her doctrine
______________
1 It seems that she had been in Peru and Brazil in 1857, according to her later
statement to A. P. Sinnett as found on page 154 of the Letters of H. P.
Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett. A sentence in Vol. I, of Isis Unveiled
makes mention of her personal knowledge of great underground labyrinths in
Peru.
89
would be seen to have relevance and into whose total order it would fall with
perfect articulation. She felt sure that she had in her possession an array of
vital facts, but she could not at once discern the total implication of those
facts for the cosmos which explained them, and which in turn they tended to
explain. We may feel certain that her ideas grow more systematic from stage to
stage, whether indeed they were the product of her own unaided intellect, or
whether she but transcribed the knowledge and wisdom of more learned living
men, the Mahatmas, as the Theosophic legend has it.
Guided by the character of the situation in which she found herself, and also,
it seems, by the advice of her Master, she chose to ride into her new venture
upon the crest of the Spiritualist waves. America was chosen to be the hatching
center of Theosophy because it was at the time the heart and center of the
Spiritualist movement. It was felt that Theosophy would elicit a quick response
from persons already imbued with spiritistic ideas. It cannot be disputed that
Madame Blavatsky and Col. Olcott worked with the Spiritualists for a brief
period and launched the Society from within the ranks of the cult. As a matter
of fact it was the work of this pair of Theosophists that gave Spiritualism a
fresh impetus in this country after a period of waning interest about 1874.
Col. Olcott's letters in the Daily Graphic about the Eddy phenomena, and
his book, People From the Other World, did much to revive popular
discussion, and his colleague's show of new manifestations was giving
encouragement to Spiritualists. But the Russian noblewoman suddenly
disappointed the expectations thus engendered by assigning a different
interpretation and much lower value to the phenomena. Before this she and Col.
Olcott not only lent moral support to a leading Spiritualist journal, The
Spiritual Scientist, of Boston, edited by Mr. E. Gerry Brown, but
contributed its leading editorials and even advanced it funds.
The motive behind their participation in a movement which they so soon
abandoned has been misconstrued.
90
Spiritualists, and the public generally, assumed that of course their activity
indicated that they subscribed to the usual tenets of the sect; that they
accepted the phenomena for what they purported to be, i.e., actual
communications in all cases from the spirits of former human beings. However
true this estimate may have been as appertaining to Col. Olcott--and even to
him it had a fast diminishing applicability after his meeting with H.P.B.--it
was certainly not true of her. Madame Blavatsky shortly became the mark of
Spiritualistic attack for the falsification of her original attitude toward the
movement and her presumed betrayal of the cause.
Her ill-timed attempt to launch her Société Spirite at Cairo in 1871
foreshadowed her true spirit and motive in this activity. It is evident to the
student of her life that she felt a contempt for the banal type of séance
phenomena. She so expressed herself in writing from Cairo at the time. She felt
that while these things were real and largely genuine, they were insignificant
in the view that took in a larger field of psychic power. But the higher
phenomena of that more important science were known to few, whereas she was
constantly encountering interest in the other type. If she was to introduce a
nobler psychism to the world, she seemed driven to resort to the method of
picking up people who were absorbed in the lower modes of the spiritual science
and leading them on into the higher. She would gather a nucleus of the best
Spiritualists and go forward with them to the higher Spiritualism. To win their
confidence in herself, it was necessary for her to start at their level, to
make a gesture of friendliness toward their work and a show of interest in it.
Her own words may bring light to the situation:
"As it is I have only done my duty; first, toward Spiritualism, that I
have defended as well as I could from the attacks of imposture under the too
transparent mask of science; then towards two helpless slandered mediums [the
Holmeses]. . . . But I am obliged to confess that I really do not believe in
having done any good--to Spiritualism itself. . . . It is with a profound
sadness in
91
my heart that I acknowledge this fact, for I begin to think there is no help
for it. For over fifteen years have I fought my battle for the blessed truth;
have traveled and preached it--though I never was born for a lecturer--from the
snow-covered tops of the Caucasian Mountains, as well as from the sandy valleys
of the Nile. I have proved the truth of it practically and by persuasion. For
the sake of Spiritualism2 I have left my home, an easy life amongst a civilized
society, and have become a wanderer upon the face of the earth. I had already
seen my hopes realized, beyond my most sanguine expectations, when my unlucky
star brought me to America. Knowing this country to be the cradle of modern
Spiritualism, I came over here from France with feelings not unlike those of a
Mohammedan approaching the birthplace of his Prophet."3
After her death Col. Olcott found among her papers a memorandum in her hand
entitled "Important Note." In it she wrote:
"Yes, I am sorry to say that I had to identify myself, during that
shameful exposure of the Holmes mediums, with the Spiritualists. I had to save
the situation, for I was sent from Paris to America on purpose to prove the
phenomena and their reality, and show the fallacy of the spiritualistic theory
of spirits. But how could I do it best? I did not want people at large to know
that I could produce the same thing at will. I had received orders to
the contrary, and yet I had to keep alive the reality, the genuineness and the possibility
of such phenomena in the hearts of those who from Materialists had turned
Spiritualists, but now, owing to the exposure of several mediums, fell back
again and returned to their scepticism. . . . Did I do wrong? The world is not
prepared yet to understand the philosophy of Occult Science; let them first
assure themselves that there are beings in an invisible world, whether
'spirits' of the dead or elementals; and that there are hidden powers in man
which are capable of making a god of him on earth."
"When I am dead and gone people will, perhaps, appreciate my disinterested
motives. I have pledged my word to help people on to Truth while living and I
will keep my word. Let them abuse
______________
2 Not assuredly of the séance-room type. She is obviously using the term here
in the wider sense that it came to have in her larger Theosophic system, as
expounded in this chapter.
3 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 12.
92
and revile me; let some call me a medium and a Spiritualist, others an
impostor. The day will come when posterity will learn to know me better."4
As long as it was a question of the actuality of the phenomena, she was alert
in defence of Spiritualism. In the Daily Graphic of November. 13, 1874,
she printed one of her very first newspaper contributions in America, replying
to an attack of a Dr. George M. Beard, an electropathic physician of New York,
on the validity of the Eddy phenomena. She went so far in this article as to
wager five hundred dollars that he could not make good his boast that he could imitate
the form-apparitions "with three dollars' worth of drapery." She
refers to herself as a Spiritualist. In her first letter to Co. Olcott after
leaving Vermont she wrote as follows:
"I speak to you as a true friend to yourself and as a Spiritualist anxious
to save Spiritualism from a danger."5
A little later she even mentioned to her friend that the outburst of
mediumistic phenomena had been caused by the Brotherhood of Adepts as an
evolutionary agency. She could, of course, not believe the whole trend
maleficent if it was in the slightest degree engineered by her trusted
Confederates. She added later, however, that the Master soon realized the
impracticability of using the Spiritualistic movement as a channel for the
dissemination of the deeper occult science and instructed her to cease her
advocacy of it.
Along with her reply and challenge to Beard in the Graphic there was
printed an outline of her biography from notes furnished by herself. In it she
says:
"In 1858 I returned to Paris and made the acquaintance of Daniel Home, the
Spiritualist. . . . Home converted me to Spiritualism. . . . After this I went
to Russia. I converted my father to Spiritualism."
Elsewhere she speaks of Spiritualism as "our belief" and "our
cause." In an article in the Spiritual Scientist of March
______________
4 Ibid., p. 13.
5 Ibid., p. 68.
93
eighth she uses the phrases "the divine truth of our faith (Spiritualism)
and the teachings of our invisible guardians (the spirits of the
circles)."
Madame Blavatsky's apparently double-faced attitude toward Spiritualism is
reflected in the posture of most Theosophists toward the same subject today.
When Spiritualism, as a demonstration of the possibility and actuality of
spiritistic phenomena, is attacked by materialists or unbelievers, they at once
bristle in its defense; when it is a question of the reliability and value of
the messages, or the dignity and wholesomeness of the séance procedure, they
respond negatively.
It is the opinion of some Theosophic leaders, like Sinnett and Olcott, that
Madame Blavatsky made a mistake in affiliating herself actively with
Spiritualism, inasmuch as the early group of Spiritualistic members of her
Theosophic Society, as soon as they were apprised of her true attitude, fell
away, and the incipient movement was beset with much ill-feeling.
The controversy between the two schools is important, since Madame Blavatsky's
dissent from Spiritualistic theory gave rise to her first attempts to formulate
Theosophy. To justify her defection from the movement she was led to enunciate
at least some of the major postulates and principles of her higher science.
Theosophy was born in this labor. It is necessary, therefore, to go into the
issues involved in the perennial controversy.
To Spiritualists the phenomena which purported to be communications from the
still-living spirits of former human beings with those on the earth plane, were
assumed to be genuinely what they seemed. As such they were believed to be far
the most significant data in man's religious life, as furnishing a practically
irrefutable demonstration of the truth of the soul's immortality. They were
regarded as the central fact in any attempt to formulate an adequate religious
philosophy. Spiritualists therefore elevated this assumption to the place of
supreme importance and made everything else secondary.
Not so Madame Blavatsky. To her the Spiritistic phe-
94
nomena were but a meagre part of a larger whole. Furthermore--and this was her
chief point of divergence,--she vigorously protested their being what
Spiritualists asserted them to be. They were not at all genuine messages from
genuine spirits of earth people--or were not so in the vast majority of cases.
And besides, they were not any more "divine" or "spiritual"
than ordinary human utterances, and were even in large part impish and elfin,
when not downright demoniacal. They were mostly, she said, the mere
"shells" or wraiths of the dead, animated not by their former souls
but by sprightly roving nature-spirits or elementals, if nothing worse,--such,
for instance, as the lowest and most besotted type of human spirit that was
held close to earth by fiendish sensuality or hate. There were plenty of these,
she affirmed, in the lower astral plane watching for opportunities to vampirize
negative human beings. The souls of average well-meaning or of saintly people
are not within human reach in the séance. They have gone on into realms of
higher purity, more etherealized being, and can not easily descend into the heavy
atmosphere of the near-earth plane to give messages about that investment or
that journey westward or that health condition that needs attention. At best it
is only on rare and exceptional occasions that the real intelligence of a
disembodied mortal comes "through." There are many types of living
entities in various realms of nature, other than human souls. Certain of these
rove the astral plane and take pleasure in playing upon gullible people who sit
gravely in the dark. Most of the occurrences at circles are so much astral
plane rubbish; and, besides, séance-mongering is dangerous to all concerned and
eventually ruinous to the medium. If the mediums, she bantered, were really in
the hands of benevolent "guides" and "controls," why do not
the latter shield their protégés from the wrecked health and insanity so
frequent among them? She affirmed that she had never seen a medium who had not
developed scrofula or a phthisical affection.6
______________
6 Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten, herself a medium and among the foremost
Spiritualists of her day--also a charter member of the Theosophical
Society--made
95
Inevitably the Spiritualists were stunned by their one-time champion's sudden
and amazed reversal of her position. A campaign of abuse and condemnation began
in their ranks, echoes of which are still heard at times.
What Madame Blavatsky aimed to do was to teach that the phenomena of true
Spiritualism bore not the faintest resemblance to those of table-tipping. True
Spiritualism should envisage the phenomena of the divine spirit of man in their
higher manifestations, the cultivation of which by the ancients and the East
has given man his most sacred science and most vital knowledge. She wrote in a
letter to her sister about 1875 that one of the purposes of her new Society was
"to show certain fallacies of the Spiritualist. If we are anything we are
Spiritualists, only not in the modern American fashion, but in that of the
ancient Alexandria with its Theodidaktoi, Hypatias and Porphyries."7 In
one of the letters of Mahatma K.H. to A. P. Sinnett the Master writes:
"It was H.P.B. who, acting under the orders of Atrya (one whom you do not
know) was the first to explain in the 'Spiritualist' the difference between
psyche and nous, nefesh and ruach--Soul and Spirit. She had to bring the whole
arsenal of proofs with her quotations from Paul to Plato, from Plutarch and
James before the Spiritualists admitted that the Theosophists were
right."8
In 1879 she wrote in the magazine which she had just founded in India:
"We can never know how much of the mediumistic phenomena we must attribute
to the disembodied until it is settled how much can be done by the
embodied human soul, and to blind but active powers at work within those
regions which are yet unexplored by science."9
In other words Spiritualism should be a culture of the spirits of the living,
not a commerce with the souls of the dead. To
______________
a statement to the same effect to Col. Olcott in 1875. See Old Diary Leaves,
Vol. I, p. 83.
7 Quoted in William Kingsland's The Real H. P. Blavatsky (J. M. Watkins,
London, 1928), p. 123.
8 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett (New York, Frederick A. Stokes Co.,
1924), p. 289.
9 The Theosophist, Vol. I, 1879.
96
live the life of the immortal spirit while here in the body is true
Spiritualism. We can readily see that with such a purpose in mind she would not
be long in discerning that the Spiritualistic enterprise could not be used to
promulgate the type of spiritual philosophy that she had learned in the East.
When this conclusion had fully ripened in her mind, she began the undisguised
formulation of her own independent teaching. Her new philosophy was in effect
tantamount to an attack on Spiritualism, and that from a quarter from which
Spiritualism was not prepared to repulse an assault. It came not from the old
arch-enemy, materialistic scepticism, but from a source which admitted the
authenticity of the phenomena.
Her first aim was to set forth the misconceptions under which the Spiritualists
labored. She says:
"We believe that few of those physical phenomena which are genuine are
caused by disembodied human spirits."10
Again she
"ventures the prediction that unless Spiritualists set about the study of
ancient philosophy so as to learn to discriminate between spirits and to guard
themselves against the baser sort, twenty-five years will not elapse before
they will have to fly to the Romish communion to escape these 'guides' and
'controls' that they have fondled so long. The signs of this catastrophe
already exhibit themselves."11
Again she declares that
"it is not mediums, real, true and genuine mediums, that we would ever
blame, but their patrons, the Spiritualists."12
In Isis Unveiled she rebukes Spiritualists for claiming that the Bible
is full of phenomena just like those of modern mediums. She asserts that there
were Spiritualistic phenomena in the Bible, but not mediumistic,--a distinction
of great import to her. She declares that the ancients could
______________
10 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I, p. 13.
11 Ibid., p. 53.
12 Ibid., p. 489.
97
tell the difference between mediums who harbored good spirits and those haunted
by evil ones, and branded the latter type unclean, while reverencing the
former. She positively asserts that
"pure spirits will not and cannot show themselves objectively; those that
do are not pure spirits, but elementary and impure. Woe to the medium that
falls a prey to such!"13
Col. Olcott quotes her as writing:
"Spiritualism in the hands of an Adept becomes Magic, for he is learned in
the art of blending together the laws of the universe without breaking any of
them. . . . In the hands of an inexperienced medium Spiritualism becomes unconscious
sorcery, for . . . he opens, unknown to himself, a door of communication
between the two worlds through which emerges the blind forces of nature lurking
in the Astral Light, as well as good and bad spirits."14
In The Key to Theosophy15 written near the end of her life, she states
what may be assumed to be the official Theosophic attitude on the subject:
"We assert that the spirits of the dead cannot return to earth--save in
rare and exceptional cases--nor do they communicate with men except by entirely
subjective means. That which does appear objectively is often the phantom of
the ex-physical man. But in psychic and, so to say, 'spiritual' Spiritualism we
do believe most decidedly."16
One of her most vigorous expressions upon this issue occurs toward the end of Isis.
______________
13 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 586.
14 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 110.
15 Page 27.
16 That H. P. B. was by no means alone in predicating the existence of other
than human spirits denizening the astral world is shown by Col. Olcott, who (Old
Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 438), cites Mrs. Britten's statement printed in an
article in The Banner of Light, as follows: "I know of the
existence of other than human spirits and have seen apparitions of spiritual or
elementary existences evoked by cabalistic words and practices."
According to Olcott the Hon. A. Aksakoff, eminent Russian Professor, states
that "Prince A. Dolgorouki, the great authority on mesmerism, has written
me that he has ascertained that spirits which play the most prominent part at
séances are elementaries,--gnomes, etc. His clairvoyants have seen them and
describe them thus."
98
"The totally insufficient theory of the constant agency of disembodied
human spirits in the production of Spiritualistic phenomena has been the bane
of the Cause. A thousand mortifying rebuffs have failed to open their reason or
intuition to the truth. Ignoring the teachings of the past, they have
discovered no substitute. We offer them philosophical deduction instead of
unverifiable hypothesis, scientific analysis and demonstration instead of
indiscriminating faith. Occult philosophy gives them the means of meeting the
reasonable requirements of science, and frees them from the humiliating
necessity to accept the oracular teachings of 'intelligences' which, as a rule,
have less intelligence than a child at school. So based and so strengthened,
modern phenomena would be in a position to command the attention and enforce
the respect of those who carry with them public opinion. Without invoking such
help Spiritualism must continue to vegetate, equally repulsed--not without
cause--both by science and theologians. In its modern aspect it is neither
science, a religion nor a philosophy."17
In 1876, the writing of Isis was committing her to a stand which made
further compromise with Spiritualism impossible. Her statement reveals what she
would ostensibly have labored to do for that movement had it shown itself more
plastic in her hands. She would have striven to buttress the phenomena with a
more historical interpretation and a more respectable rationale.
In this context, however, the following passage from Isis is a bit
difficult to understand. It seems to make a gesture of conciliation toward the
Spiritualistic hypothesis after all. She says:
"We are far from believing that all the spirits that communicate at
circles are of the classes called 'Elemental' and 'Elementary.'
Many--especially among those who control the medium subjectively to speak,
write and otherwise act in various ways--are human disembodied spirits. Whether
the majority of such spirits are good or bad, largely depends on the private
morality of the medium, much on the circle present, and a good deal on the
intensity and object of their purpose. . . . But in any case, human spirits can
never materialize themselves in propria persona."18
______________
17 Isis Unveiled, Vol. II, p. 636. 18 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 67
99
If this seems a recession from her consistent position elsewhere assumed, it
must be remembered that she never, before or after, denied the possibility of
the occasional descent of genuinely human spirits "in rare and exceptional
cases."
Before 1875 she wrote to her sister that there was a law that sporadically,
though periodically, the souls of the dead invade the realms of the living in
an epidemic, and the intensity of the epidemic depends on the welcome they
receive. She called it "the law of forced post-mortem assimilation."
She elsewhere clarified this idea by the statement that our spirits here and
now, being of kindred nature with the totality of spirit energy about us,
unconsciously draw certain vibrations or currents from the life of the
supermundane entities, whether we know it or not. Through this wireless circuit
we sometimes drink in emanations, radiations, thought effluvia, so to speak,
from the disembodied lives. The veil, she affirmed, between the two worlds is
so thin that unsuspected messages are constantly passing across the divide,
which is not spatial but only a discrepancy in receiving sets. And both she and
the Master K.H. stated that during normal sleep we are en rapport with
our loved ones as much as our hearts could desire. The reason we do not
ordinarily know it is that the rate and wave length of that celestial
communication can not be registered on the clumsy apparatus of our brains. It
takes place through our astral or spiritual brains and can not arouse the
coarser physical brain to synchronous vibration.
Her critique of the Spiritualistic thesis in general would be that something
like ninety per cent of all ordinary "spirit" messages contain
nothing to which the quality of spirituality, as we understand that term in its
best significance, can in any measure be ascribed.
In rebuttal, Spiritualists point to many previsions, admonitory dreams,
verified prophecies and other messages of great beauty and lofty spirituality,
some of them leading to genuine reform of character, and they advance the
claim, that genuine transference of intelligence from the spirit realms to
earth is vastly more general than that fraction of
100
experience which could be subsumed under her "rare and exceptional cases
of "spirituality."
In one of the last works issued by Mr. Sinnett19 he deplores the unfortunate
clash that has come between the two cults, points out that it is foolish and
unfounded, and reminds both parties of the broad bases of agreement which are
found in the two systems. He feels that there can be no insurmountable points
of antagonism, inasmuch as Spiritualism, too, he asserts, is under the watch
and ward of a member of the Great White Brotherhood, the Master known as
Hilarion; and that it would be illogical to assume that members of that same
spiritual Fraternity could foster movements among mankind that work at cross
purposes with each other. But Mr. Sinnett does not give any authority for his
statement as to Hilarion's regency over Spiritualism, and many Theosophists are
inclined to doubt it. He feels that there is every good reason why Spiritualism
should go forward with Theosophy in such a unity of purpose as would render
their combined influence the most potent force in the world today against the
menace of materialism. Whenever Spiritualists display an interest in the
formulation of some scheme of life or cosmology in which their phenomena may
find a meaningful allocation, they can hardly go in any other direction than
straight into Theosophy. This is shown by their Articles of Faith, in which the
idea of Karma, the divine nature of man, his spiritual constitution and other
conceptions equally theosophic have found a place.
Perhaps Theosophists and Spiritualists alike may discern the bases of harmony between
their opposing faiths in a singular passage from The Mahatma Letters, an
utterance of the Master K.H.
"It is this [sweet blissful dream of devachanic Maya] during such a
condition of complete Maya that the Souls or actual Egos of pure loving sensitivities,
laboring under the same illusion, think their loved ones come down to them on
earth, while it is their own Spirits that are raised towards those in the
Devachan. Many of the subjective spiritual communications--most of them when
the
______________
19 Collected Fruits of Occult Teaching (London, T. F. Unwin, Ltd.,
1919).
101
sensitives are pure-minded--are real; but it is most difficult for the uninitiated
medium to fix in his mind the true and correct pictures of what he sees and
hears. Some of the phenomena called psychography (though more rarely) are also
real. The spirit of the sensitive getting idylized, so to say, by the aura of
the Spirit in the Devachan, becomes for a few minutes that departed
personality, and writes in the handwriting of the latter, in his language
and in his thoughts, as they were during his life-time. The two spirits become
blended in one; and, the preponderance of one over the other during such
phenomena determines the preponderance of personality in the characteristics exhibited
in such writings and 'trance-speaking.' What you call 'rapport' is in plain
fact an identity of molecular vibration between the astral part of the
incarnate medium and the astral part of the discarnate personality . . . there
is rapport between medium and 'control' when their astral molecules move in
accord. And the question whether the communication shall reflect more of the
one personal idiosyncrasy or the other, is determined by the relative intensity
of the two sets of vibrations in the compound wave of Akasha. The less
identical the vibratory impulses the more mediumistic and less spiritual will
be the message. So then measure your medium's moral state by that of the
alleged 'controlling' Intelligence, and your tests of genuineness leave nothing
to be desired."20
This plank in the Theosophic platform not having been laid down in 1875 to
bridge the chasm between the two movements, Madame Blavatsky drew away from her
Spiritualistic associates, and it became but a matter of time until some propitious
circumstance should give to her divergent tendency a body and a name.
The break with Spiritualism and the launching of the Theosophical Society were
practically contemporary. The actual formation of the new organization does not
on the surface appear to have been a deliberate act of Madame Blavatsky. While
it would never have been organized without her presence and her influence,
still she was not the prime mover in the steps which brought it into being. She
seems merely to have gone along while others led. However her Society grew out
of the stimulus that had gone forth from her.
______________
20 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 101.
102
It was Col. Henry Steele Olcott who assumed the rôle of outward leader in the
young movement. He gave over (eventually) a lucrative profession as a
corporation lawyer, an agricultural expert, and an official of the government,
to expend all his energies in this enterprise. He had acquired the title of
colonel during the Civil War in the Union army's manoeuvres in North Carolina.
At the close of the war he had been chosen by the government to conduct some
investigations into conditions relative to army contracts in the
Quartermaster's Department and had discharged his duties with great efficiency,
receiving the approbation of higher officials. He was regarded as an authority
on agriculture and lectured before representative bodies on that subject. He
had established a successful practice as a corporation counsel, numbering the
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company among his clients. In addition to these
activities he had done much reportorial work for the press, notably in
connection with his Spiritualistic researches. His authorship of several works
on the phenomena has already been mentioned. His career had achieved for him a
record of high intelligence, great ability, and a character of probity and
integrity.
It is the belief of Theosophists that he was expressly chosen by the Mahatmas
to share with Madame Blavatsky the honor and the labor of spreading her message
in the world. A passage from the Mahatma Letters puts this in clear
light. The Master K.H. there says:
"So, casting about, we found in America the man to stand as leader--a man
of great moral courage, unselfish, and having other good qualities. He was far
from being the best, but--he was the best one available. . . . We sent her to
America, brought them together--and the trial began. From the first both she
and he were given to understand that the issue lay entirely with
themselves."
In spite of difficulties, caused by the clash of temperaments and policies,
this odd, "divinely-constituted" partnership held firmly together
until the end. Their relationship was one of a loyal camaraderie, both being
actuated by an uncommon devotion to the same cause.
103
As early as May, 1875, the Colonel had suggested the formation of a
"Miracle Club," to continue spiritistic investigation. His proposal
was made in the interest of psychic research. It was not taken up. But Madame
Blavatsky's sprightly evening chatter and her reported magical feats continued
to draw groups of intelligent people to her rooms. Among those thus attracted
was Mr. George H. Felt, who had made some careful studies in phases of
Egyptology. He was asked to lecture on these subjects and on the 7th of
September, 1875, a score of people had gathered in H.P.B.'s parlors to hear his
address on "The Lost Canon of Proportion of the Egyptians." Dr. Seth
Pancoast, a most erudite Kabbalist was present, and after the lecture he led
the discussion to the subject of the occult powers of the ancient magicians.
Mr. Felt said he had proven those powers and had with them evoked elemental
creatures and "hundreds of shadowy forms." As the tense debate
proceeded, acting on an impulse, Col. Olcott wrote on a scrap of paper, which
he passed over to Madame Blavatsky through the hands of Mr. W. Q. Judge, the
following: "Would it not be a good thing to form a Society for this kind
of study?" She read it and indicated assent.
Col. Olcott arose and
"after briefly sketching the present condition of the Spiritualistic
movement; the attitude of its antagonists, the Materialists; the irrepressible
conflict between science and the religious sectaries; the philosophical
character of the ancient theosophies and their sufficiency to reconcile all
existing antagonisms; . . . he proposed to form a nucleus around which might
gather all the enlightened and brave souls who are willing to work together for
the collection and diffusion of knowledge. His plan was to organize a Society
of Occultists and begin at once to collect a library; and to diffuse
information concerning those secret laws of Nature which were so familiar to
the Chaldeans and Egyptians, but are totally unknown to our modern world of
science."21
______________
21 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 119. From notes taken at the meeting by
Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten, and published a day or two later in a New York
daily.
104
It was a plain proposal to organize for occult research, for the extension of
human knowledge of the esoteric sciences, and for a study of the psychic
possibilities in man's nature. No religious or ethical or even philosophical
interest can be detected in the first aims. The Brotherhood plank was a later
development, and the philosophy was an outgrowth of the necessity of
rationalizing the scientific data brought to light. The very nature of the
movement committed it, of course, to an anti-materialistic view. Col. Olcott
was still predominantly concerned to get demonstrative psychic displays. He was
made Chairman, and Mr. Judge, Secretary.
It is interesting to note the personnel of this first gathering of
Theosophists.
"The company included several persons of great learning and some of wide
personal influence. The Managing Editors of two religious papers; the co-editors
of two literary magazines; an Oxford LL.D.; a venerable Jewish scholar and
traveler of repute; an editorial writer of one of the New York morning dailies;
the President of the New York Society of Spiritualists; Mr. C. C. Massey an
English barrister at law; Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten and Dr. Britten; two New
York lawyers besides Col. Olcott; a partner in a Philadelphia publishing house;
a well-known physician; and . . . Madame Blavatsky herself."22
At a late hour the meeting adjourned until the following evening, when
organization could be more fully effected. Those who were present at the Sept.
8th meeting, and who thus became the actual formers (Col. Olcott insists
on the word instead of Founders, reserving that title to Madame Blavatsky and
himself) of the Theosophical Society, were: Col. Olcott, H. P. Blavatsky, Chas.
Sotheran, Dr. Chas. E. Simmons, H. D. Monachesi, C. C. Massey, of London, W. L.
Alden, G. H. Felt, D. E. deLara, Dr. W. Britten, Mrs. E. H. Britten, Henry J.
Newton, John Storer Cobb, J. Hyslop. W. Q. Judge, H. M. Stevens. A By-Law
Committee was named, other routine business attended to, a general discussion
held and adjournment taken to Sept. 13th. Mr.
______________
22 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 119.
105
Felt gave another lecture on Sept. 18th, after which several additional members
were nominated, the name, "The Theosophical Society," proposed, and a
committee on rooms chosen. Several October meetings were held in furtherance of
the Society; and on the 17th of November, 1875, the movement reached the final
stage of constitutional organization. Its President was Col. Henry Olcott;
Vice-Presidents, Dr. Seth Pancoast and G. H. Felt; Corresponding Secretary,
Madame H. P. Blavatsky; Recording Secretary, John S. Cobb; Treasurer, Henry J.
Newton; Librarian, Chas. Sotheran; Councillors, Rev. H. Wiggin, R. P.
Westbrook, LL. D., Mrs. E. H. Britten, C. E. Simmons, and Herbert D. Monachesi;
Counsel to the Society, W. Q. Judge. Mr. John W. Lovell, the New York
publisher, has the distinction of having paid the first five dollars
(initiation fee) into the treasury, and is at the present writing the only
surviving member of the founding group. At the November 17th meeting the
President delivered his inaugural address. It was an amplification of his
remarks made at the meeting of Sept. 7th, with some prognostications of what
the work of the Society was destined to mean in the changing conceptions of
modern thought.
The infant Society did not at once proceed to grow and expand. The chief reason
for this was that Mr. Felt, whose theories had been the immediate object of
strongest interest, and who was expected to be the leader and teacher in their
quest of the secrets of ancient magic, for some unaccountable reason failed
them utterly. His promised lectures were never scheduled, his demonstrations of
spirit-evocation never shown. This disappointment weighed heavily upon some of
the members. Mrs. Britten, Mr. Newton, and the other Spiritualists in the
group, finding that Madame Blavatsky was not disposed to investigate mediums in
the conventional fashion, or in any way to make the Society an adjunct of the
Spiritualistic movement, suffered another disappointment and became inactive or
openly withdrew. Mr. Judge and Col. Olcott were busy with their professional
labors, and
106
Madame Blavatsky had plunged into the writing of Isis Unveiled. The
Society fell into the state of "innocuous desuetude," and was
domiciled solely in the hearts of three persons, Olcott, Judge, and Madame
Blavatsky. However dead it might be to all outward appearance, it still lived
in the deep convictions of this trio. True, an occasional new recruit was
admitted, two names in particular being worthy of remark. On April 5th, 1878,
Col. Olcott received the signed application for membership from a young
inventor, one Thomas Alva Edison, and near the same time General Abner W.
Doubleday, veteran Major-General in the Union Army, united with the Society.
Edison had been attracted by the objects of the Society, largely because of
certain experiences he had had in connection with the genesis of some of his
ideas for inventions. They had seemed to come to him from an inner intelligence
independent of his voluntary thought control. Also he had experimented to
determine the possibility of moving physical objects by exertion of the will.
He was doubtless in close sympathy with the purposes of the Society, but the
main currents of his mechanical interests drew him away from active coöperation
with it. As for Major-General Doubleday, Theosophy gave articulate voice to
theories as to life, death, and human destiny which he had long cherished
without a formal label. He stated that it was the Theosophic idea of Karma
which had maintained his courage throughout the ordeals of the Civil War and he
testified that his understanding of this doctrine nerved him to pass with
entire fearlessness through those crises in which he was exposed to fire.23
When Theosophy was brought to his notice he cast in his lot with the movement
and was a devoted student and worker while he lived. When the two Founders left
America at the end of 1878 for India, Col. Olcott constituted General Doubleday
the President of the American body.24
______________
23 He was in active command of the Army of the Potomac at the Battle of
Gettysburg, following the death of General Reynolds on the 1st of July until
the arrival of General Meade.
24 He devised the modern game of baseball.
107
Concerning Mr. W. Q. Judge, there is only to be said that he was a young
barrister at the time, practicing in New York and making his home in Brooklyn,
where until about 1928 a brother, John Judge, survived him. He was a man of
upright character and had always manifested a quick interest in such matters as
Theosophy brought to his attention. It is reported among Theosophists that
Madame Blavatsky immediately saw in him a pupil upon whose entire sympathy with
her own deeper aims and understanding of her esoteric situation she could rely
implicitly. He is believed always to have stood closer to her in a spiritual
sense than Col. Olcott; in fact it is hinted that there was a secret
understanding between them as to the inner motivations behind the Society.
Later developments in the history of the movement seem to give weight to this
theory.
Mr. Judge and General Doubleday were the captains of the frail Theosophic craft
in America during something like four years, from 1878 to 1882, following the
sailing of the two Founders for India. If little activity was displayed by the
Society during this period, it was not in any measure the fault of those left
in charge. They were not lacking in zeal for the cause. It is to be attributed
chiefly to a state of suspended animation in which it was left by the departure
of the official heads. This condition itself was brought about by the long
protracted delay in carrying out a measure which in 1878 Col. Olcott had
designed to adopt for the future expansion of the Society. Madame Blavatsky's
work in Isis had disclosed the fact that there was an almost complete
sympathy of aims in certain respects between the new Society and the Masonic
Fraternity; that the latter had been the recipient and custodian down the ages
of much of the ancient esoteric tradition which it was the purpose of Theosophy
to revive. The idea of converting the Theosophical Society into a Masonic body
with ritual and degrees had been under contemplation for some time, and
overtures toward that end had been made to persons in the Masonic order. In
fact the plan had been so favorably regarded that on his departure Col. Olcott
left Mr. Judge and General
108
Doubleday under instructions to hold all other activities in abeyance until he
should prepare a form of ritual that would properly express the Society's
spiritual motif and aims. It happened, however, that on reaching India both his
and his colleague's time was so occupied with other work and other interests
that for three years they never could give attention to the matter of the
ritual. By that time they found the Society beginning to grow so rapidly
without the support they had intended for it in the union with an old and
respected secret order, that the project was abandoned. But it was this
tentative plan that was responsible for the apparent lifelessness of the
American organization during those years. A number of times the two American
leaders telegraphed Olcott in India to hasten the ritual and hinted that its
non-appearance forced them to keep the Society here embalmed in an aggravated
condition of status quo. When the scheme was definitely abandoned,
straightforward Theosophic propaganda was initiated and a period of healthy
expansion began.
It is of interest in this connection to note that on March 8, 1876, on Madame
Blavatsky's own motion, it was "resolved, that the Society adopt one or
more signs of recognition, to be used among the Fellows of the Society or for
admissions to the meetings." This might indicate her steady allegiance to
the principle of esotericism. The practice fell into disuse after a time. Yet
it was this idea of secrecy always lurking in the background of her mind that
eventually led to the formation of a graded hierarchy in the Theosophical
Society when the Esoteric School was formally organized.
Another development that Col. Olcott says "I should prefer to omit
altogether if I could" from the early history of the Society was the
affiliation of the organization with a movement then being inaugurated in India
toward the resuscitation of pure Vedic religion. This proceeded further than
the contemplated union with Masonry, and it led to the necessity of a more
succinct pronouncement of their creed by Col. Olcott and Madame Blavatsky.
Naturally Madame Blavatsky's accounts of the existence
109
of the great secret Brotherhood of Adepts in North India and her glorification
of "Aryavarta" as the home of the purest occult knowledge, had served
to engender a sort of nostalgia in the hearts of the two Founders for
"Mother India." It seemed quite plausible that, once the aims of the
Theosophical Society were broadcast in Hindustan, its friendly attitude toward
the ancient religions of that country would act as an open sesame to a quick
response on the part of thousands of native Hindus. It was not illogical to
believe that the young Theosophical Society would advance shortly to a position
of great influence among the Orientals, whose psychology, ideals, and religious
conceptions it had undertaken to exalt, particularly in the eyes of the Western
nations. India thus came to be looked upon as the land of promise, and the
"return home," as Madame Blavatsky termed it, became more and more a
consummation devoutly to be wished. With Isis completed and published
the call to India rang ever louder, and finally in November, 1878, came the
Master's orders to make ready. It was not until the 18th of December that the
ship bearing the two pilgrims passed out of the Narrows.
There had seemed to be no way opened for them to make an effective start in
India, no appropriate channel of introduction to their work there, until 1878.
Then Col. Olcott chanced to learn of a movement recently launched in India,
whose aims and ideals, he was given to believe, were identical with those of
his own Society. It was the Arya Samaj, founded by one Swami Dhyanand, who was
reputed to be a member of the same occult Brotherhood as that to which their
own Masters, K.H. and M., belonged. This latter allegation was enough to win
the immediate interest of the two devotees in its mission, and through
intermediaries Col. Olcott was put in touch with the Swami, to whom he made
overtures to join forces. The Arya Samaj was represented to the Colonel as
world-wide in its eclecticism, devoted to a revival of the ancient purity of
Vedantism and pledged to a conception of God as an eternal impersonal principle
which, under whatever name, all people alike worshipped. An
110
official linking of the two bodies was formally made in May, 1878, and the
title of the Theosophical Society was amended to "The Theosophical Society
of the Arya Samaj." But before long the Colonel received a translation of
the rules and doctrines of the Arya Samaj, which gave him a great shock. Swami
Dhyanand's views had either radically changed or had originally been
misrepresented. His cult was found to be drastically sectarian--merely a new
sect of Hinduism--and quite narrow in certain lines. Even then the Colonel
endeavored to bridge the gap, drawing up a new definition of the aims of his
Society in such an open fashion that the way was left clear for any
Theosophists to associate with the Samaj if they should so desire. It was not
until several years after the arrival in India that final disruption of all
connection between the two Societies was made, the Founders having received
what Col. Olcott calls "much evil treatment" from the learned Swami.
When the first discovery of the real character of the Arya Samaj was made in
1878, it was deemed necessary to issue a circular defining the Theosophical
Society in more explicit terms than had yet been done. Olcott does not quote
from this circular of his own, but gives the language of the circular issued by
the British Theosophical Society, then just organized, as embodying the
essentials of his own statement. This enables us to discern how far the
originally vague Theosophical ideals had come on their way to explicit
enunciation.
1. The British Theosophical Society is founded for the purpose of discovering
the nature and powers of the human soul and spirit by investigation and
experiment.
2. The object of the Society is to increase the amount of human health,
goodness, knowledge, wisdom, and happiness.
3. The Fellows pledge themselves to endeavor, to the best of their powers, to
live a life of temperance, purity, and brotherly love. They believe in a Great
First Intelligent Cause, and in the Divine Sonship of the spirit of man, and
hence in the immortality of that spirit, and in the universal brotherhood of
the human race.
4. The Society is in connection and sympathy with the Arya Samaj of Aryavarta,
one object of which Society is to elevate, by a
111
true spiritual education, mankind out of degenerate, idolatrous and impure
forms of worship wherever prevalent.25
In his own circular, Olcott, with the concurrence of H.P.B., made the first
official statement of the threefold hierarchical constitution of the
Theosophical Society. This grouping naturally arose out of the basic facts in
the situation itself. There were, first, at the summit of the movement, the
Brothers or Adepts; then there were persons, like H.P.B., Olcott himself and
Judge, with perhaps a few others, who were classified in the category of
"chelas" or accepted pupils of the Masters; then there were just
plain members of the Society, having no personal link as yet with the great
Teachers. A knowledge of this graduation is essential to an understanding of
much in the later history of the Society.
In the same circular the President said:
"The objects of the Society are various. It influences its Fellows to
acquire an intimate knowledge of natural law, especially its occult
manifestations."
Then follow some sentences penned by Madame Blavatsky:
"As the highest development, physically and spiritually, on earth of the
creative cause, man should aim to solve the mystery of his being. He is the
procreator of his species, physically, and having inherited the nature of the
unknown but palpable cause of his own creation, must possess in his inner
psychical self this creative power in lesser degree. He should, therefore,
study to develop his latent powers, and inform himself respecting the laws of
magnetism, electricity and all other forms of force, whether of the seen or
unseen universes."
The President proceeds:
"The Society teaches and expects its Fellows to personally exemplify the
highest morality and religious aspirations; to oppose the materialism of
science and every form of dogmatic theology . . .; to make known, among Western
nations, the long-suppressed facts about Oriental religious
philosophies, their ethics, chronology, esotericism, symbolism . . . ; to
disseminate a knowledge of the sublime teachings of the pure esoteric system of
the archaic period
______________
25 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 399.
112
which are mirrored in the oldest Vedas and in the philosophy of Gautauma
Buddha, Zoroaster, and Confucius; finally and chiefly, to aid in the
institution of a Brotherhood of Humanity, wherein all good and pure men of
every race shall recognize each other as the equal effects (upon this planet)
of one Uncreate, Universal, Infinite and Everlasting Cause."26
He sums up the central ideas as being:
1. The study of occult science.
2. The formation of a nucleus of universal brotherhood.
3. The revival of Oriental literature and philosophy.
And these three became later substantially the permanent platform of the
Society. In their final and present form they stand:
1. To form a nucleus of the Universal Brotherhood of Humanity without
distinction of race, creed, sex, caste, or color.
2. To encourage the study of Comparative Religion, Philosophy, and Science.
3. To investigate the unexplained laws of nature and the powers latent in man.
The inclusion of a moral program to accompany occult research and comparative
religion was seen to be necessary. Madame Blavatsky's disapprobation of
Spiritualism had as its prime motivation that movement's lack of any moral
bases for psychic progress. Therefore the ethical implications which she saw as
fundamental in any true occult system were embodied in the Theosophic platform
in the Universal Brotherhood plank. Brotherhood, a somewhat vague general term,
was made the only creedal or ethical requirement for fellowship in the Society.
At that it is, as a moral obligation, a matter of the individual's own
interpretation, and it is the Society's only link with the ethical side of
religion. Not even the member's clear violation of accepted or prevalent social
codes can disqualify him from good standing. The Society refuses to be a judge
of what constitutes morality or its breach, leaving that determination to the
member himself. At the same time through its literature it
______________
26 Ibid., Vol. I., p. 400.
113
declares that no progress into genuine spirituality is possible "without
clean hands and a pure heart." It adheres to the principle that morality
without freedom is not morality. Thus the movement which began with an impulse
to investigate the occult powers of ancient magicians, was moulded by
circumstances into a moral discipline, which placed little store in magic
feats.
114
CHAPTER V
ISIS UNVEILED
One morning in the summer of 1875 Madame Blavatsky showed her colleague some
sheets of manuscript which she had written. She explained: "I wrote this
last night 'by order,' but what the deuce it is to be I don't know. Perhaps it
is for a newspaper article, perhaps for a book, perhaps for nothing: anyhow I
did as I was ordered."
She put it away in a drawer and nothing more was said about it for some months.
In September of that year she went to Syracuse on a visit to Prof. and Mrs.
Hiram Corson, of Cornell University, and while there she began to expand the
few original pages. She wrote back to Olcott in New York that "she was
writing about things she had never studied and making quotations from books she
had never read in all her life; that, to test her accuracy Prof. Corson had
compared her quotations with classical works in the University Library and had
found her to be right."1
She had never undertaken any extensive literary production in her life and her
unfamiliarity with English at this time was a real handicap. When she returned
to the city Olcott took two suites of rooms at 433 West 34th Street, and there
she set to work to expound the rudiments of her great science. From 1875 to
1877 she worked with unremitting energy, sitting from morning until night at
her desk. In the evenings, after his day's professional labors, Olcott came to
her help, aiding her with the English and with the systematic arrangement of
the heterogeneous mass of material that poured forth. Later Dr. Alexander
Wilder, the Neo-Platonic scholar, helped her with the spelling of the hundreds
of classical philological terms she employed. But Madame Blavatsky wrote the
book, Isis Unveiled.
______________
1 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 203.
115
After the first flush of its popularity it has been forgotten, outside of
Theosophic circles. Even among Theosophists, or at any rate in the largest
organic group of the Theosophical Society, the book is hardly better known than
in the world at large. During the last twenty-five years there has been a
tendency in the Society to read expositions of Madame Blavatsky's ponderous volumes
rather than the original presentation; neophytes in the organization have been
urged to pass up these books as being too recondite and abstruse. It has even
been hinted that many things are better understood now than when the Founder
wrote, and that certain crudities of dogma and inadequacies of presentation can
be avoided by perusing the commentary literature. As a result of this policy
the percentage of Theosophic students who know exactly what Madame Blavatsky
wrote over fifty years ago is quite small. Thousands of members of the
Theosophical Society have grown old in the cult's activities and have never
read the volumes that launched the cult ideas.
Isis must not, however, be regarded as a text-book on Theosophy. The
Secret Doctrine, issued ten years later, has a better claim to that title. Isis
makes no formulation, certainly not a systematic one, of the creed of
occultism. It is far from being an elucidation or exegesis of the basic
principles of what is now known as Theosophy. Isis makes no attempt to
organize the whole field of human and divine knowledge, as does The Secret
Doctrine. It merely points to the evidence for the existence of that
knowledge, and only dimly suggests the outlines of the cosmic scheme in which
it must be made to fit. It is in a sense a panoramic survey of the world
literature out of which she essayed in part to draw the system of Theosophy. If
Theosophy is to be found in Isis, it is there in seminal form, not in
organic expression. Perhaps it were better to say that the book prepared the
soil for the planting of Madame Blavatsky's later teaching. Her impelling
thought was to reveal the traces, in ancient and medieval history and
literature, of a secret science whose principles had been lost to view. She
aimed to show
116
that the most vital science mankind had ever controlled had sunk further below
general recognition now than in any former times. She would relight the lamp of
that archaic wisdom, which would illuminate the darkness of modern scientific
pride.
Her work, then, was to make a restatement of the occult doctrine with its
ancient attestations. This was a gigantic task. It meant little short of a
thorough search in the entire field of ancient religion, philosophy, and
science, with an eye to the discernment of the mystery tradition, teachings,
and practices wherever manifested; and then the collation, correlation, and
systematic presentation of this multifarious material in something like a
structural unity. The many legends of mystic power, the hundreds of myths and
fables, were to be traced to ancient rites, whose far-off symbolism threw light
on their significance. It would be not merely an encyclopedia of the whole
mythical life of the race, but a digest and codification, so to speak, of the
entire mass into a system breathing intelligible meaning and common sense. Her
task, in a word, was to redeem the whole ancient world from the modern stigma
of superstition, crude ignorance, and childish imagination.
In view of the immensity of her undertaking we are forced to wonder whence came
the self-assurance that led her to believe she could successfully achieve it.
She was sadly deficient in formal education; her opportunities for scholarship
and research had been limited; her command of the English language was imperfect.
Yet her actual accomplishment pointed to her possession of capital and
resources the existence of which has furnished the ground for much of the
mystery now enshrouding her life. There seems to be an obvious discrepancy
between her qualifications and her product, to account for which diverse
theories have been adduced.
Just how, when and where Madame Blavatsky gained her acquaintance with
practically the entire field of ancient religions, philosophies, and science,
is a query which probably can never be satisfactorily answered. The history of
many
117
portions of her life before 1873 is unrecorded. We do not know when or where
she studied ancient literature. Books from which she quoted were not within her
reach when she wrote Isis. Can her knowledge be attributed to a
phenomenal memory? Olcott does say:
"She constantly drew upon a memory stored with a wealth of recollections
of personal perils and adventures and of knowledge of occult science, not
merely unparalleled, but not even approached by any other person who had ever
appeared in America, so far as I have heard."2
Throughout the two volumes of Isis there are frequent allusions to or
actual passages from ancient writings, a list of which includes the following:
The Codex Nazareus; the Zohar, the great Kabbalistic work of the Jews;
Chaldean3 Oracles; Chaldean Book of Numbers; Psellus' Works; Zoroastrian
Oracles; Magical and Philosophical Precepts of Zoroaster; Egyptian Book of the
Dead; Books of Hermes; Quiché Cosmogony; Book of Jasher; Kabala of the Tanaim;
Sepher Jezira; Book of Wisdom of Schlomah (Solomon); Secret Treatise on Mukta
and Badha; The Stangyour of the Tibetans; Desatir (pseudo-Persian4); Orphic
Hymns; Sepher Toldos Jeshu (Hebrew MSS. of great antiquity); Laws of Manu; Book
of Keys (Hermetic Work); Gospel of Nicodemus; The Shepherd of Hermas;
(Spurious) Gospel of the Infancy; Gospel of St. Thomas; Book of Enoch; The
History of Baarlam and Josaphat; Book of Evocations
______________
2 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 33.
3 The term Chaldean in these titles is thought by modern scholars to veil an
actual Greek origin of the texts in question. The existence of Chaldea and
Chaldeans appears to be regarded as highly uncertain. Of the Chaldeans Madame
Blavatsky says in The Theosophical Glossary: "Chaldeans, or Kasdim.
At first a tribe, then a caste of learned Kabbalists. They were the savants,
the magians of Babylonia, astrologers and diviners." Of the Chaldean
Book of Numbers she says: "A work which contains all that is found in
the Zohar of Simeon Ben-Jochai and much more. . . . It contains all the
fundamental principles taught in the Jewish Kabbalistic works, but none of
their blinds. It is very rare indeed, there being perhaps only two or three
copies extant and these in private hands."
4 Scholars have thrown doubt on the Persian authorship of this book. Madame
Blavatsky in the Glossary describes it as "a very ancient Persian
work called the Book of Shet. It speaks of the thirteen Zoroasters and
is very mystical."
118
(of the Pagodas); Golden Verses of Pythagoras; various Kabbalas; Tarot of the
Bohemians.
In the realm of more widely-known literature, she uses material from Plato and
to a minor extent, Aristotle; quotes the early Greek philosophers, Thales,
Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Democritus; is conversant with the
Neo-Platonist representatives, Ammonius Saccas, Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus
and Proclus; shows familiarity with Plutarch, Philo, Apollonius of Tyana, the
Gnostics, Basilides, Bardesanes, Marcion, and Valentinus. She had examined the
Church Fathers, from Augustine to Justin Martyr, and was especially familiar
with Irenaeus, Tertullian and Eusebius, whom she charged with having wrecked
the true ancient wisdom. Beside this array she draws on the enormous Vedic,
Brahmanic, Vedantic, and Buddhistic literatures; likewise the Chinese, Persian,
Babylonian, "Chaldean," Syrian, and Egyptian. Nor does she neglect
the ancient American contributions, such as the Popul Vuh. Her acquaintance
also with the vast literature of occult magic and philosophy of the Middle Ages
seems hardly less inclusive. She levies upon Averroës, Maimonides, Paracelsus,
Van Helmont, Robert Fludd, Eugenius Philalethes, Cornelius Agrippa von
Nettesheim, Roger Bacon, Bruno, Pletho, Mirandolo, Henry More and many a
lesser-known expounder of mysticism and magic art. She quotes incessantly from
scores of compendious modern works.
Because of this show of prodigious learning some students later alleged that Isis
was not the work of Madame Blavatsky, but of Dr. Alexander Wilder; others
declared that Col. Olcott had written it.5
______________
5 It is clear that Madame Blavatsky was not a literary person before the epoch
of the writing of Isis. She herself, in the last article for Lucifer that
she wrote before her death in 1891, entitled My Books, wrote:
1. When I came to America in 1873 I had not spoken English--which I had learned
in my childhood colloquially--for over thirty years. I could understand when I
read it, but could hardly speak the language.
2 I had never been at any college, and what I knew I had taught myself; I had
never pretended to any scholarship in the sense of modern research; I had then
hardly read any scientific European works, knew little of Western philosophy
and sciences. The little which I had studied and learned of these disgusted me
with its
119
There are three main sources of testimony bearing on the composition of the
books: (1) Statements of her immediate associates and co-workers in the
writing; (2) Her own version; (3) The evidence of critics who have traced the
sources of her materials.
First, there is the testimony of her colleague, Olcott, who for two years
collaborated almost daily with her in the work. He says:
"Whence, then, did H.P.B. draw the materials which comprise Isis and which
cannot be traced to accessible literary sources of quotation? From the Astral
Light, and by her soul-senses, from her Teachers--the 'Brothers,' 'Adepts,'
'Sages,' 'Masters,' as they have been variously called. How do I know it? By
working two years with her on Isis and many more years on other literary
work."6
He goes on:
"To watch her at work was a rare and never-to-be-forgotten experience. We
sat at opposite sides of one big table usually, and I could see her every
movement. Her pen would be flying over the page; when she would suddenly stop,
look out into space with the vacant eye of the clairvoyant seer, shorten her
vision as though to look at something held invisibly in the air before her, and
begin copying on the paper what she saw. The quotation finished, her eyes would
resume their natural expression, and she would go on writing until again
stopped by a similar interruption."7
Still more remarkable is the following:
"Most perfect of all were the manuscripts which were written for her while
she was sleeping. The beginning of the chapter on the civilization of
ancient Egypt (Vol. I., Chapter XIV) is an illustration. We had stopped work
the evening before at about 2 A.M. as usual,
______________
materialism, its limitations, narrow cut-and-dried spirit of dogmatism and air
of superiority over the philosophies and sciences of antiquity.
3. Until 1874 I had never written one word in English, nor had I published any
work in any language. Therefore:--
4. I had not the least idea of literary rules. The art of writing books, of
preparing them for print and publication, reading and correcting proofs, were
so many closed secrets to me.
5. When I started to write that which later developed into Isis Unveiled,
I had no more idea than the man in the moon what would come of it. I had no
plan; . . . I knew that I had to write it, that was all.--Old Diary Leaves,
Vol. I, p. 223.
6 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 208.
7 Ibid., p. 208.
120
both too tired to stop for our usual smoke and chat before parting; she almost
fell asleep in her chair, while I was bidding her goodnight; so I hurried off
to my bed room. The next morning, when I came down after my breakfast, she
showed me a pile of at least thirty or forty pages of beautifully written H.P.B.
manuscript, which, she said, she had had written for her by-------, a Master .
. . It was perfect in every respect and went to the printers without
revision."8
It is the theory of Olcott that the mind of H.P.B. was receptive to the
impressions of three or four intelligent entities--other persons living or
dead--who overshadowed her mentally, and wrote through her brain. These
personages seemed to cast their sentences upon an imperceptible screen in her
mind. They sometimes talked to Olcott as themselves, not as Madame Blavatsky.
Their intermittent tenancy of her mind he takes as accounting for the
higgledy-piggledy manner in which the book was constructed. Each had his
favorite themes and the Colonel learned what kind of material to expect when
one gave place to another. There was in particular, in addition to several of
the Oriental "Sages," a collaborator in the person of an old
Platonist--"the pure soul of one of the wisest philosophers of modern
times, one who was an ornament to our race, a glory to his country." He
was so engrossed in his favorite earthly pursuits of philosophy that he
projected his mind into the work of Madame Blavatsky and gave her abundant aid.
"He did not materialize and sit with us, nor obsess H.P.B. medium-fashion,
he would simply talk with her--psychically, by the hour together, dictating
copy, telling her what references to hunt up; answering my questions about
details, instructing me as to principles; and, in fact, playing the part of a
third person in our literary symposium. He gave me his portrait once--a rough
sketch in colored crayons on flimsy paper . . . from first to last his relation
to us both was that of a mild, kind, extremely learned teacher and elder
friend."9
______________
8 Ibid., p. 211. The Countess Wachtmeister testified to similar
productions of pages of manuscript in connection with the writing of The
Secret Doctrine ten years later.
9 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I. p. 239.
121
The medieval occultist Paracelsus manifested his presence for a brief time one
evening.10 At another time Madame produced two volumes necessary to verify
questions which Olcott doubted.
"I went and found the two volumes wanted, which, to my knowledge, had not
been in the house until that very moment. I compared the texts with H.P.B.'s
quotation, showed her that I was right in my suspicions as to the error, made
the proof correction, and then . . . returned the two volumes to the place on
the étagère from which I had taken them. I resumed my seat and work, and when,
after while, I looked again in that direction, the books had
disappeared."11
As Olcott states, when one or another of these unseen monitors was in evidence,
the work went on in fine fashion. But, he notes, when Madame was left entirely
to her own devices, she floundered in more or less helpless ineptitude. She
would write haltingly, scratch it over, make a fresh start, work herself into a
fret and get nowhere.
Olcott's testimony, as that of Dr. Wilder, Mr. Judge, Dr. Corson, the Countess
Wachtmeister, the two Keightleys, Mr. Fawcett and all the others who at one
time or another were in a position to observe Madame Blavatsky at work, must be
accepted as sincere. But if anybody could be supposed to know unmistakably
what was happening in her mind, that person would be the subject herself. What
has she to say? She states decisively that she was not the author, only the
writer of her books. In one of her home letters she says, speaking of Isis:
"since neither ideas nor teachings are mine."
In another letter to Madame Jelihowsky she writes:
"Well, Vera, whether you believe me or not, something miraculous is
happening to me. You cannot imagine in what a charmed world of pictures and
vision I live. I am writing Isis; not writing, rather copying out and drawing
that which She personally shows to me. Upon my word, sometimes it seems to me
that the ancient
______________
10 Ibid., p. 240.
11. Ibid., p. 210.
122
goddess of Beauty in person leads me through all the countries of past
centuries which I have to describe. I sit with my eyes open and to all
appearances see and hear everything real and actual around me, and yet at the
same time I see and hear that which I write. I feel short of breath; I am
afraid to make the slightest movement for fear the spell might be broken.
Slowly century after century, image after image, float out of the distance and
pass before me as if in a magic panorama; and meanwhile I put them together in
my mind, fitting in epochs and dates, and know for sure that there can be no
mistake. Races and nations, countries and cities, which have long disappeared
in the darkness of the prehistoric past, emerge and then vanish, giving place
to others; and then I am told the consecutive dates. Hoary antiquity makes way
for historical periods; myths are explained to me with events and people who
have really existed, and every event which is at all remarkable, every
newly-turned page of this many-colored book of life, impresses itself on my
brain with photographic exactitude. My own reckonings and calculations appear
to me later on as separate colored pieces of different shapes in the game which
is called casse-tête (puzzles). I gather them together and try to match them
one after the other, and at the end there always comes out a geometrical whole.
. . . Most assuredly it is not I who do it all, but my Ego, the highest
principle that lives in me. And even this with the help of my Guru and teacher
who helps me in everything. If I happen to forget something I have just to
address him, and another of the same kind in my thought as what I have
forgotten rises once more before my eyes--sometimes whole tables of numbers
passing before me, long inventories of events. They remember everything. They
know everything. Without them, from whence could I gather my knowledge? I
certainly refuse point blank to attribute it to my own knowledge or memory, for
I could never arrive alone at either such premises or conclusions. I tell you
seriously I am helped. And he who helps me is my Guru."12
In another letter to the same sister Helena assures her relative about her
mental condition:
"Do not be afraid that I am off my head; all I can say is that someone
positively inspires me. . . . More than this; someone enters me. It is not I
who talk and write; it is something within me;
______________
12 Published in The Path, Vol. IX, p. 300.
123
my higher and luminous Self; that thinks and writes for me. Do not ask me, my
friend, what I experience, because I could not explain it to you clearly. I do
not know myself! The one thing I know is that now, when I am about to reach old
age, I have become a sort of storehouse of somebody else's knowledge. . . .
Someone comes and envelops me as a misty cloud and all at once pushes me out of
myself, and then I am not 'I' any more--Helena P. Blavatsky--but somebody else.
Someone strong and powerful, born in a totally different region of the world;
and as to myself it is almost as if I were asleep, or lying by not quite
conscious--not in my own body, but close by, held only by a thread which
ties me to it. However at times I see and hear everything quite clearly; I am
perfectly conscious of what my body is saying and doing--or at least its new
possessor. I can understand and remember it all so well that afterwards I can
repeat it, and even write down his words. . . . At such a time I see awe and
fear on the faces of Olcott and others, and follow with interest the way in
which he half-pityingly regards them out of my own eyes, and teaches them with
my physical tongue. Yet not with my mind, but his own, which enwraps my brain
like a cloud. . . . Ah, but I really cannot explain everything!"13
Again writing to her relatives, she states:
"When I wrote Isis I wrote it so easily that it was certainly no labor but
a real pleasure. Why should I be praised for it? Whenever I am told to
write I sit down and obey, and then I can write easily upon almost
anything--metaphysics, psychology, philosophy, ancient religions, zoölogy,
natural sciences or what not. I never put myself the question: 'Can I write on
this subject?' . . .or, 'Am I equal to the task?' but I simply sit down and write.
Why? Because someone who knows all dictates to me. My Master and
occasionally others whom I knew on my travels years ago. . . . I tell you
candidly, that whenever I write upon a subject I know little or nothing of, I
address myself to them, and one of them inspires me, i.e., he
allows me to simply copy what I write from manuscripts, and even printed
matter, that pass before my eyes, in the air, during which process I have never
been unconscious one single instant."14
To her aunt she wrote:
______________
13 The Path, Vol. IX, p. 266
14 Letter quoted in Mr. Sinnett's Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky,
p. 205.
124
"At such times it is no more I who write, but my inner Ego, my 'luminous
Self,' who thinks and writes for me. Only see . . . you who know me. When was I
ever so learned as to write such things? Whence was all this knowledge?"
Whatever the actual authorship of the two volumes may have been, their
publication stirred such wide-spread interest that the first editions were
swept up at once, and Bouton, the publisher, was taken off guard, there being
some delay before succeeding editions of the bulky tomes could be issued.
Professional reviewers were not so generous; but the press critics were frankly
intrigued into something like praise.15
Years after the publication of Isis, Mr. Emmette Coleman, a former
Theosophist and contributor to current magazines, stated that he spent three
years upon a critical and exhaustive examination of the sources used by Madame
______________
15 It is of some interest to see how it was received in 1877. The Boston Transcript
says: "It must be acknowledged that she is a remarkable woman, who has
read more, seen more and thought more than most wise men. Her work abounds in
quotations from a dozen different languages, not for the purpose of vain
display of erudition, but to substantiate her peculiar views. Her pages are
garnished with footnotes, establishing as her authorities some of the
profoundest writers of the past. To a large class of readers this remarkable
work will prove of absorbing interest . . . it demands the earnest attention of
thinkers and merits an analytic reading."
From the New York Independent came the following: "The appearance
of erudition is stupendous. References to and quotations from the most unknown
and obscure writers in all languages abound; interspersed with allusions to
writers of the highest repute, which have evidently been more than skimmed
through."
This from the New York World: "An extremely readable and exhaustive
essay upon the paramount importance of reëstablishing the Hermetic philosophy
in a world which blindly believes that it has outgrown it."
Olcott's own paper, The New York Daily Graphic, said: "A marvelous
book, both in matter and manner of treatment. Some idea may be formed of the
rarity and extent of its contents when the index alone comprises 50 pages, and
we venture nothing in saying that such an index of subjects was never before
compiled by any human being."
The New York Tribune confined itself to saying: "The present work
is the fruit of her remarkable course of education and amply confirms her
claims to the character of an adept in secret science, and even to the rank of
an hierophant in the exposition of its mystic lore."
And the New York Herald: "It is easy to forecast the reception of
this book. With its striking peculiarities, its audacity, its versatility and
the prodigious variety of subjects which it notices and handles, it is one of
the remarkable productions of the century."
125
Blavatsky in her various works. He attempted to discredit the whole Theosophic
movement by casting doubt upon the genuineness of her knowledge. He accused her
of outright plagiarism and went to great pains to collect and present his
evidence. In 1893 he published his data. We quote the following passage from
his statement:
"In Isis Unveiled, published in 1877, I discovered some 2,000
passages copied from other books without proper credit. By careful analysis I
found that in compiling Isis about 100 books were used. About 1,400
books are quoted from and referred to in this work; but, from the 100 books
which its author possessed, she copied everything in Isis taken from and
relating to the other 1,300. There are in Isis about 2,100 quotations
from and references to books that were copied, at second-hand, from books other
than the originals; and of this number only about 140 are credited to the books
from which Madame Blavatsky copied them at second-hand. The others are quoted in
such a manner as to lead the reader to think that Madame Blavatsky had read and
utilized the original works, and had quoted from them at first-hand,--the truth
being that these originals had evidently never been read by Madame Blavatsky.
By this means many readers of Isis . . . have been misled into thinking
Madame Blavatsky an enormous reader, possessed of vast erudition; while the
fact is her reading was very limited, and her ignorance was profound in all
branches of knowledge."16
Coleman went on to assert that "not a line of the quotations" made by
H.P.B. ostensibly from the Kabala, from the old-time mystics at the time of
Paracelsus, from the classical authors, Homer, Livy, Ovid, Virgil, Pliny, and
others, from the Church Fathers, from the Neo-Platonists, was taken from the
originals, but all from second-hand usage. He charged her with having picked
all these passages out of modern books scattered throughout which she found the
material from a wide range of ancient authorship. The reader of Isis will
readily find her many references to modern authors. Coleman mentioned a half
dozen standard works that she used; it is well worth while glancing at a fuller
list. She had read, or was more or less familiar with: King's
______________
16 Appendix to V. S. Solovyoff's A Modern Priestess of Isis (London,
1895), p. 354.
126
Gnostics; Jennings' Rosicrucians; Dunlop's Sod, and Spirit
History of Man; Moor's Hindu Pantheon; Ennemoser's History of
Magic; Howitt's History of the Supernatural; Salverte's Philosophy
of Magic; Barrett's Magus; Col. H. Yule's The Book of Ser Marco
Polo; Inman's Pagan and Modern Christian Symbolism and Ancient
Faiths and Modern; the anonymous The Unseen Universe and Supernatural
Religion; Bunsen's Egypt's Place in Universal History; Lundy's Monumental
Christianity; Horst's Zauber-Bibliothek; Cardinal Wiseman's Lectures
on Science and Religion; Draper's The Conflict of Science with Religion;
Dupuis' Origin of All the Cults; Bailly's Ancient and Modern
Astronomy; Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire; Des
Mousseaux's Roman Catholic writings on Magic, Mesmerism, Spiritualism; Eliphas
Levi's works; Jacolliot's twenty-seven volumes on Oriental systems; Max
Müller's, Huxley's, Tyndall's, and Spencer's works.
It is hardly to be doubted that Madame Blavatsky culled many of her ancient
gems from these works, and she probably felt that it was a matter of minor
importance how she came by them. What she was bent on saying was that the
ancients had said these things and that they were confirmatory of her general
theses. Yet Coleman's findings must not be disregarded. His work brought into
clearer light the meagreness of her resources and her lack of scholarly
preparation for so pretentious a study.
We have adduced the several hypotheses that have been advanced to account for
the writing of Isis Unveiled. It must be left for the reader to arrive
at what conclusion he can on the basis of the material presented. We pass on to
an examination of the contents.
A hint as to the aim of the work, is given in the sub-title: A Master-key to
the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology. She says:
"The work now submitted to the public judgment is the fruit of a somewhat
intimate acquaintance with Eastern Adepts and study of their science. It is a
work on magico-spiritual philosophy and occult science. It is an attempt to aid
the student to detect the
127
vital principles which underlie the philosophical systems of old."17
She affirms it to be her aim
"to show that the pretended authorities of the West must go to the
Brahmans and Lamaists of the far Orient and respectfully ask them to impart the
alphabet of true science."18
Isis, then, is a glorification of the ancient Orientals. Their knowledge
was so profound that we are incredulous when told about it. If we have
"harnessed the forces of Nature to do our work," they had subjugated
the world to their will. They knew things we have not yet dreamed of. She
states:
"It is rather a brief summary of the religions, philosophies and universal
traditions in the spirit of those secret doctrines of which none,--thanks to
prejudice and bigotry--have reached Christendom in so unmutilated a form as to
secure it a fair judgment. Since the days of the unlucky Mediaeval
philosophers, the last to write upon these secret doctrines of which they were
the depositaries, few men have dared to brave persecution and prejudice by
placing their knowledge on record. And these few have never, as a rule, written
for the public, but only for those of their own and succeeding times who
possessed the key to their jargon. The multitude, not understanding them or
their doctrines, have been accustomed to regard them en masse as either
charlatans or dreamers. Hence the unmerited contempt into which the study of
the noblest of sciences--that of the spiritual man--has gradually
fallen."19
She plans to restore this lost and fairest of the sciences. Materialism is
menacing man's higher spiritual unfoldment.
"To prevent the crushing of these spiritual aspirations, the blighting of
these hopes, and the deadening of that intuition which teaches us of a God and
a hereafter, we must show our false theologies in their naked deformity and
distinguish between divine religion and human dogmas. Our voice is raised for
spiritual freedom and our plea made for the enfranchisement from all tyranny,
whether of Science or Theology."20
______________
17 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I, p. 165.
18 Ibid., Vol. I, p. xiv.
19 Ibid., Vol. I, p. xlii.
20 Ibid., Vol. I, p. xiv.
128
She here sets forth her attitude toward orthodox religionism as well as toward
materialistic science. She intimates that since the days of the true esoteric
wisdom, mankind has been thrown back and forth between the systems of an
unenlightening theology and an equally erroneous science, both stultifying in
their influence on spiritual aspiration, both blighting the delicate culture of
beauty and joyousness.
"It was while most anxious to solve these perplexing problems [Who, where,
what is God? What is the spirit in man?] that we came into contact with certain
men, endowed with such mysterious powers and such profound knowledge that we
may truly designate them as the Sages of the Orient. To their instruction we
lent a ready ear. They showed us that by combining science with religion, the
existence of God and the immortality of man's spirit may be demonstrated like a
problem of Euclid."
She adds:
"Such knowledge is priceless; and it has been hidden only from those who
overlooked it, derided it or denied its existence."21
The soul within escapes their view, and the Divine Mother has no message for
them. To become conversant with the powers of the soul we must develop the
higher faculties of intuition and spiritual vision.22
______________
21 Ibid., Vol. I, Preface, p. 1.
22 Perhaps the following excerpt states the intent of Isis more
specifically:
"What we desire to prove is that underlying every ancient popular religion
was the same ancient wisdom-doctrine, one and identical, professed and
practiced by the initiates of every country, who alone were aware of its
existence and importance. To ascertain its origin and precise age in which it
was matured, is now beyond human possibility. A single glance, however, is
enough to assure one that it could not have attained the marvelous perfection
in which we find it pictured to us in the relics of the various esoteric
systems, except after a succession of ages. A philosophy so profound, a moral
code so ennobling, and practical results so conclusive and so uniformly
demonstrable, is not the growth of a generation. . . . Myriads of the brightest
human intellects must have reflected upon the laws of nature before this
ancient doctrine had taken concrete shape. The proofs of this identity of
fundamental doctrine in the old religions are found in the prevalence of a
system of initiation; in the secret sacerdotal castes, who had the guardianship
of mystical words of power, and a public display of a phenomenal control over
natural forces, indicating association with preter-human beings. Every approach
to the Mysteries of all these nations was guarded with the same jealous care,
and in all, the penalty of death was inflicted upon initiates of any degree who
divulged secrets entrusted to them."
129
She says that there were colleges in the days of old for the teaching of
prophecy and occultism in general. Samuel and Elisha were heads of such
academies, she affirms. The study of magic or wisdom included every branch of
science, the metaphysical as well as the physical, psychology and physiology,
in their common and occult phases; and the study of alchemy was universal, for
it was both a physical and a spiritual science. The ancients studied nature
under its double aspect and the claim is that they discovered secrets which the
modern physicist, who studies but the dead forms of things, can not unlock.
There are regions of nature which will never yield their mysteries to the
scientist armed only with mechanical apparatus. The ancients studied the outer
forms of nature, but in relation to the inner life. Hence they saw more than we
and were better able to read meaning in what they saw. They regarded everything
in nature as the materialization of spirit. Thus they were able to find an
adequate ground for the harmonization of science and religion. They saw spirit
begetting force, and force matter; spirit and matter were but the two aspects
of the one essence. Matter is nothing other than the crystallization of spirit
on the outer periphery of its emanative range. The ancients worshipped, not
nature, but the power behind nature.
Madame Blavatsky contrasts this fulness of the ancient wisdom with the
barrenness of modern knowledge. She characterizes the eighteenth century as a
"barren period," during which "the malignant fever of
scepticism" has spread through the thought of the age and transmitted
"unbelief as an hereditary disease on the nineteenth." She challenges
science to explain some of the commonest phenomena of nature; why, for
instance, the moon affects insane people, why the crises of certain diseases correspond
to lunar changes, why certain flowers alternately open and close their petals
as clouds flit across the face of the moon. She says that science has not yet
learned to look outside this ball of dirt for hidden influences which are
affecting us day by day. The ancients, she declares, postulated reciprocal
relations between the planetary bodies as perfect as those
130
between the organs of the body and the corpuscles of the blood. There is not a
plant or mineral which has disclosed the last of its properties to the
scientist. She declares that theurgical magic is the last expression of occult
psychological science; and denies the "Academicians" "the right
of expressing their opinion on a subject which they have never investigated."
"Their incompetence to determine the value of magic and Spiritualism is as
demonstrable as that of the Fiji Islander to evaluate the labors of Faraday or
Agassiz." There was no missing link in the ancient knowledge, no hiatus to
be filled "with volumes of materialistic speculation made necessary by the
absurd attempt to solve an equation with but one set of quantities." She
runs on:
"Our 'ignorant' ancestors traced the law of evolution throughout the whole
universe. As by gradual progression from the star-cloudlet to the development
of the physical body of man, the rule holds good, so from the universal ether
to the incarnate human spirit, they traced one uninterrupted series of
entities. These evolutions were from the world of spirit into the world of
gross matter; and through that back again to the source of all things. The
'descent of species' was to them a descent from the spirit, primal source of
all, to the 'degradation of matter.' In this complete chain of unfoldings the
elementary, spiritual beings had as distinct a place, midway between the
extremes, as Darwin's missing link between the ape and man."23
Modern knowledge posits only evolution; the old science held that evolution was
neither conceivable nor understandable without a previous involution.
The existence of myriads of orders of beings not human in a realm of nature to
which our senses do not normally give us access, and of which science knows
nothing at all, is posited in her arcane systems. She catches at Milton's lines
to bolster this theory:
"Millions of spiritual creatures walk this earth,
Unseen both when we sleep and when we wake."
She says that if the spiritual faculties of the soul are sharpened by intense
enthusiasm and purified from earthly
______________
23 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I, p. 281.
131
desire, man may learn to see some of these denizens of the illimitable air.
The physical world was fashioned on the model of divine ideas, which, like the
unseen lines of force radiated by the magnet, to throw the iron-filings into
determinate shape, give form and nature to the physical manifestation. If man's
essential nature partakes of this universal life, then it, too, must partake of
all the attributes of the demiurgic power. As the Creator, breaking up the
chaotic mass of dead inactive matter, shaped it into form, so man, if he knew
his powers, could to a degree do the same.
To redeem the ancient world from modern scorn Madame Blavatsky had to vindicate
magic--with all its incubus of disrepute and ridicule--and lift its
practitioners to a lofty place in the ranks of true science. She had to
demonstrate that genuine magic was a veritable fact, an undeniable part of the
history of man; and not only true, but the highest evidence of man's kinship
with nature, the topmost manifestation of his power, the royal science among
all sciences! To her view the dearth of magic in modern philosophies was at
once the cause and the effect of their barrenness. If they are to be vitalized
again, magic must be revived. "That magic is indeed possible is the moral
of this book."24
And along with magic she had to champion its aboriginal bed-fellows, astrology,
alchemy, healing, mesmerism, trance subjection, and the whole brood of
"pseudo-science."
"It is an insult to human nature to brand magic and the occult sciences
with the name of imposture. To believe that for so many thousands of years one
half of mankind practiced deception and fraud on the other half is equivalent
to saying that the human race is composed only of knaves and incurable idiots.
Where is the country in which magic was not practiced? At what age was it
wholly forgotten?"25
She explains magic as based on a reciprocal sympathy between celestial and
terrestrial natures. It is based on the mysterious affinities existing between
organic and inorganic
_______________
24 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 36.
25 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 14.
132
bodies, between the visible and the invisible powers of the universe.
"That which science calls gravitation the ancient and the medieval
hermeticists called magnetism, attraction, affinity." She continues:
"A thorough familiarity with the occult faculties of everything existing
in Nature, visible as well as invisible; their mutual relations, attractions
and repulsions; the cause of these traced to the spiritual principle which
pervades and animates all things; the ability to furnish the best conditions
for this principle to manifest itself, in other words a profound and exhaustive
knowledge of natural law--this was and is the basis of magic."26
Out of man's kinship with nature, his identity of constitution with it, she
argues to his magical powers:
"As God creates, so man can create. Given a certain intensity of will, and
the shapes created by the mind become subjective. Hallucinations they are
called, although to their creator they are real as any visible object is to any
one else. Given a more intense and intelligent concentration of this will, and
the forms become concrete, visible, objective; the man has learned the secret
of secrets; he is a Magician."27
She makes it clear that this power is built on the conscious control of the
substrate of the material universe. She states that the key to all magic is the
formula: "Every insignificant atom is moved by spirit." Magic is thus
conditioned upon the postulation of an omnipresent vital ether, electro-spiritual
in composition, to which man has an affinity by virtue of his being identical
in essence with it. Over it he can learn to exercise a voluntary control by the
exploitation of his own psycho-dynamic faculties. If he can lay his hand on the
elemental substance of the universe, if he can radiate from his ganglionic
batteries currents of force equivalent to gamma rays, of course he can step
into the cosmic scene with something of a magician's powers. That such an ether
exists she states in a hundred places. She calls it the elementary substance,
the Astral Light, the Alkahest, the
______________
26 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 243.
27 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 62.
133
Akasha. It is the universal principle of all life, the vehicle or battery of
cosmic energy. She says Newton knew of it and called it "the soul of the
world," the "divine sensorium." It is the Book of Life; the
memory of God,--since it never gives up an impression. Human memory is but a
looking into pictures on this ether. Clairvoyants and psychometers but draw
upon its resources through synchronous vibrations.
"According to the Kabalistic doctrine the future exits in the astral light
in embryo as the present existed in embryo in the past . . . and our memories
are but the glimpses that we catch of the reflections of this past in the
currents of the astral light, as the psychometer catches them from the astral
emanations of the object held by him."28
Madame Blavatsky goes so far as to link the control of these properties with
the tiny pulsations of the magnetic currents emanating from our brains, under
the impelling power of will. Thus she attempts to unite magic with the most
subtle conceptions of our own advanced physics and chemistry. She thus weds the
most arrant of superstitions with the most respected of sciences.
The magnetic nature of gravitation is set forth in more than one passage. She
wrote:
"The ethereal spiritual fire, the soul and the spirit of the all-pervading
mysterious ether; the despair and puzzle of the materialists, who will some day
find out that that which causes the numberless forces to manifest themselves in
eternal correlation is but a divine electricity, or rather galvanism, and that
the sun is one of the myriad magnets disseminated through space. . . . There is
no gravitation in the Newtonian sense, but only magnetic attraction and
repulsion; and it is only by their magnetism that the planets of
______________
28 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 184. Theosophists appear to be in the habit of
using the terms Akasha and Astral Light more or less synonymously. In the Glossary
Madame Blavatsky defines Akasha (Akasa, Akaz) as "the subtle
supersensuous spiritual essence which pervades all spaces; the primordial
substance erroneously identified with Ether. But it is to Ether what Spirit is
to Matter, or Atma to Kamarupa. It is in fact the Universal Space in which lies
inherent the eternal Ideation of the Universe in its ever-changing aspects on
the plane of matter and objectivity. This power is the . . . same anima mundi
on the higher plane as the astral light is on the lower."
134
the solar system have their motions regulated in their respective orbits by the
still more powerful magnetism of the sun; not by their weight or gravitation. .
. . The passage of light through this (cosmic ether) must produce enormous
friction. Friction generates electricity and it is this electricity and its
correlative magnetism which forms those tremendous forces of nature. . . . It
is not at all to the sun that we are indebted for light and heat; light is a
creation sui generis, which springs into existence at the instant when the
deity willed." She "laughs at the current theory of the incandescence
of the sun and its gaseous substance. . . . The sun, planets, stars and nebulae
are all magnets. . . . There is but One Magnet in the universe and from it
proceeds the magnetization of everything existing."29
It is this same universal ether and its inherent magnetic dynamism that sets
the field for astrology, as a cosmic science. Of this she says that astrology
is a science as infallible as astronomy itself, provided its interpreters are
as infallible as the mathematicians. She carries the law of the instantaneous
interrelation of everything in the cosmos to such an extent that, quoting
Eliphas Levi, "even so small a thing as the birth of one child upon our
insignificant planet has its effect upon the universe, as the whole universe
has its reflective influence upon him." The bodies of the entire universe
are bound together by attractions which hold them in equilibrium, and these
magnetic influences are the bases of astrology.
With so much cosmic power at his behest, man has done wonders; and we are asked
to accept the truth of an amazing series of the most phenomenal occurrences
ever seriously given forth. They range over so varied a field that any attempt
at classification is impossible. Of physical phenomena she says that the
ancients could make marble statues sweat, and even speak and leap! They had
gold lamps which burned in tombs continuously for seven hundred to one thousand
years without refueling! One hundred and seventy-three authorities are said to
have testified to the existence of such lamps. Even "Aladdin's magical
lamp
______________
29 Isis Unveiled, Vol. I, p . 271 ff.
135
has also certain claims to reality." There was an asbestos oil whose
properties, when it was rubbed on the skin, made the body impervious to the
action of fire. Witnesses are quoted as stating that they observed natives in
Africa who permitted themselves to be fired at point blank with a revolver,
having first precipitated around them an impervious layer of astral or akashic
substance. Cardinal de Rohan's testimony is adduced to the effect that he had
seen Cagliostro make gold and diamonds. The power of the evil eye is enlarged
upon and instances recounted of persons hypnotizing, "charming," or
even killing birds and animals with a look. She avers that she herself had seen
Eastern Adepts turn water into blood. Observers are quoted who reported a
rope-climbing feat in China and Batavia, in which the human climbers
disappeared overhead, their members fell in portions on the ground, and shortly
thereafter reunited to form the original living bodies! Stories are narrated of
fakirs disemboweling and re-embowling themselves. She herself saw whirling
dancers at Petrovsk in 1865, who cut themselves in frenzy and evoked by the
magical powers of blood the spirits of the dead, with whom they then danced.
Twice she was nearly bitten by poisonous snakes, but was saved by a word of
control from a Shaman or conjurer. The close affinity between man and nature is
illustrated by the statement that in one case a tree died following the death
of its human twin. Speaking of magical trees, she several times tells of the
great tree Kumboum, of Tibet, over whose leaves and bark nature had imprinted
ten thousand spiritual maxims. The magical significance of birthmarks is
brought out, with remarkable instances. She dwells at length on the inability
of medical men to tell definitely whether the human body is dead or not, and
cites a dozen gruesome tales of reawakening in the grave. This takes her into
vampirism, which she establishes on the basis of numerous cases taken mostly
from Russian folklore. It is stated that the Hindu pantheon claimed 330,000,000
types of spirits. Moses was familiar with electricity; the Egyptians had a high
order of music and chess over five
136
thousand years ago; and anaesthesia was known to the ancients. Perpetual
motion, the Elixer of Life, the Fountain of Youth and the Philosopher's Stone are
declared to be real. She adduces in every case a formidable show of testimony
other than her own. And back of it all is her persistent assertion that purity
of life and thought is a requisite for high magical performance.
"A man free from worldly incentives and sensuality may cure in such a way
the most 'incurable' diseases, and his vision may become clear and
prophetic."30
"The magic power is never possessed by those addicted to vicious
indulgences."31
Phenomena come, she feels, rather easily; spiritual life is harder won and
worthier.
"With expectancy, supplemented by faith, one can cure himself of almost
any morbific condition. The tomb of a saint; a holy relic; a talisman; a bit of
paper or a garment that has been handled by a supposed healer; a nostrum, a
penance; a ceremonial; a laying on of hands; or a few words impressively
pronounced--will do. It is a question of temperament, imagination,
self-cure."32
"While phenomena of a physical nature may have their value as a means of
arousing the interest of materialists, and confirming, if not wholly, at least
inferentially, our belief in the survival of our souls, it is questionable
whether, under their present aspect, the modern phenomena are not doing more
harm than good."33
Theosophists themselves often quarrel with Isis because it seems to
overstress bizarre phenomena. They should see that Volume I of the book aims to
show the traces of magic in ancient science, in order to offset the
Spiritualist claims to new discoveries, and to attract attention to the more
philosophic ideas underlying classic magic. Volume II labors to reveal the
presence of a vast occultism behind the religions and theologies of the world.
Again the contention is that
______________
30 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 210.
31 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 218.
32 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 216.
33 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 218.
137
the ancient priests knew more than the modern expositor, that they kept more
concealed than the present-day theologian has revealed. Modern theology has
lost its savor of early truth and power, as modern technology no longer
possesses the "lost arts." Paganism was to be vindicated as against
ecclesiastical orthodoxies.
She believed that her instruction under the Lamas or Adepts in Tibet had given
her this key, and that therefore the whole vast territory of ancient religion
lay unfruitful for modern understanding until she should come forward and put
the key to the lock. The "key" makes her in a sense the exponent and
depository of "the essential veracities of all the religions and philosophies
that are or ever were."
"Myth was the favorite and universal method of teaching in archaic
times."34
We can not be oblivious of the use made by Plato of myths in his theoretical
constructions.
"Fairy tales do not exclusively belong to nurseries; all mankind--except
those few who in all ages have comprehended their hidden meaning, and tried to
open the eyes of the superstitious--have listened to such tales in one shape or
other, and, after transforming them into sacred symbols, called the product Religion."35
"There are a few myths in any religious system but have an historical as
well as a scientific foundation. Myths, as Pococke ably expresses it, 'are now
found to be fables just in proportion as we misunderstand them; truths,
in proportion as they were once understood.'"36
The esotericism of the teachings of Christ and the Buddha is manifest to anyone
who can reason, she declares. Neither can be supposed to have given out all
that a divine being would know.
"It is a poor compliment paid the Supreme, this forcing upon him four
gospels, in which, contradictory as they often are, there is not a single
narrative, sentence or peculiar expression, whose
______________
34 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 493.
35 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 406.
36 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 431.
138
parallel may not be found in some older doctrine of philosophy. Surely the
Almighty--were it but to spare future generations their present
perplexity--might have brought down with Him, at His first and only incarnation
on earth, something original--something that would trace a distinct line of
demarcation between Himself and the score or so of incarnate Pagan gods, who
had been born of virgins, had all been saviors, and were either killed or were
otherwise sacrificed for humanity."37
She says that not she but the Christian Fathers and their successors in the
church have put their divine Son of God in the position of a poor religious
plagiarist!
Ancient secret wisdom was seldom written down at all; it was taught orally, and
imparted as a priceless tradition by one set of students to their qualified
successors. Those receiving it regarded themselves as its custodians and they
accepted their stewardship conscientiously.
To understand the reason for esotericism in science and religion in earlier
times, Madame Blavatsky urges us to recall that freedom of speech invited
persecution.
"The Rosicrucian, Hermetic and Theosophical Western writers, producing
their books in epochs of religious ignorance and cruel bigotry, wrote, so to
say, with the headman's axe suspended over their necks, or the executioner's
fagots laid under their chairs, and hid their divine knowledge under quaint
symbols and misleading metaphors."38
To give lesser people what they could not appropriate, to stir complacent
conservatism with that threat of disturbing old established habitudes which
higher knowledge always brings, was unsafe in a world still actuated by codes
of arbitrary physical power. High knowledge had to be esoteric until the
progress of general enlightenment brought the masses to a point where the worst
that could happen to the originator of revolutionary ideas would be the
reputation of an idiot, instead of the doom of a Bruno or a Joan. Madame
Blavatsky was willing to be regarded as an idiot, but
______________
37 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 337.
38 Quoted in Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, p. 106.
139
her Masters could not send her forth until autos-da-fé had gone out of vogue.
We have seen in an earlier chapter that the Mystery Religions of the Eastern
Mediterranean world harbored an esotericism that presumably influenced the
formulation of later systems, notably Judaism and Christianity. In recent
decades more attention has been given to the claims of these old secret
societies. St. Paul's affiliation with them is claimed by Theosophists, and his
obvious indebtedness to them is acknowledged by some students of early
Christianity. It is impossible for Madame Blavatsky to understand the Church's
indifference to its origins, and she arrays startling columns of evidence to
show that this neglect may be fatal. The Mystery Schools, she proclaims, were
not shallow cults, but the guardians of a deep lore already venerable.
"The Mysteries are as old as the world, and one well versed in the
esoteric mythologies of various nations, can trace them back to the days of the
Ante-Vedic period in India."39
She does not soften her animosity against those influences and agencies that
she charges with culpability for smothering out the Gnosis. The culprit in the
case is Christianity.
"For over fifteen centuries, thanks to the blindly-brutal persecution of
those great vandals of early Christian history, Constantine and Justinian,
ancient wisdom slowly degenerated until it gradually sank into the deepest mire
of monkish superstition and ignorance. The Pythagorean 'knowledge of things
that are'; the profound erudition of the Gnostics; the world- and time-honored
teachings of the great philosophers; all were rejected as doctrines of
Antichrist and Paganism and committed to the flames. With the last seven Wise
Men of the Orient, the remnant group of Neo-Platonists, Hermias, Priscianus,
Diogenes, Eulalius, Damaskius, Simplicius and Isodorus, who fled from the
fanatical persecutions of Justinian to Persia, the reign of wisdom closed. The
books of Thoth . . . containing within their sacred pages the spiritual and
physical history of the creation and progress of our world, were left to mould
in oblivion and contempt for ages. They found no interpreters in Christian
Europe; the Philalethians, or wise
______________
39 Isis Unveiled, Vol. II, p. 98.
140
'lovers of truth' were no more; they were replaced by the light-fleers, the
tonsured and hooded monks of Papal Rome, who dread truth, in whatever shape and
from whatever quarter it appears, if it but clashes in the least with their
dogmas."40
She speaks of the
"Jesuitical and crafty spirit which prompted the Christian Church of the
late third century to combat the expiring Neo-Platonic and Eclectic Schools.
The Church was afraid of the Aristotelian dialectic and wished to conceal the
true meaning of the word daemon, Rasit, asdt (emanations); for if the truth of
the emanations were rightly understood, the whole structure of the new religion
would have crumbled along with the Mysteries."41
This motive is stressed again when she says that the Fathers had borrowed so
much from Paganism that they had to obliterate the traces of their
appropriations or be recognized by all as merely Neo-Platonists! She is keen to
point out the value of the riches thus thrown away or blindly overlooked, and
to show how Christianity has been placed at the mercy of hostile disrupting
forces because of its want of a true Gnosis. She avers that atheists and
materialists now gnaw at the heart of Christianity because it is helpless,
lacking the esoteric knowledge of the spiritual constitution of the universe,
to combat or placate them. Gnosticism taught man that he could attain the
fulness of the stature of his innate divinity; Christianity substituted a
weakling's reliance upon a higher power. Had Christianity held onto the Gnosis
and Kabbalism, it would not have had to graft itself onto Judaism and thus tie
itself down to many of the developments of a merely tribal religion. Had it not
accepted the Jehovah of Moses, she says, it would not have been forced to look
upon the Gnostic ideas as heresies, and the world would now have had a religion
richly based on pure Platonic philosophy and "surely something would then
have been gained." Rome itself, Christianized, paid a heavy penalty for spurning
the wisdom of old:
______________
40 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 32.
41 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 34.
141
"In burning the works of the theurgists; in proscribing those who affected
their study; in affixing the stigma of demonolatry to magic in general; Rome
has left her exoteric worship and Bible to be helplessly riddled by every
free-thinker, her sexual emblems to be identified with coarseness, and her
priests to unwittingly turn magicians and sorcerers in their exorcisms. Thus
retribution, by the exquisite adjustment of divine law, is made to overtake
this scheme of cruelty, injustice and bigotry, through her own suicidal
acts."42
Yet Christianity drew heavily from paganism. It erected almost no novel
formulations. Christian canonical books are hardly more than plagiarisms of
older literatures, she affirms, compiled, deleted, revised, and twisted. She
believed that the first chapters of Genesis were based on the
"Chaldean" Kabbala and an old Brahmanical book of prophecies (really
later than Genesis). The doctrine of the Trinity as purely Platonic, she
says. It was Irenaeus who identified Jesus with the "mask of the Logos or
Second Person of the Trinity." The doctrine of the Atonement came from the
Gnostics. The Eucharist was common before Christ's time. Some Neo-Platonist,
not John, is alleged to have written the Fourth Gospel. The Sermon on the Mount
is an echo of the essential principles of monastic Buddhism.
Jesus is torn away from allegiance to the Jewish system and stands neither as
its product nor its Messiah. Wresting him away from Judaism, and likewise from
the emanational Trinity, both of which rôles were thrust upon him gratuitously
by the Christian Fathers, she declares him to have been a Nazarene, i.e.,
a member of the mystic cult of Essenes of Nazars, which perpetuated Oriental
systems of the Gnosis on the shores of the Jordan.
"One Nazarene sect is known to have existed some 150 years B.C. and to
have lived on the banks of the Jordan, and on the eastern shore of the Dead
Sea, according to Pliny and Josephus. But in King's 'Gnostics' we find quoted
another statement by Josephus from verse 13 which says that the Essenes had
been established on the shores of the Dead Sea 'for thousands of ages' before
Pliny's time."43
______________
42 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 121 43 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 139.
142
Jesus, one of this cult, had become adept in the occult philosophies of Egypt
and Israel, and endeavored to make of the two a synthesis, drawing at times on
more ancient knowledge from the old Hindu doctrines. He was simply a devout
occultist and taught among the people what they could receive of the esoteric
knowledge, reserving his deeper teachings for his fellows in the Essene
monasteries. He had learned in the East and in Egypt the high science of
theurgy, casting out of demons, and control of nature's finer forces, and he
used these powers upon occasion. He posed as no Messiah or Incarnation of the
Logos, but preached the message of the anointing (Christos) of the human spirit
by its baptismal union with the higher principles of our divine nature.44
In short, Madame Blavatsky leaves to Christianity little but the very
precarious distinction of having "copied all its rites, dogmas and
ceremonies from paganism" save two that can be claimed as original
inventions--the doctrine of eternal damnation (with the fiction of the Devil)
"and the one custom, that of the anathema."
"The Bible of the Christian Church is the latest receptacle of this scheme
of disfigured allegories which have been erected into an edifice of
superstition, such as never entered into the conceptions of those from whom the
Church obtained her knowledge. The abstract fictions of antiquity, which for
ages had filled the popular fancy with but flickering shadows and uncertain
images, have in Christianity assumed the shapes of real personages and become
historical facts. Allegory metamorphosed, becomes sacred history, and Pagan
myth is taught to the people as a revealed narrative of God's intercourse with
His chosen people."45
The final proposition which Isis labors to establish is that the one
source of all the wisdom of the past is India. Pythag-
______________
44 A wealth of curious citations is drawn up behind these positions. The whole
Passion Week story is stated to be the reproduction of the drama of initiation
into the Mysteries, and not to have taken place in historical fact. And
practically every other chapter of Christ's life story is paralleled in the
lives of the twenty or more "World Saviors," including Thoth, Orpheus,
Vyasa, Buddha, Krishna, Dionysus, Osiris, Zoroaster, Zagreus, Apollonius, and
others.
45 Isis Unveiled, Vol. II, p. 406.
143
oreanism, she says, is identical with Buddhistic teachings. "The laws of
Manu are the doctrines of Plato, Philo, Zoroaster, Pythagoras and the
Kabala." She quotes Jacolliot, the French writer:
"This philosophy, the traces of which we find among the Magians, the
Chaldeans, the Egyptians, the Hebrew Kabalists, and the Christians, is none
other than that of the Hindu Brahmans, the sectarians of the pitris, or the
spirits of the invisible worlds which surround us."46
She, with the key in her hand, sees the solution of the problem of comparative
religion as an easy one.
"While we see the few translators of the Kabala, the Nazarene Codex and
other abstruse works, hopelessly floundering amid the interminable pantheon of
names, unable to agree as to a system in which to classify them, for the one
hypothesis contradicts and overturns the other, we can but wonder at all this
trouble, which could be so easily overcome. But even now, when the translation
and even the perusal of the ancient Sanskrit has become so easy as a point of
comparison, they would never think it possible that every philosophy--whether
Semitic, Hamitic or Turanian, as they call it, has its key in the Hindu sacred
works. Still, facts are there and facts are not easily destroyed."47
"What has been contemptuously termed Paganism was ancient Wisdom replete
with Deity. . . . Pre-Vedic Brahmanism and Buddhism are the double source from
which all religions spring; Nirvana is the ocean to which all tend."48
She says there are many parallelisms between references to Buddha and to
Christ. Many points of identity also exist between Lamaico-Buddhistic and Roman
Catholic ceremonies. The idea here hinted at is the underlying thesis of the
whole Theosophic position. Successive members of the great Oriental Brotherhood
have been incarnated at intervals in the history of mankind, each giving out
portions of the one central doctrine, which therefore must have a common base.
The puzzling identities found in the study of
______________
46 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 38.
47 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 227.
48 Ibid., Vol. II, p. 639.
144
Comparative Religion thus find an explanation in the identity of their authorship.
Mrs. Annie Besant later elaborated this view in the early pages of her work, Esoteric
Christianity. She contrasts it with the commonly accepted explanation of
religious origins of the academicians of our day. Summing up this position she
writes:
"The Comparative Mythologists contend that the common origin is a common
ignorance, and that the loftiest religious doctrines are simply refined
expressions of the crude and barbarous guesses of savages, of primitive men,
regarding themselves and their surroundings. Animism, fetishism,
nature-worship--these are the constituents of the primitive mud out of which
has grown the splendid lily of religion. A Krishna, a Buddha, a Lao-Tze, a
Jesus, are the highly civilized, but lineal descendants of the whirling medicine-men
of the savage. God is a composite photograph of the innumerable gods who are
the personifications of the forces of nature. It is all summed up in the
phrase: Religions are branches from a common trunk--human ignorance.
"The Comparative Religionists consider, on the other hand, that all
religions originated from the teachings of Divine Men, who gave out to the
different nations, from time to time, such parts of the verities of religion as
the people are capable of receiving, teaching ever the same morality,
inculcating the use of similar means, employing the same significant symbols.
The savage religions--animism and the rest--are degenerations, the results of
decadence, distorted and dwarfed descendants of true religious beliefs.
Sun-worship and pure forms of nature worship were, in their day, noble
religions, highly allegorical, but full of profound truth and knowledge. The
great Teachers . . . form an enduring Brotherhood of men, who have risen beyond
humanity, who appear at certain periods to enlighten the world, and who are the
spiritual guardians of the human race. This view may be summed up in the
phrase: Religions are branches from a common trunk--Divine Wisdom."49
This is the view of religions which Madame Blavatsky presented in Isis.
Religions, it would say, never rise; they only degenerate. Theosophic writers50
are at pains to point
______________
49 Dr. Annie Besant: Esoteric Christianity, p. 8.
50 E.g., cf. C. W. Leadbeater: The Christian Creed.
145
out that once a pure high religious impulse is given by a Master-Teacher, it
tends before long to gather about it the incrustations of the human
materializing tendency, under which the spiritual truths are obscured and
finally lost amid the crudities of literalism. Then after the world has
blundered on through a period of darkness the time grows ripe for a new
revelation, and another member of the Spiritual Fraternity comes into
terrestrial life. Madame Blavatsky says:
"The very corner-stone of their (Brahmans' and Buddhists') religious systems
is periodical incarnations of the Deity. Whenever humanity is about merging
into materialism and moral degradation, a Supreme Being incarnates himself in
his creature selected for the purpose, . . . Christna saying to Arjuna (in the Bhagavad
Gita): 'As often as virtue declines in the world, I make myself manifest to
save it.'"51
Madame Blavatsky stated that she was in contact with several of these supermen,
who sent her forth as their messenger to impart, in new form, the old
knowledge.
_____________
51 Isis Unveiled, Vol. II, p. 535.
146
CHAPTER VI
THE MAHATMAS AND THEIR LETTERS
The Masters whom Theosophy presents to us are simply high-ranking students in
life's school of experience. They are members of our own evolutionary group,
not visitants from the celestial spheres. They are supermen only in that they
have attained knowledge of the laws of life and mastery over its forces with
which we are still struggling. They are also termed by Theosophists the
"just men made perfect," the finished products of our terrene
experience, those more earnest souls of our own race who have pressed forward
to attain the fulness of the stature of Christ, the prize of the high calling
of God in Christhood. They are not Gods come down to earth, but earthly mortals
risen to the status of Christs. They ask from us no reverence, no worship; they
demand no allegiance but that which it is expected we shall render to the
principles of Truth and Fact, and to the nobility of life. They are our
"Elder Brothers," not distant deities; and will even make their
presence known to us and grant us the privilege of coöperating with them when
we have shown ourselves capable of working unselfishly for mankind. They are
not our Masters in the sense of holding lordship over us; they are the
"Masters of Wisdom and Compassion." Moved by an infinite sympathy
with the whole human race they have renounced their right to go forward to more
splendid conquests in the evolutionary field, and have remained in touch with
man in order to throw the weight of their personal force on the side of
progress.
But the rank of the Mahatmas must not be underrated because they still fall
under the category of human beings. They have accumulated vast stores of
knowledge about the life of man and the uni-
147
verse; about the meaning and purpose of evolution; the methods of progress; the
rationale of the expansion of the powers latent in the Ego; the choice and
attainment of ends and values in life; and the achievement of beauty and
grandeur in individual development. Upon all these questions which affect the
life and happiness of mortals they possess competent knowledge which they are
willing to impart to qualified students. They have by virtue of their own force
of character mastered every human problem, perfected their growth in beauty,
gained control over all the natural forces of life. They stand at the
culmination of all human endeavor. They have lifted mortality up to
immortality, have carried humanity aloft to divinity. Through the mediatorship
of the Christos, or spiritual principle in them, they have reconciled the
carnal nature of man, his animal soul, with the essential divinity of his
higher Self. And they, if they have been lifted up, stand patiently eager to
draw all men unto them.
Madame Blavatsky's exploitation of the Adepts (or their exploitation of her) is
a startling event in the modern religious drama. It was a unique procedure and
took the world by surprise. To be sure, India and Tibet, even China, were
familiar with the idea of supermen. India had its Buddhas, Boddhisatvas, and
Rishis. But what not even India was prepared to view without suspicion was that
several of the hierarchical Brotherhood should carry on a clandestine
intercourse with a nondescript group, made up of a Russian, an American, and
several Englishmen, and issue to them fragments of the ancient lore for
broadcasting to the incredulous West, which would mock it, scorn it, and
trample it underfoot.
It was only justified, according to Madame Blavatsky, by certain considerations
which influenced the final decision of the Great White Brotherhood Council.
Majority opinion was against the move; but the minority urged that two reasons
rendered it advisable. The guillotine and the fagot pile had been eliminated
from the historical forms of martyrdom; and, secondly, the esotericism of the
doctrines was, in a manner,
148
an automatic safety device. The teachings would appeal to those who were
"ready" for them; their meaning would soar over the heads of those
for whom they were not suited.
The matter was decided affirmatively, we are informed, by the assumption of
full karmic responsibility for the launching of the crusade by the two Adepts,
Morya and Koot Hoomi Lal Singh. The latter, in the early portion of his present
incarnation, had been a student at an English University and felt that he had
found sufficient reliability on the part of intelligent Europeans to make them
worthy to receive the great knowledge. Morya, we are told, had taken on Madame
Blavatsky as his personal attaché, pupil or chela. She had earned in former
situations the right to the high commission of carrying the old truth to the
world at large in the last quarter of the nineteenth century.
It is hinted that Madame Blavatsky had formed a close link with the Master Morya
in former births, when she was known to him as a great personage. It is also
said that she was herself kept from full admission to the Brotherhood only by
some special "Karma" which needed to be "worked out" in a
comparatively humble station and personality during this life. She said the
Masters knew what she was accountable for, though it was not the charlatanism
the world at large charged her with. We are led to assume that the Master Morya
exercised a guardianship over her in early life, and later, that he
occasionally manifested himself to her, giving her suggestions and
encouragement. One or two of these encounters with her Master are recorded. She
met him in his physical body in London in 1851. In one of her old note-books,
which her aunt Madame Fadeef sent to her in Würzburg in 1885, there is a
memorandum of her meeting with Morya in London. The entry is as follows:
"Nuit mémorable. Certaine nuit par un clair de lune que se couchait
à--Ramsgate--12 août, 1851,--lorsque je rencontrai le Maître de mes
rêves."
Hints are thrown out as to other meetings on her travels, and we are told that
she studied ancient philosophy and
149
science under the Master's direct tutelage in Tibet covering periods
aggregating at least seven years of her life. The testimony of Col. Olcott is
no less precise. He says:
"I had ocular proof that at least some of those who worked with us were
living men, from having seen them in the flesh in India, after having seen them
in the astral body in America and in Europe; from having touched and talked
with them. Instead of telling me that they were spirits, they told me they were
as much alive as myself, and that each of them had his own peculiarities and
capabilities, in short, his complete individuality. They told me that what they
had attained to I should one day myself acquire, how soon would depend entirely
on myself; and that I might not anticipate anything whatever from favor, but,
like them, must gain every step, every inch, of progress by my own
exertions."1
The fact that the Masters were living human beings made their revelations of
cosmic and spiritual truth, say the Theosophists, more valuable than alleged
revelations from hypothetical Gods in other systems of belief. That their
knowledge is, in a manner of speaking, human instead of heavenly or
"divine" should give it greater validity for us. The Mahatmas were,
it is said, in direct contact with the next higher grades of intelligent beings
standing above them in the hierarchical order, so that their teachings have the
double worth of high human and supernal authority. This, occultists believe,
affords the most trustworthy type of revelation.
It was not until the two Theosophic Founders had reached India, in whose
northernmost vastnesses the members of the Great White Brotherhood were said to
maintain their earthly residence, that continuous evidence of their reality and
their leadership was vouchsafed. The Theosophic case for Adept revelation rests
upon a long-continued correspondence between persons (Mr. A. P. Sinnett, mainly,
Mr. A. O. Hume, Damodar and others in minor degree) of good intelligence, but
claiming no mystical or psychical illumination, and the two Mahatmas, K.H. and
M. Sinnett, Editor of The Pioneer, at Simla in northern India, was an
English
______________
1 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. I, of June, 1893.
150
journalist of distinction and ability. Although he had manifested no special
temperamental disposition toward the mystical or occult, he was the particular
recipient of the attention and favors of the Mahatmas over a space of three or
four years, beginning about 1879. It was at his own home in Simla, later at
Allahabad, that most of the letters were received, addressed to him personally.
Most, if not all, were in answer to the queries which he was permitted, if not
invited, to ask his respected teachers.
Mr. Sinnett's book, The Occult World, was the first direct statement to
the West of the existence of the Masters and their activity as sponsors for the
Theosophical Society. He undertook the onerous task of vindicating, as far as
argument and the phenomenal material in his hands could, the title of these
supermen to the possession of surpassing knowledge and sublime wisdom. His work
supplemented that of Madame Blavatsky in Isis, yet it went beyond the
latter in asserting the connection of the Theosophical Society with an alleged
association of perfected individuals. It put the Theosophical Society squarely
on record as an organization, not merely for the purpose of eclectic research,
but standing for the promulgation of a body of basic truths of an esoteric sort
and arrogating to itself a position of unique eminence in a spiritual world
order.
In the Introduction to The Occult World Mr. Sinnett elaborates his
apologetic for the general theory of Mahatmic existence and knowledge.
Fundamental for his argument is, of course, the theory of reincarnational
continuity of development which would enable individual humans, through long
experience, to attain degrees of learning far in advance of the majority of the
race. But his "proofs" of both the existence and the superior
knowledge of these exceptional beings are offered in the book itself, in which
his experience with them, and the material of some of their letters to him, are
presented. His introductory dissertation is a justification of the Mahatmic
policy of maintaining their priceless knowledge in futile obscurity within the
narrow confines of their exclusive Brotherhood. He then attempts to rectify
151
our scornful point of view as regards esotericism. Of the superlative wisdom of
the Masters he posits his own direct knowledge. The Brothers are to him
empirically real. But the logical justification of their attitude of seclusion
and aloofness, or worse, of their selfish appropriation of knowledge which it
must be assumed would be of immense social value if disseminated, is the point
upon which he chiefly labors.
"There is a school of philosophy," he says, "still in existence
of which modern culture has lost sight . . . modern metaphysics, and to a large
extent modern physical science, have been groping for centuries blindly after
knowledge which occult philosophy has enjoyed in full measure all the while.
Owing to a train of fortunate circumstances I have come to know that
this is the case; I have come into contact with persons who are heirs of a
greater knowledge concerning the mysteries of Nature and humanity than modern
culture has yet evolved. . . . Modern science has accomplished grand results by
the open method of investigation, and is very impatient of the theory that
persons who have attained to real knowledge, either in science or metaphysics,
could have been content to hide their light under a bushel. . . . But there is
no need to construct hypotheses in the matter. The facts are accessible if they
are sought for in the right way."2
Spiritual science is foremost with the Adepts; physical science being of
secondary importance. The main strength of occultism has been devoted to the
science of metaphysical energy and to the development of faculties in man, not
instruments outside him, which will yield him actual experimental knowledge of
the subtle powers in nature. It aims to gain actual and exact knowledge of
spiritual things which, under all other systems, remain the subject of
speculation or blind religious faith.
Summing up the extraordinary powers which Adeptship gives its practitioners, he
says they are chiefly the ability to dissociate consciousness from the body, to
put it instantaneously in rapport with other minds anywhere on the earth,
______________
2 A. P. Sinnett: The Occult World, p. 1.
152
and to exert magical control over the sublimated energies of matter. Occultism
postulates a basic differentiation between the principles of mind, soul, and
spirit, and gives a formal technique for their interrelated development. It has
evolved a practique, also, based on the spiritual constitution of matter,
which, it alleges, vastly facilitates human growth. The skilled occultist is
able to shift his consciousness from one to another plane of manifestation. In
short, his control over the vibrational energies of the Akasha makes him
veritably lord of all the physical creation.
The members of the Brotherhood remain in more or less complete seclusion among
the Himalayas because, as they have said, they find contact with the coarse
heavy currents of ordinary human emotionalism--violent feeling, material
grasping, and base ambitions--painful to their sensitive organization. This
great fraternity is at once the least and most exclusive body in the world; it
is composed of the world's very elect, yet any human being is eligible. He must
have demonstrated his possession of the required qualifications, which are so
high that the average mortal must figure on aeons of education before he can
knock at the portals of their spiritual society. The road thither is beset with
many real perils, which no one can safely pass till he has proven his mastery
over his own nature and that of the world.
"The ultimate development of the adept requires amongst other things a
life of absolute physical purity, and the candidate must, from the beginning,
give practical evidence of his willingness to adopt this. He must . . . for all
the years of his probation, be perfectly chaste, perfectly abstemious, and
indifferent to physical luxury of every sort. This regimen does not involve any
fantastic discipline or obtrusive ascetism, nor withdrawal from the world.
There would be nothing to prevent a gentleman in ordinary society from being in
some of the preliminary stages of training without anybody about him being the
wiser. For true occultism, the sublime achievement of the real adept, is not
attained through the loathsome ascetism of the ordinary Indian fakeer, the yogi
of the woods and wilds, whose dirt accumulates with his sanctity--of
153
the fanatic who fastens iron hooks into his flesh or holds up an arm till it
withers."3
How did the Mahatmas impart their teaching? Mr. Sinnett was the channel of
transmission, and to him the two Masters sent a long series of letters on
philosophical and other subjects, they themselves remaining in the background. The
Mahatma Letters themselves, as originally received by Mr. Sinnett, were not
published until 1925.4 Sinnett, early in his acquaintance with the Masters,
asked K.H. for the privilege of a personal interview with him. The Master
declined. His messages came in the form of long letters which dropped into his
possession by facile means that would render the Post Office authorities of any
nation both envious and sceptical. The correspondence began when Madame
Blavatsky suggested that Mr. Sinnett write certain questions which were on his
mind in a letter addressed to K.H., saying she would dispatch it to him,
several hundred miles distant, by the exercise of her magnetic powers. She
would accompany it with the request for a reply. The idea in Mr. Sinnett's mind
was one which he thought, could the Adept actually carry it out, would
demonstrate at one stroke the central theses of occultism and practically
revolutionize the whole trend of human thinking. His suggestion to K.H. in that
first letter was that the Mahatma should use his superior power to reproduce in
far-off India, on the same morning on which it issued from the press, a full
copy of the London Times. Madame Blavatsky disintegrated the missive and
wafted its particles to the hermit in the mountains. The answer came in two
days. The test of the London newspaper, he wrote, was inadmissible precisely
because "it would close the mouths of the sceptics." The world is
unprepared for so convincing a demonstration of supernormal powers, he argued,
because, on the one hand the event would throw the principles and formulae of
science
______________
3 Ibid., p. 14. More detailed requirements in the way of preparation for
Adeptship will be set forth when we undertake the general critique of the
occult life, in Chapter XI.
4 In 1883 he published the general outlines of the cosmology involved in their
communications in a work called Esoteric Buddhism.
154
into chaos, and on the other, it would demolish the structure of the concepts
of natural law by the restoration of the belief in "miracle." The
result would thus be disastrous for both science and faith. Incompetent as the
thesis of mechanistic naturalism is to provide mortals with the ground of
understanding of the deeper phenomena of life and mind, it does less harm on
the whole than would a return to arrant superstition such as must follow in the
wake of the wonder Sinnett had proposed. The Master asked his correspondent if
the modern world had really thrown off the shackles of ignorant prejudice and
religious bigotry to a sufficient extent to enable it to withstand the shock
that such an occurrence would bring to its fixed ideas. If this one test were
furnished, he went on, Western incredulity would in a moment ask for others and
still others; shrewd ingenuity would devise ever more bizarre performances; and
since not all the millions of sceptics could be given ocular demonstrations,
the net outcome of the whole procedure would be confusion and unhappiness. The
mass of humanity must feel its way slowly toward these high powers, and the
premature exhibition of future capacity would but overwhelm the mind and
unsettle the poise of people everywhere.
Mr. Sinnett replied, venturing to believe "that the European mind was less
hopelessly intractable than Koot Hoomi had represented it." The Master's
second letter continued his protestations:
"The Mysteries never were, never can be, put within reach of the general
public, not, at least, until the longed-for day when our religious philosophy
becomes universal. At no time have more than a scarcely appreciable minority of
men possessed Nature's secret, though multitudes have witnessed the practical
evidences of the possibility of their possession."
Letters followed on both sides, Mr. Sinnett taking advantage of many
opportunities afforded by varying circumstances in each case to fortify his
assurance that Madame Blavatsky herself was not inditing the replies in the
name of the Adept. Frequently replies came, containing specific reference to
detailed matters in his missives, when she had not been out
155
of his sight during the interim between the despatch and the return. The
letters came and went as well when she was hundreds of miles away. The answers
would often be found in his locked desk drawer, sometimes inside his own
letter, the seal of which had not been broken. On occasion the Mahatma's reply
dropped from the open air upon his desk while he was watching.
Madame Blavatsky and the Master both explained the method by which the letters
were written. Theoretically, they were not written at all, but
"precipitated." Among the Adept's occult or "magical"
powers is that of impressing upon the surface of some material, as paper, the
images which he holds vividly before his mind. He may thus impress or imprint a
photograph, a scene, or a word, or sentence, upon parchment. He uses materials,
of course, paper, ink or pencil graphite. But in his ability to disintegrate
atomic combinations of matter, he can seize upon the material present, or even
at a distance, and "precipitate" or reintegrate it, in conformity
with the lines of his strong thought-energies. He can thus image a sentence,
word for word, in his mind, and then pour the current of atomic material into
the given form of the letters, upon the plane of the paper. The idiosyncrasies
of his own chirography would be carried through the mental process. K.H., we
are told, always used blue ink or blue pencil, while the epistles from M.
always came in red. Specimens of the two handwritings are given in the
frontispiece of the Mahatma Letters. The art of occult precipitation
appears still more marvelous when we are told by Madame Blavatsky that the
Adept did not attend to the actual precipitation himself but delegated it to one
of his distant chelas, who caught his Master's thought-forms in the Astral
Light and set them down by the chemical process which he had been taught to
employ. The Master thus needed only to think vividly the words of his
sentences, so as to impress them upon the mind of his pupil, and the latter did
the rest. This was explained by H.P.B. in an article, Lodges of Magic,
in Lucifer, Oct., 1888, while she was being accused of issuing false
messages from the Master.
156
"For it is hardly one out of one hundred 'Occult' letters that is ever
written by the hand of the Masters in whose names and on whose behalf they are
sent, as the Masters have neither need nor leisure to write them; and that when
a Master says: 'I wrote that letter,' it means only that every word in it was
dictated by him and impressed under his direct supervision. Generally they make
their chela . . . write (or precipitate) them. It depends entirely upon the
chela's state of development how accurately the ideas may be transmitted and
the writing model imitated. Thus the non-adept recipient is left in the dilemma
of uncertainty whether if one letter is false, all may not be."
For example, when a Mr. Henry Kiddle, an American lecturer on Spiritualism,
accused the writer of the Mahatma Letters of having plagiarized whole
passages from his lecture delivered at Mt. Pleasant, New York, in 1880, a year
prior to the publication of The Occult World, the Master K.H. explained
in a letter to Mr. Sinnett that the apparent forgery of words and ideas came about
through a bit of carelessness on his part in the precipitation of his ideas
through a chela. While dictating the letter to the latter, he had caught
himself "listening in" on Mr. Kiddle's address being delivered at the
moment in America; and as a consequence the chela took down portions of the
actual lecture as reflected from the mind of K.H.
Mr. Sinnett used the opportunity thus given him to draw from the Mahatma an
outline of a portion of the esoteric philosophy and science which was presumed
to be in his custody. The Master exhibited readiness to comply with Mr.
Sinnett's requests for information upon all vital and important matters.
Koot Hoomi tells Sinnett first that the world must prepare itself for the
manifestation of phenomenal elements in constantly augmenting volume and force.
The age of miracles, he says, is not past; it really never was. Plato was right
in asserting that ideas ruled the world; and as the human mind increases its
receptivity to larger ideas, the world will advance, revolutions will spring
from the spreading ferment, creeds and powers will crumble before their onward
march.
157
The duty set before intelligent people is to sweep away as much as possible of
the dross left by our pious forefathers to make ready for the apotheosis of
human life. The great new ideas
"touch man's true position in the universe, in relation to his previous
and future births; his origin and ultimate destiny; the relation of the mortal
to the immortal; of the temporary to the eternal; of the finite to the
infinite; ideas larger, grander, more comprehensive, recognizing the universal
reign of Immutable Law, unchanging and unchangeable in regard to which there is
only an Eternal Now, while to uninitiated mortals time is past or future as
related to their finite existence on this material speck of dirt. This is what
we study and what many have solved."5
Many old idols must be dethroned, chief of all being that of an
anthropomorphized Deity, with its train of debasing superstitions.
"And now," says K.H., "after making due allowance for evils that
are natural and that cannot be avoided . . . I will point out the greatest, the
chief cause of nearly two thirds of the evils that pursue humanity ever since
that cause became a power. It is religion, under whatever form and in whatever
nation. It is the sacerdotal caste, the priesthood and the churches; it is in
those illusions that man looks upon as sacred that he has to search out the
source of that multitude of evils which is the great curse of humanity and that
almost overwhelms mankind. Ignorance created gods and cunning took advantage of
the opportunity. Look at India and look at Christendom and Islam, at Judaism
and Fetichism. It is priestly imposture that rendered these Gods so terrible to
man; it is religion that makes of him the selfish bigot, the fanatic that hates
all mankind outside his own sect without rendering him any better or more moral
for it. It is belief in God and Gods that makes two-thirds of humanity the
slaves of a handful of those who deceive them under the false pretence of
saving them. . . . Remember the sum of human misery will never be diminished
unto that day when the better portion of humanity destroys in the name of
Truth, Morality and universal Charity the altars of their false Gods."6
______________
5 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 24.
6 Ibid., p. 57.
158
He goes on to clarify and delimit his position:
"Neither our philosophy nor ourselves believe in a God, least of all in
one whose pronoun necessitates a capital G. Our philosophy falls under the
definition of Hobbes. It is preëminently the science of effects by their causes
and of causes by their effects, and since it is also the science of things
deduced from first principle, as Bacon defines it, before we admit any such
principle we must know it, and have no right to admit even its possibility. . .
. Therefore we deny God both as philosophers and as Buddhists. We know there
are planetary and other spiritual lives, and we know there is in our system no
such thing as God, either personal or impersonal. Parabrahm is not a God, but
absolute immutable law, and Ishwar is the effect of Avidya (ignorance) and Maya
(illusion), ignorance based on the great delusion. The word 'God' was invented
to designate the unknown cause of those effects which man has ever admired or
dreaded without understanding them, and since we claim--and that we are able to
prove what we claim--i.e., the knowledge of that cause and causes, we
are in a position to maintain there is no God or Gods behind them."7
The causes assigned to phenomena by the Mahatmas, he says, are natural,
sensible, supernatural, unintelligible, and unknown. The God of the theologians
is simply an imaginary power, that has never yet manifested itself to human
perception. The cause posited by the Adept is that power whose activities we
behold in every phenomenon in the universe. They are pantheists, never
agnostics. The Deity they envisage is everywhere present, as well in matter as
elsewhere.
"In other words we believe in Matter alone, in matter as visible nature
and matter in its invisibility as the invisible omnipresent omnipotent Proteus
with its unceasing motion which is its life, and which nature draws from
herself, since she is the great whole outside of which nothing can exist. . . .
The existence of matter, then, is a fact; the existence of motion is another
fact, their self-existence and eternity or indestructibility is a third fact.
And the idea of pure Spirit as a Being or an Existence--give it whatever name
you will--is a chimera, a gigantic absurdity."8
______________
7 Ibid., p. 52.
8 Ibid., p. 56.
159
Furthermore, says K.H., your conceptions of an all-wise Cosmic Mind or Being
runs afoul of sound logic on another count. You claim, he says, that the life
and being of this God pervades and animates all the universe. But even your own
science predicates of the cosmic material ether that it, too, already permeates
all the ranges of being in nature. You are thus putting two distinct pervading
essences in the universe. You are postulating two primordial substances, two
basic elemental essences, where but one can be. Why posit an imaginary
substrate when you already have a concrete one? Find your God in the material
you are sure is there; do not forge a fiction and put it outside of real
existence to account for that existence. Why constitute a false God when you
have a real Universe?
There is an illimitable Force in the universe, but even this Force is not God,
since man may learn to bend it to his will. It is simply the visible and
objective expression of the absolute substance in its invisible and subjective
form.
From this strict and inexorable materialism K.H. seems to relent a moment when
he says to Mr. Hume:
"I do not protest at all, as you seem to think, against your theism, or a
belief in abstract ideal of some kind, but I cannot help asking you, how do you
or can you know that your God is all-wise, omnipotent and love-ful, when
everything in nature, physical and moral, proves such a being, if he does
exist, to be quite the reverse of all you say of him? Strange delusion and one
which seems to overpower your very intellect!"9
The intricate problem, then, of how the blind and unintelligent forces of
matter in motion do breed and have bred "highly intelligent beings like
ourselves" "is covered by the eternal progression of cycles, and the
process of evolution ever perfecting its work as it goes along."
Intelligence lies somehow in the womb of matter, and evolution brings it to
birth. Matter and spirit, we must constantly be reminded, are but the two polar
aspects of the One Substance.
The great philosophical problem of whether reality is monistic or pluralistic
finds clear statement and elucidation
______________
9 Ibid., p. 141.
160
in the Letters. It can be gathered from all the argument of K.H. that
primordial nature is a monism, but that when the hidden energy, or sheer
potentiality, of the unit principle deploys into action, or what the occultists
speak of as manifestation, it splits, first into a duality, or polarization,
and then into an infinity of modifications arising from varying intensities of
vibration and modes of combination. Through the spectacles of time and space we
see life as multiple; could we be freed from the limitations of our sensorium,
however, we could see life whole, as a single essence. Non-polarized force is,
in any terms of our apperceptive nature, an impossibility and a nonentity; pure
spirit is a sheer abstraction. Spirit must be changed into matter, to be seen.
It is a silly philosophy which would exalt spirit and debase matter, as many
ascetic or idealistic religious systems have done. Matter is the garment of
spirit, and needs but to be beautified and refined. Spirit is helpless without
it. "Bereaved of Prakriti, Purusha (Spirit) is unable to manifest itself,
hence ceases to exist--becomes nihil."10 Likewise Spirit is necessary to
the faintest stir of life in matter.
"Without Spirit or Force even that which Science styles as 'not-living'
matter, the so-called mineral ingredients which feed plants, could never have
been called into form."11
Form will vanish the moment spirit is withdrawn from it.
"Matter, force and motion are the trinity of physical objective nature, as
the trinitarian unity of spirit-matter is that of the spiritual or subjective
nature. Motion is eternal because spirit is eternal. But no modes of motion can
ever be conceived unless they are in conjunction with matter."12
"Unconscious and non-existing when separated, they become consciousness
and life when brought together,"13
says K.H. in reference to the two poles of being. If the spirit or force were
to fail, the electron would cease to swirl about
______________
10 Ibid., p. 142.
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid., p. 71.
161
the proton, the atom would collapse, the worlds would vanish. The world is an
illusion in the same way that the solid appearance of the revolving spokes of a
wheel is an illusion. Stop the swirl, and the universe not only collapses--it
goes out of manifestation.
A novel and startling corollary of the teaching that the forces of nature are
"blind unconscious" laws, is seen in the query of K.H. to Mr. Hume,
whether it had ever occurred to him that
"universal, like finite human mind, might have two attributes or a dual
power--one, the voluntary and conscious, and the other the involuntary and
unconscious, or the mechanical power. To reconcile the difficulty of many
theistic and anti-theistic propositions, both these powers are a philosophical
necessity. . . . Take the human mind in connection with the body. Man has two
distinct physical brains; the cerebrum . . . the source of the voluntary
nerves; and the cerebellum--the fountain of the involuntary nerves which are
the agents of the unconscious or mechanical powers of the mind to act through.
And weak and uncertain as may be the control of man over his involuntary, such
as the blood circulation, the throbbings of the heart and respiration,
especially during sleep--yet how far more powerful, how much more potential
appears man as master and ruler over the blind molecular motion . . . than that
which you will call God shows over the immutable laws of nature.
Contrary in that to the finite, the 'infinite mind' . . . exhibits but the
functions of its cerebellum."14
That Master admits that he is arguing the case for such a duality of cosmic
mental function only on the basis of the theory that the macrocosm is the
prototype of the microcosm, and that the high planetary spirits themselves have
no more concrete evidence of the operation of a "cosmic cerebrum" than
we have.
The Master has taken many pages to detail to Mr. Sinnett the information
relative to the evolution of the worlds from the nebular mist, and the outline
of the whole cosmogonic scheme. As this will be dealt with more fully in our
review of The Secret Doctrine, it need only be glanced at
______________
14 Ibid., p. 137.
162
here to give coherence to the material in the Letters. Force or spirit
descends into matter and creates or organizes the universes. Its immersion in
the mineral kingdom marks the lowest or grossest point of its descent, and from
there it begins to return to spirit, carrying matter up with it to
self-consciousness. Impulsions of life energy emanate from "the heart of
the universe" and go quivering through the various worlds, vivifying them
and bringing to each in turn its fitting grade of living organisms. Thus came
the races of men on our Earth, which is now harboring its Fifth great family,
the Aryan.
What is of great interest in the scheme of Theosophy is that
"At the beginning of each Round, when humanity reappears under quite
different conditions than those afforded by the birth of each new race and its
sub-races, a 'Planetary' has to mix with these primitive men, and to refresh
their memories and reveal to them the truths they knew during the preceding
Round. Hence the confused traditions about Jehovahs, Ormazds, Osirises, Brahms
and the tutti quanti. But that happens only for the benefit of the First Race.
It is the duty of the latter to choose the fit recipients among its sons, who
are 'set apart'--to use a Biblical phrase--as the vessels to contain the whole
stock of knowledge to be divided among the future races and generations until
the close of that Round. . . . Every race has its Adepts; and with every new
race we are allowed to give them as much of our knowledge as the men of that
race deserve. The last seventh race will have its Buddha, as every one of its
predecessors had."15
And then Koot Hoomi undertakes to meet the inevitable query: What comes out of
the immense machinery of the cycles and globes and rounds?
_______________
15 Ibid., p. 167. "En passant to show you that not only were
not the 'Races' invented by us, but that they are a cardinal dogma with the
Lama Buddhists, and with all who study our esoteric doctrines, I send you an
explanation on a page or two of Rhys Davids' Buddhism,--otherwise
incomprehensible, meaningless and absurd. It is written with the special
permission of the Chohan (my Master) and--for your benefit. No Orientalist has
ever suspected the truths contained in it, and--you are the first Western man
(outside Tibet) to whom it is now explained."--The Mahatma Letters,
p. 158.
163
"What emerges at the end of all things is not only 'pure and impersonal
spirit,' but the collected 'personal' remembrances" . . .16 The
individual, imperishable, will enjoy the fruits of its collective lives.
If the Mahatma's attempt to solve the eternal riddle of the "good" of
earthly life is not so complete and satisfactory as might have been wished, we
at least gather from this interesting passage that its ultimate meaning can be
ascertained only by our personal experience with every changing form and aspect
of life itself. We must taste of all the modes of existence. This inflicts upon
us the "cycle of necessity," the imperative obligation to tread the
weary wheel of life on all the globes. We will know the "good" of it
all only by living through it. There is no vindication for ethics, for religion,
for philosophy, for teleology and optimism, save in life and experience itself.
Reason, dialectic, can do nothing for us if life does not first furnish us the
material content of the good. All we can do is look to life with the confident
expectation that its processes will justify our wishes. We must in the end
stand on faith. If life prove not ultimately sweet to the tasting, no
rationalization will make it so.
We are assured, however, that the unit of personal consciousness built up in
the process of cosmic evolution is never annihilated, but expands until it
becomes inclusive of the highest. It enjoys the fruitage of its dull
incubations in the lower worlds in its ever-enhancing capacities for a life
"whose glory and splendor have no limits."
But, says K.H. immortality is quite a relative matter. Man, being a compound
creature, is not entirely immortal. You know, he reminds us, that the physical
body has no immortality. Neither the etheric double nor the kama rupa (astral
body), nor yet the lower manasic (mental) principle survive disintegration.
Only the Ego in the causal body holds its conscious existence between lives on
earth. Even the planetary spirits, high as they are in the scale of being,
suffer breaks in their conscious life,--the periods of pralaya. In the true
sense of the term only the one life has absolute
______________
16 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 158.
164
immortality, for it is the only existence which has neither beginning nor end,
nor any break in its continuity. All lower aspects and embodiments have
immortality, but with periodic recessions into inanition.
The problem of evil received treatment at K.H.'s hands, and is summarized in
the statement that
"Evil has no existence per se and is but the absence of good and exists
but for him who is made its victim. It proceeds from two causes, and no more
than good is it an independent cause in nature. Nature is destitute of goodness
or malice; she follows only immutable laws, when she either gives life and joy
or sends suffering and death and destroys what she has created. Nature has an
antidote for every poison and her laws a reward for every suffering. The
butterfly devoured by a bird becomes that bird, and the little bird killed by
an animal goes into a higher form. It is the blind law of necessity and the
eternal fitness of things, and hence cannot be called evil in Nature. The real
evil proceeds from human intelligence and its origin rests entirely with
reasoning man who dissociates himself from Nature. Humanity then alone is the
true source of evil. Evil is the exaggeration of good, the progeny of human
selfishness and greediness. Think profoundly and you will find that save
death--which is no evil but a necessary law, and accidents which will always
find their reward in a future life--the origin of every evil, whether small or
great, is in human action, in man whose intelligence makes him the one free
agent in Nature. It is not Nature that creates diseases, but man. . . . Food,
sexual relations, drink, are all natural necessities of life; yet excess in
them brings on disease, misery, suffering, mental and physical. . . . Become a
glutton, a debauchee, a tyrant, and you become the originator of diseases, of
human suffering and misery. Therefore it is neither Nature nor an imaginary
Deity that has to be blamed, but human nature made vile by selfishness."17
It will be of interest to hear what K.H. says about "heaven."
"It (Devachan)18 is an idealed paradise in each case, of the
______________
17 Ibid., p. 52.
18 Devachanna would be equivalent to the Sanskrit devachhanna,
hidden (abode) of the gods. On page 373 of the Mahatma Letters the
Master K.H. writes: "The meaning of the terms 'Devachan' and 'Deva-Loka,'
is identical; 'chan' and 'loka'
165
Ego's own making, and by him filled with the scenery, crowded with the
incidents and thronged with the people he would expect to find in such a sphere
of compassionate bliss."19
Man makes his own heaven or hell, and is in it while he is making it. It is
subjective; only, Theosophy postulates a certain (refined and sublimated)
objectivity to the forms of our subjectivity. Man does in heaven only what he
does on earth--forms a conception and then hypostatizes or reifies it. Only, in
the case of nirvanic states, the reification is instantaneously externalized.
On earth it is a slower formation. The "Summerland" of the
Spiritualists is but the objectification of the Ego's buoyant dreams, when
freed from the heavy limitations of the earth body.
"In Devachan the dreams of the objective life become the realities of the
subjective."20
This means that the ideal creations, the highest aspirations of man on earth,
become the substance of his actual consciousness in heaven. They are the only
elements of his normal human mind that are pitched at a vibration rate high
enough to impress the matter or stuff of his permanent body, and hence they
alone cause a repercussion or response in his pure subjective consciousness
when the lower bodies are lost. On this theory the day dreams and the ideal
longings of the human soul become the most vital and substantial, and abiding,
activities of his psychic life.
The only memories of the earth life that intrude into this picture of heavenly
bliss are those connected with the feelings of love and hate.
"Love and hatred are the only immortal feelings, the only survivors from
the wreck of the Ye-damma or phenomenal world."21
______________
equally signifying place or abode. Deva is a word too
indiscriminately used in Eastern writings, and is at times merely a
blind." Deva may be roughly translated as "the shining one" or
god. Devachan written alternatively Deva-Chan) is thus used to signify
"the abode of the gods." Theosophists interchange it with our term
"heaven-world."
19 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 179.
20 Ibid., p. 197.
21 Ibid., p. 187.
166
All other feelings function at too low a rate to register on the ethereal body
of the Devachanee, and are lost.
"Out of the resurrected past nothing remains but what the Ego has felt
spiritually--that was evolved by and through, and lived over by his spiritual
faculties--be it love or hatred."22
Suicides, says K.H., must undergo a peculiar discipline following their
premature death. Since they have arbitrarily interrupted a cycle of nature
before its normal completion, the operation of law requires that they hang
suspended, so to speak, in a condition of near-earthly existence until what
would have been their natural life-term has expired.
"The suicides who, foolishly hoping to escape life, found themselves still
alive, have suffering enough in store for them from that very life. Their
punishment is in the intensity of the latter."23
Their distress consists, it seems, in remaining within the purview of their
earthly life without being able to express its impulses. They are often tempted
to enjoy life again by proxy, i.e., through mediums or by efforts at a
sort of vampiristic obsession. Victims of death by accident have a happier
fate. They are more quickly released from earth's lure to partake of the lethal
existence in the higher Devachan.
All those souls who do not slip down into the eighth sphere--Avichi--through a
"pull" of the animal nature which proved too strong for their
spiritual fibre to resist, go on to the Devachan--to Heaven. To the Theosophist
heaven is not "that bourne from which no traveler e'er returns," nor
is access to it a matter of even rare exception. Millions of persons in earth
life have had glimpses through its portals, in sleep, trance, catalepsis,
anaesthesia, hypnosis, or in the open-eyed mystic's vision. It is a realm of
sweet surcease from pain and sorrow, of happiness without alloy. But it is far
from being the same place, or from providing identically the same experience,
for every soul. Each one's heaven is determined by the capacities for spiritual
enjoyment developed on earth. Only the spiritual senses survive.
______________
22 Ibid., p. 187.
23 Ibid., p. 183.
167
To enrich heaven one must have laid up spiritual treasure on earth.
Furthermore, the life there is not without break. The released Ego does not
loll away an eternal existence there, but after due rest returns to earth. Nor
is his enjoyment of the Devachan the same in each sojourn there. He bites
deeper into the bliss of heaven each time he takes his flight from body. The
constant enrichment of his experience in the upper spheres provides a
never-ending novelty.
To Mr. Sinnett's assertion that a mental condition of happiness empty of
sensational, emotional, and lower mental (manasic) content would be an
intolerable monotony K.H. replies by asking him if he felt any sense of
monotony during that one moment in his life when he experienced the utmost
fulness of conscious being. Devachan is like that, he assured the complainant,
only much more so. As our climatic moments in this life seem by their ineffable
opulence to swallow up the weary sense of the time-drag, so the ecstatic
consciousness of the heaven state is purged of all sense of ennui or successive
movement. To put it succinctly, there is no sense of time in which to grow
weary.
"No; there are no clocks, no timepieces in Devachan, . . . though the
whole Cosmos is a gigantic chronometer in one sense . . . I may also remind you
in this connection that time is something created entirely by ourselves;
that while one short second of intense agony may appear, even on earth, as an
eternity to one man, to another, more fortunate, hours, days and sometimes
whole years may seem to flit like one brief moment. . . . But finite similes
are unfit to express the abstract and the infinite; nor can the objective ever
mirror the subjective. . . . To realize the bliss in Devachan, or the woes in
Avitchi, you have to assimilate them--as we do. . . . Space and time may be, as
Kant has it, not the product but the regulators of the sensations, but only so far
as our sensations on earth are concerned, not those in Devachan. . . Space and
time cease to act as 'the frame of our experience' 'over there.'"24
The land of distinctions is transcended and the here and there merge into the
everywhere, as the everywhere into the here and there, and the now and then
into the now.
______________
24 Ibid., p. 194.
168
Koot Hoomi is sure that the materialistic attitudes of the Occidental mind have
played havoc with the subtle spirituality embodied in Eastern religions, in the
effort at translation and interpretation.
"Oh, ye Max Müllers and Monier Williamses, what have ye done with our
philosophy?"25
You can not take the higher spiritual degrees by mere study of books. Progress
here has to do largely with the development of latent powers and faculties, the
cultivation of which is attended with some dangers. In this juncture it avails
the student far more to be able to call upon the personal help of a kindly
guardian who is truly a Master of the hidden forces of life, than to depend
upon his own efforts, however consecrated. Each grade in the hierarchy of
evolved beings stands ready to tutor the members of the class below.
"The want of such a 'guide, philosopher and friend' can never be supplied,
try as you may. All you can do is to prepare the intellect: the impulse toward
'soul-culture must be furnished by the individual. Thrice fortunate they who
can break through the vicious circle of modern influence and come above the
vapors! . . . Unless regularly initiated and trained--concerning the spiritual
insight of things and the supposed revelations made unto man in all ages from
Socrates down to Swedenborg . . . no self-tutored seer or clairvoyant ever saw
or heard quite correctly."26
The Master Morya has a word to say to Sinnett about "the hankering of
occult students after phenomena" of a psychic nature. It is a maya27
against which, he says, they have always been warned. It grows with
gratification; the Spiritualists, he says, are thaumaturgic addicts. It adds no
force to metaphysical truth that his own and K.H.'s letters
______________
25 Ibid., p. 241
26 Ibid., p. 255.
27 Maya, a word frequent in several schools of Indian Philosophy,
commonly used to denote the illusory or merely phenomenal character of man's
experience which he gains through his sense equipment. It is often identified
with avidya or ajnana and contrasted with Brahmavidya or
knowledge of truth and reality, in their unconditioned form.
169
drop into Sinnett's lap or come under his pillow. If the philosophy is wrong a
"wonder" will not set it right. Spiritual knowledge, made effective
for growth, is the desideratum. Trance mediumship, he reiterates, is itself
both undesirable and unfruitful. No mind should submit itself passively to
another. "We do not require a passive mind, but on the contrary are
seeking for those most active." Nothing can give the student insight save
the unfolding of his own inner powers.
Much of the Adept's writing to Sinnett has to do with the conditions of
probation and "chelaship" in the master science of soul-culture. He
says there are certain rigid laws the fulfilment of which is absolutely
essential to the disciple's secure advancement. They have to do with
self-mastery, meditation, purity of life, fixity of purpose. These laws, which
at first seem to the neophyte to bar his path, will be seen, as he persists in
obedience to them, to be the road to all he can ask. But no one can break them
without becoming their victim. Too eager expectation on the part of the
aspirant is dangerous. It disturbs the balance of forces.
"Each warmer and quicker throb of the heart wears so much life away. The
passions, the affections, are not to be indulged in by him who seeks to know;
for they wear out the earthly body with their own secret power; and he who
would gain his aim must be cold."28
A hint as to the occult desirability of vegetarianism is dropped in the
sentence:
"Never will the Spiritualists find reliable trustworthy mediums and Seers
(not even to a degree) so long as the latter and their 'circle' will saturate
themselves with animal blood and the millions of infusoria of the fermented
fluids."29
Arcane knowledge has always been presented in forms such that only the most
determined aspirants could grasp the meanings. K.H. interjects that Sir Isaac
Newton understood the principles of occult philosophy but "withheld his
knowl-
______________
28 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 274.
29 Ibid., p. 276.
170
edge very prudently for his own reputation." The "scientific"
attitude of mind is declared to be unpropitious for the attainment of clear
insight into truth, and the pretensions of modern scientists that they
comprehend "the limits of the natural" receive some of the Master's
irony. "Oh, century of conceit and mental obscuration!" he jeers.
"All is secret for them as yet in nature. Of man--they know but the
skeleton and the form . . . their school science is a hotbed of doubts and
conjectures."30
Furthermore, "to give more knowledge to a man than he is fitted to receive
is a dangerous experiment." In his ignorance or his passion he may make a
use of it fatal both to himself and those about him. The Adepts, it appears
also, have their own reasons for not wishing to impart knowledge more rapidly
than the pupil can assimilate it. The misuse of knowledge by the pupil always
reacts upon the initiator; the Teacher becomes responsible in a measure for the
results. The Master would only hinder and complicate his own progress by
indiscreet generosity to his chela.
As one means of lightening this responsibility the chela is required, when
accepted, to take a vow of secrecy covering every order he may receive and the
specific information imparted. The Master knows whether the vow is ever broken,
without a question being put.
The prime qualification for the favor of receiving the great knowledge is
rectitude of motive. Wisdom must be sought only for its serviceability to
Brotherhood and progress, not even as an end in itself:
"The quality of wisdom ever was and will be yet for a long time--to the
very close of the fifth race--denied to him who seeks the wealth of the mind
for its own sake, and for its own enjoyment and result, without the secondary
purpose of turning it to account in the attainment of material
benefits."31
The applicant for chelaship is tested--unknown to himself--in subtle ways
before he is accepted, and often after-
______________
30 Ibid., p. 281.
31 Ibid., p. 305.
171
wards, too. It is not a system of secret espionage, but a method of drawing out
the inner nature of the neophytes, so that they may become self-conquerors.
K.H. reminds Sinnett that the efforts of theosophic adherents to restore or
propagate esoteric doctrines have ever been met by the determined opposition of
the vested ecclesiastical interests, which have not scrupled to resort to
forgery of documents, alleged confessions of fraud, or other villainous
subterfuge, to crush out the "heresy."
"Some of you Theosophists are now wounded only in your 'honor' or your
purses, but those who held the lamp in previous generations paid the penalty of
their lives for their knowledge."32
He points out, too, the distressful state into which certain over-eager
aspirants have brought themselves by "snatching at forbidden power before
their moral nature is developed to the point of fitness for its exercise."
He says: "it would be a sorry day for mankind" if any sharper or
deadlier powers--such as those the high Adepts are privileged to wield--were
put in the hands of those unaccustomed to use them, or morally untrustworthy.
K.H. volunteers to explain the occult significance of the interlaced black and
white triangles in the circle which forms part of the monogram on the seal of
the Theosophical Society. The Jewish Kabbalists viewed the insignia as
Solomon's Seal. It is "a geometrical synthesis of the whole occult
doctrine."
"The two interlaced triangles . . . contain the 'squaring of the circle,'
the 'philosophical stone,' the great problems of Life and Death, and--the
Mystery of Evil."33
The upward-pointing triangle is Wisdom concealed, and the downward-pointing one
is Wisdom revealed--in the phenomenal world.
"The circle indicates the bounding, circumscribing quality of the All, the
Universal Principle which expands . . . to embrace all things."
______________
32 Ibid., p. 322.
33 Ibid., p. 337
172
The three sides represent the three gunas, or finite attributes. The double
triangles likewise symbolize the Great Passive and the Great Active principles,
the male and female, Purusha (Spirit) and Prakriti (Matter).34 The one triangle
points upward to Spirit, the other downward to Matter, and their interlacing
represents the conjunction of Spirit and Matter in the manifested universe. The
six points of the two triangles, with the central point, yield the significant
Seven, the symbol of Universal Being.
Manifestation of the Absolute Life creates universes, and starts evolutionary
processes; but, says K.H. to Sinnett,
"neither you nor any other man across the threshold has had or ever will
have the 'complete theory' of Evolution taught him; or get it unless he guesses
it for himself. . . . Some--have come very near to it. But there is always . .
. just enough error . . . to prove the eternal law that only the unshackled
Spirit shall see the things of the Spirit without a veil."35
Pride of intellect grows enormously more dangerous the farther one goes toward
the higher realms; and after that is overcome spiritual pride raises its head.
An average mortal finds his share of sin and misery rather equally distributed
over his life; but a chela has it concentrated all within one period of
probation. One who essays the higher peaks of knowledge must overcome a heavier
drag of moral gravitation than one who is content to walk the plain.
From a purely political standpoint it is interesting to note that in 1883 K.H.
had taken hold of a project to launch in India a journal to be named "The
Phoenix," which, with Mr. Sinnett as editor, was to function as an agent
for the cultivation of native Hindu patriotism, of which the Master saw a sore
need in India's critical situation at that time. Native princes were looked to
for financial support, as well as Theosophists, and propaganda for the venture
had already been set in motion. But K.H. declares that his
______________
34 The terms Purusha and Prakriti are employed in the Sankhya
school of Indian philosophy to designate spirit and matter as the two opposing
phases of the one life when in active manifestation.
35 Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, p. 348.
173
closer inspection of the situation and his discovery of the wretched political
indifference of his countrymen made the enterprise dubious, financially and
spiritually. He then ordered Sinnett to drop it entirely, as he saw certain
failure ahead.
The Mahatma Letters, in the latter portion, go deeply into the affairs
of the London Lodge, T. S., which Mr. Sinnett had founded on his return to
England, and they even advise as to the "slate" of officers to stand
for election. There was a factional grouping in the Lodge at the time, the
Kingsford-Maitland party standing for Christian esotericism as against the
paramount influence of the Tibetan Masters, whose existence was regarded by
them as at least hypothetical; and the Sinnett wing adhering closely to H.P.B.
and her Adepts. Mrs. Anna B. Kingsford had had a series of communications in
her own right from high teachers, which K.H. himself stated were in accord with
his own doctrine. These were published in a volume, The Perfect Way. The
Master counsels harmony between the two parties, preaching, with Heraclitus,
that harmony is the equilibrium established by the tension of two opposing
forces.
Much or most of the substance of the later Letters is personal, touching
Sinnett's relations with persons of prominence in the Theosophical movement.
The Adepts make no claim to omniscience--they themselves are in turn disciples
of higher and grander beings whom they speak of as the Dhyan Chohans,36 and
whom they rank next to the "planetaries"--but they assert their
ability to look from any distance into the secret minds of Sinnett's associates
as well as into his own. They gave him the benefit of this spiritual
"shadowing" to guide him in the Society's affairs.
Many complimentary things are said to Mr. Sinnett for his encouragement; but he
is not spared personal criticism
______________
36 Of the Dhyan Chohans Madame Blavatsky speaks in the Glossary as
follows: "The Lords of Light," the highest gods, answering to the
Roman Catholic Archangels, the divine intelligences charged with the
supervision of Kosmos. Dhyan is a Sanskrit term signifying
"wisdom" or "illumination," but the name Chohans
seems to be more obscure in origin, and is probably Tibetan, used in the
general sense of "Lords" of "Masters."
174
of the sharpest sort. He is told that his attitude of Western pride stands in
the way of his true spiritual progress. While his admirable qualities have won
him the distinction of being used as a literary aid to the Mahatmas, still he
is pronounced far from eligible for chelaship.
Much of the material in the Letters, being of a quite personal and intimate
nature, was, to be sure, never intended for publication; in fact, was again and
again forbidden publication. But the Sinnett estate was persuaded, in 1925, to
give out the Letters for the good they might be expected to do in refutation of
the many bizarre divergencies which Neo-Theosophy was making from the original
teachings. Their publication came at the conclusion of the half-century period
of the existence of the Theosophical Society and was supposed to terminate an
old and begin a new cycle with some exceptional significance such as
Theosophists attribute to times and tides in the flow of things.
To most Theosophists the existence of the Masters and the contents of their
teaching form the very corner-stone of their systematic faith. And ultimately
they point to the wisdom and spirituality displayed in the Letters themselves
as being sufficient vindication of that faith.
175
CHAPTER VII
STORM, WRECK, AND REBUILDING
Reverting from philosophy to history we must now give some account of what
happened in India from the date the two Founders left America late in 1878.
India welcomed Theosophy with considerable warmth. Col. Olcott toured about,
founding Lodges rapidly, and Madame Blavatsky bent herself to the more esoteric
work of corresponding with her Masters and of establishing her official
mouthpiece, The Theosophist. Though Isis Unveiled had been put
forth in America, Theosophy was first really propagated in India.
The early history of the Society in India need not concern us here, save as it
had repercussions in the United States. But it is necessary to touch upon the
conspicuous events that transpired there in 1884-85, for they shook the
Theosophic movement to its foundations and for a time threatened to end it. We
refer to the official Reports issued in those two years by the Society for
Psychical Research in England upon the genuineness of the Theosophic
phenomena.1
The S.P.R., having been founded shortly before 1884 by prominent men interested
in the growing reports of spiritistic and psychic phenomena (the early
membership included at least three Theosophists, Prof. F. W. H. Myers, Mr. W.
Stainton Moses and Mr. C. C. Massey), manifested a pronounced interest in the
recently-published and widely-read works of Mr. Sinnett, The Occult World
and Esoteric Buddhism. Madame Blavatsky's Isis Unveiled and the
works and experiments of Prof. William Crookes had done much to foster this new
study. Accordingly when Col. Olcott and
______________
1 The official reports of the S.P.R. are to be found in Vol. III, pages 201 to
400 of the Proceedings of the S.P.R. A very adequate review of the
entire affair is made by William Kingsland in the text and appendix of his
recent work, The Real H. P. Blavatsky (M. Watkins, London, 1928).
Partial accounts are found in many other works, as for instance, The
Theosophical Movement.
176
Mohini M. Chatterji, a devoted follower of H.P.B., were in Europe in 1884, the
S.P.R. requested the three to sit for friendly questioning concerning Madame
Blavatsky's reported marvels. She was herself interrogated at this time. This
procedure led to the publication "for private and confidential use"
of the First Report of the Committee in the fall of 1884. In sum the Report
expressed decided incredulity as to the genuine nature of the phenomena.
Ascribing fraud only to Madame Blavatsky, it says:
"Now the evidence in our opinion renders it impossible to avoid one or
other of two alternative conclusions: Either that some of the phenomena
recorded are genuine, or that other persons than Madame Blavatsky, of good
standing in society, and with characters to lose, have taken part in deliberate
imposture."
The conclusion was:
"On the whole, however, (though with some serious reserves) it seems
undeniable that there is a prima facie case for some part at least of the claim
made, which . . . cannot, with consistency, be ignored."
Later in the same year the S.P.R. sent one of its members, Mr. Richard Hodgson,
a young University graduate, to India to conduct further investigation of the
phenomena reported to have taken place at the Headquarters of the Theosophical
Society, at Madras. He was given untrammeled access to the premises and
permitted to examine in person members of the household who had witnessed some
of the events in question.
H.P.B.'s nemesis in these ill-started proceedings was one Madame Coulomb. In
1871, when Madame Blavatsky had been brought to Cairo, along with other
survivors of their wrecked vessel, the French woman, a claimant to the possession
of mediumistic powers, became interested in H.P.B.'s psychic abilities and
rendered her some assistance. When, in 1879, the Founders arrived in India,
Madame Coulomb in her turn resorted to her Russian friend for aid, and H.P.B.
made her the housekeeper, and her husband the
177
general utility man, of the little Theosophic colony. They proved to be
ungrateful, meddlesome, and unscrupulous, became jealous and discontented, and
when left in charge of Madame Blavatsky's own rooms in the building during her
absence on the journey to Europe in 1884, they fell into bickering and open
conflict with Mr. Lane-Fox, Dr. Franz Hartmann and others of the personnel over
questions of authority and small matters of household management. Both they and
the Theosophists took up the matters of dispute by letter with H.P.B. and Col.
Olcott in Europe, and the two leaders urged conciliation and peace on both
sides. But finally the ill-repressed resentment of Madame Coulomb broke out
into secret machinations with the Christian missionaries to expose Madame
Blavatsky as a fraud. Madame Coulomb placed in the hands of the missionaries
letters allegedly written to her by her former friend, in which evidence of the
latter's connivance with her French protégé to perpetrate deception in
phenomena was revealed. Just before exploding this bombshell the Coulombs had
become unendurable, and had finally been compelled to leave the premises.
Madame Coulomb bartered her incriminating material to the missionaries for a
considerable sum of money, and the purchasers spread the alleged exposure
before the public in their organ, the Christian College Magazine.2
Madame Blavatsky, in Europe, made brief replies in the London Times and
the Pall Mall Gazette, stating that the Coulomb letters were forgeries.
She wished to bring recrimination proceedings against her accusers to vindicate
herself and the Society. Friends dissuaded her, or deserted her, and nothing
was done. But the Founders prepared to hasten back to India. Col. Olcott seems
to have taken a vacillating course, and the resolution adopted at a Convention
held in India upon their return expressed the opinion of the delegates that
Madame Blavatsky should take no legal action.
______________
2 It was from some three hundred native students of this same Christian College
that Madame Blavatsky received a welcoming ovation on her return from Paris to
India, and was given a testimonial of their assured faith in her lofty motives.
178
She resigned her office as Corresponding Secretary, but later was requested to
resume her old place.
Mr. Hodgson submitted his report, which was published near the end of 1885.3 He
had not witnessed any phenomena nor examined any. He questioned witnesses to
several of the wonders a full year after the latter had taken place. He
rendered an entirely ex parte judgment in that he acted as judge,
accuser, and jury and gave no hearing to the defense. He ignored a mass of
testimony of the witnesses to the phenomena, and accepted the words of the
Coulombs whose conduct had already put them under suspicion.4 The merits of the
entire case have been carefully gone into by William Kingsland in his The
Real H. P. Blavatsky, and by the anonymous authors of The Theosophical
Movement. The matter of most decisive weight in Mr. Hodgson's unfavorable
judgment was the secret panel in H.P.B.'s "shrine" or cabinet built
in the wall of her room, and a sliding door exhibited by the Coulombs to the
investigators, and described as having been used by Madame Blavatsky for the insertion
of alleged Mahatma letters from the next room by one of the Coulomb
accomplices. The Theosophists resident at Headquarters charged that the secret
window had been built in, at the instigation of the missionaries, by M. Coulomb
during H.P.B.'s absence. He alone had the keys to Madame's apartment, and one
of the points of his quarrel with the house members was the possession of the
keys. He refused to give them up, alleging that Madame Blavatsky had placed him
in exclusive charge of her rooms during her absence. The charges of course
threw doubt upon the existence of the Masters, the genuineness of their
purported letters and the whole Mahatmic foundation of Theosophy.
______________
3 In The Proceedings of the S.P.R., Vol. III, pp. 201 to 400.
4 Further distrust of the Coulomb's charges against H.P.B. is justifiable in
view of the statement given on June 5, 1879 by Madame Coulomb to the Ceylon Times,
of which she sent the subject of her remarks a copy. She wrote: "I have
known this lady for the last eight years and I must say the truth that there is
nothing against her character. We lived in the same town, and on the contrary
she was considered one of the cleverest ladies of the age. Madame Blavatsky is
a musician, a painter, a linguist, an author, and I may say that very few
ladies and indeed few gentlemen, have a knowledge of things as general as
Madame Blavatsky."
179
A great point at issue was the comparison of H.P.B.'s handwriting with that of
the Mahatma Letters. Two experts, Mr. F. G. Netherclift and Mr. Sims, first
testified they were not identical, but later reversed their testimony. Mr. F.
W. H. Myers confessed there was entire similarity between the handwriting of
the Mahatma Letters and a letter received by Madame Blavatsky's aunt, Madame
Fadeef, back in 1870 at Odessa, Russia, from the hand of a Hindu personage who
then vanished from before her eyes. (Madame Blavatsky was at some other quarter
of the globe at the time.) A distinguished German handwriting expert later
declared there was no similarity between H.P.B.'s chirography and those of the
Master M. and K.H.
It remained for Mr. Hodgson to assign an adequate motive for Madame Blavatsky's
colossal career of deception, and here he confesses difficulty. He finally
concludes that her motive was patriotism for her native land: she was a Russian
spy! Mr. Solovyoff, in his A Modern Priestess of Isis, gives some
substance to this charge. It is conceivable that Madame Blavatsky could have
felt sentimental interest in the Russianizing, rather than the Anglicizing, of
India; yet it appears preposterous to think that she would have endured the
privations and hardships to which she was subjected in her devotion to
Theosophy merely to cloak a subterranean machination for Russian dominance in
India. She was an American citizen, having been naturalized before she left the
United States.
Mr. Hodgson declared Madame Blavatsky to be "one of the most accomplished,
ingenious and interesting impostors in history." In a letter to Sinnett,
June 21, 1885, she records her reciprocal opinion of Mr. Hodgson. She writes:
"They very nearly succeeded [in killing both her and the Theosophical
Society]. At any rate they have succeeded in fooling Hume and the S.P.R. Poor
Myers! and still more, poor Hodgson! How terribly they will be laughed at some
day!"
The attack of the S.P.R. upon Theosophy and its leaders fell with great force
upon the followers of the movement
180
everywhere and only a few remained loyal through the storm.
Among the faithful in America was Mr. W. Q. Judge. It remained for him to
effect a reorganization of the forces in the United States in 1885, when the
S.P.R. attack was raging abroad. In the previous year he had gone to France,
had met H.P.B., continued on to India and back to America. In 1885 he reorganized
the sparse membership into the Aryan Lodge. In 1886 he started the publication
of The Path, long the American organ for his expression of Theosophy.
Active study and propaganda followed quickly thereupon and the number of
branches soon tripled. Col. Olcott had appointed an American Board of Control.
This body met at Cincinnati in 1886 and organized "The American Section of
the Theosophical Society." In April, 1887, the branches held their first
Convention, and adopted constitution and by-laws. Mr. Judge became General
Secretary. The organization was a copy of that of the Federal Government,
though allegiance was subscribed to the General Council in India. In 1888 the
second Convention was held, with Mr. Archibald Keightley present as a
representative from England. Theosophical organization was at last in full
swing in America.
Brief mention may be made at this point of a somewhat divergent movement within
the ranks of Theosophy itself about 1886. A Mr. W. T. Brown, of Glasgow, had
had close fellowship with the Theosophists at Adyar, Madras, from 1884 to 1886.
He then came to this country and associated himself with Mrs. Josephine W.
Cables, who had been a Christian Spiritualist, but who had as early as 1882
organized the Rochester Theosophical Society. This was the first Theosophical
Lodge established in America after the original founding in New York in 1875.
But Mrs. Cables tried to represent Theosophy as a mixture of Christianity,
Spiritualism, Mysticism, personal ideas on diet and occultism in general. She
founded The Occult World, a magazine which Prof. Elliott Coues, then
President of the American Board of Control, tried to make the official organ of
Theosophy in
181
America. But Mr. Judge's Path was in the field, and Mrs. Cables and Mr.
Brown gave expression to some jealousy of the rival publication, alleging that
the Theosophical Society was not a unique instrument for the spreading of
occult knowledge, but that Christ was to be accepted as the final guide and
authority. They referred to the Theosophic teaching as "husks," while
Christ had fed the world the real kernel. To this H.P.B. replied through The
Path for December, 1886, and cast the blame for their losing touch with her
Masters on Mrs. Cables and Mr. Brown themselves.5 Mrs. Cables turned her Rochester
Theosophical Society into the "Rochester Brotherhood" and her
magazine into an exponent of Mystical Spiritualism. Mr. Brown returned to the
fold of orthodox Christianity. Prof. Coues was destined to contribute a
sensational chapter to Theosophic history before he broke with the movement
forever.6
A close study of the record will reveal that it was during these years that the
germ of a hierarchical division in the Theosophical organization developed. In
the theory of the existence and evolutionary attainments of the Masters
themselves was enfolded the conception of a graded approach to their elevated
status. As the Theosophical Society came to be understood as only an appanage
of the Masters in their service of humanity, its inner intent was soon seen to
be that of affording a means of access to these high beings. It was recognized
as an organization whose supreme headship was vested in the Mahatmas and whose
corporate membership formed a lower degree of spiritual discipleship. This
hierarchical grading naturally fell into three degrees, predicated on the
thesis that the Adepts accept pupils for personal tutelage. There were first,
the Masters, then their accepted pupils or chelas, and lastly just plain
Theosophists or mem-
______________
5 It is in this article that Madame Blavatsky gives out that important
declaration of hers, that as soon as the sincere aspirant steps upon the Path
leading to the higher initiations, his accumulated Karma is thrown upon him, in
condensed form. The determination to pursue the occult life is therefore often
spoken of as involving the "challenging of one's Karma."
6 He was the instigator of the "Sun Libel Case," which will be
outlined in Chapter XII.
182
bers of the Society. The third class might or might not be led to aspire to
chelaship, on the terms of a serious pledge to consecrate all life's efforts to
spiritual mastery. These three divisions came to be called the First, Second
and Third Sections of the Theosophical Society. It is the theory advanced in
the Theosophic Movement that H.P.B. represented the First Section, Mr.
Judge the Second and Col. Olcott the Third. The Russian noblewoman was regarded
as the only bona fide or authoritative link of communication with the First
Section (though the Masters might at any time grant the favor of their special
interest to others, as they did to Mr. Sinnett); Judge was held to be an
accepted chela, in the high confidence of Madame Blavatsky and her mentors,
their reliable agent to head the order of lay chelaship; Col. Olcott was the
active and visible head of the Theosophical Society, the accepted instrument of
the Masters in the work of building up that organization which was to present
the ancient doctrine of their existence to the world and mark out anew the path
of approach to them. H.P.B. and Judge worked behind the scenes, while Olcott
stood in the gaze of the world. To them belonged the task of bringing out the
teaching and keeping it properly related to its sources; to him fell the
executive labor of providing ways and means to serve it to a sceptical public.
The functions of the former two were esoteric; those of Olcott exoteric. It was
understood that the Colonel was not advanced beyond the position of a lay or
probationary chela. He himself seems to have accepted this ranking as deserved,
and generously admitted that
"to transform a worldly man such as I was in 1874--a man of clubs,
drinking parties, mistresses, a man absorbed in all sorts of worldly, public,
and private undertakings and speculations--into that purest, wisest, noblest,
and most spiritual of human beings--a 'Brother,' was a wonder demanding next to
miraculous efficacy. . . . No one knows until he really tries it, how awful a
task it is to subdue all his evil passions and animal instincts and
develop his higher nature."7
The Theosophical Movement ascribes most of the trials and
______________
7 The Theosophical Movement, p. 132.
183
tribulations of Theosophy to the Colonel's indifferent success, at times, in
the "awful task." Years later, Olcott says:
"She was the teacher, I the pupil; she the misunderstood and insulted
messenger of the Great Ones, I the practical brain to plan, the right hand to
work out the practical details."8
Out of this situation eventuated the formation of the Esoteric Section of the
Theosophical Society. So many members were reaching out after the chelaship
that Judge wrote to H.P.B. in 1887 for advice as to what to offer them. She
replied, telling him to go ahead in America and she would soon do something
herself. She then began the publication of Lucifer, in which the
qualifications, dangers, obstacles, and status of chelaship were set forth in
article after article. Judge went to London; and there, at the request of
Madame Blavatsky drew the plans and wrote the rules for the guidance of the new
body. Col. Olcott looked on with some perturbation while his spiritual
superiors stepped lightly over his authority to inaugurate the higher
enterprise. In October, 1888, the first public statement relative to the
Esoteric Section appeared. It announced the purpose of the formation of the
Esoteric Section to be:
"To promote the esoteric interests of the Theosophical Society by the
deeper study of esoteric philosophy."
All authority was vested in Madame Blavatsky and official connection with the
Theosophical Society itself was disclaimed.
A further hint as to the impelling motive back of the new branch of activity
was given by H.P.B. in the letter she addressed to the Convention of the
American Section meeting in April, 1889. She says:
"Therefore it is that the ethics of Theosophy are even more necessary to
mankind than the specific aspects of the psychic facts of nature and man . .
."
She made a plea for solidarity in the fellowship of the Theosophical Society,
to form a nucleus of true Brotherhood.
______________
8 Old Diary Leaves, Vol. IV.
184
Unity had to be achieved to withstand exterior onslaught, as well as interior
discord. An attack upon one must be equally met by all. The first object of the
Society is Universal Brotherhood. She asked in the finale:
"How many of you have helped humanity to carry its smallest burden, that
you should all regard yourselves as Theosophists? Oh, men of the West, who
would play at being the Saviors of mankind before they can spare the life of a mosquito
whose sting threatens them! Would ye be partakers of Divine Wisdom or true
Theosophists? Then do as the gods when incarnated do. Feel yourselves the
vehicles of the whole humanity, mankind as part of yourselves, and act
accordingly . . ."
She then sent out a formal letter, marked strictly private and confidential, to
all applicants for entry into the new school. It contained an introductory
statement, the "Rules of the Esoteric Section (Probationary) of the
Theosophical Society" and the "Pledge of Probationers in the Esoteric
Section." The latter was as follows:
"I pledge myself to support, before the world, the Theosophical Movement,
its leaders and its members; and in particular to obey, without cavil or delay,
the orders of the Head of the Section, in all that concerns my relation with
the Theosophical Movement."
It can be seen that such a pledge carried the possibility of far-reaching
consequences and might be difficult to fulfil under certain precarious
conditions. Much controversy in the Society from 1906 onwards hinges about this
pledge.
Madame Blavatsky went on to say:
"It is through an Esoteric Section alone . . . that the great exoteric
Society may be redeemed and made to realize that in union and harmony alone lie
its strength and power. The object of the Section, then, is to help the future
growth of the Theosophical Society as a whole in the true direction, by
promoting brotherly union at least among a choice minority."
The Book of Rules provided that the work to be pursued was not practical
occultism, but mutual help in the Theosophic life; it outlined measures for
suppressing gossip, slander, cant, hypocrisy, and injustice; for limiting the
claims
185
of occult interests and psychic inclinations; it inculcated the widest charity,
tolerance, and mutual helpfulness as the prime condition of all true progress.
Said the Rule:
"The first test of true apprenticeship is devotion to the interest of
another."
It concludes:
"It is not the individual or determined purpose of attaining oneself
Nirvana, which is, after all, only an exalted and glorious selfishness,
but the self-sacrificing pursuit of the best means to lead our neighbor on the
right path . . ."
Conditions for membership in the Esoteric Section were three: (1) one must be a
Fellow of the Theosophical Society; (2) the pledge must be signed; (3) the
applicant must be approved by the Head of the Section. And warning was issued
that, while no duties would be required in the Order that would interfere with
one's family or professional obligations, "it is certain that every member
of the Esoteric Section will have to give up more than one personal habit . . .
and adopt some few ascetic rules." The habits referred to were alcoholism
and meat-eating, mainly, and the ascetic rules were those regulating
meditation, sleep, diet, kindly speech, altruistic thought, etc.
The establishment of the Esoteric Section was one of the moves undertaken to
rebuild the structure of Theosophy which had been so badly shattered by the
S.P.R. attack and its consequences. But while this was going forward, largely
under the direction of Judge, Madame Blavatsky had already begun to devote her
tireless energies to the accomplishment of another great work of
reconstruction. Its inception bore a logical relation to the promulgation of
the Esoteric branch. If students were to be taken deeper into the essentials of
the occult life, there was need of a fuller statement of the scheme of the
world's racial and cosmogonic history, so that the task of personal and social development
might be seen and understood in its most intimate rapport with the larger
streams of life. The arcane knowledge had to be further unveiled.
186
The combined attack of the Coulombs, the Christian missionaries and the English
Psychic Research Society on Madame Blavatsky in 1885 was indeed a fiery-furnace
test. She had vigorously, in Isis and elsewhere, attacked orthodoxy and
conservative interests in religion and science. She was now to feel the full
force of the blow which society, through the representatives of these vested
interests, was impelled to strike back at her, and it was greater than she had
anticipated. It nearly ended her career. Not that she was one to cringe and
wince under attack. Far from it. She wanted to bring suit against her
calumniators. She burned under a sense of injustice. She even contemplated the
possibility of startling a crowded court room with a display of her suspected
phenomena. But--the trial would have necessitated dragging her beloved Masters
into the mire of low human emotions, and this she could not do. Instead, the
storm within her soul had to wear itself out by degrees. It nearly cost her
life itself; but she was saved, as has been maintained, by the intervention of
her Master's power. She wished to die, feeling that her life work was
irreparably defeated. At this juncture she was summoned, as we gather from her
letters to the Sinnetts, to a quiet nook north of Darjeeling, met the Mahatmas
in person, and returned after a few days to her friends, "fixed" once
more. Whatever the "inside" facts in the case, she went north broken
in body and spirit, and two days later emerged from her retirement apparently
well, and with a new zest for life, ready to battle again for her
"Cause."
Not long thereafter came the journey from India, which she was never to see
again, back to Europe, where she spent more peaceful days of work among devoted
friends, the Gebhards at Würzburg, Germany, the Countess Wachtmeister, the
Keightleys, and many more in Belgium, France, and England. She said the secret
of her new lease on life at this time was that the Master had indicated to her
that he wished her to perform one more service in the interests of Theosophy
before she relinquished the body. Her task was not finished. Isis was
little more than a clearing away
187
of old rubbish and the announcement that a great secret science lay buried amid
the ruins of ancient cities. The Mahatma Letters gave but a fragmentary
outline of the great Teaching, enough to stimulate inquiry in the proper direction.
But the magnum opus, the fundamentals of the Secret Doctrine, had not
yet been produced. The "Secret Doctrine" was still secret. Restored
to comparative health, and given certain reassurances of support from her
Masters, her courage we renewed. One finds the motive of vindication running
strong in her mind at this time; all thought of defence, of retaliation given
up, she would disprove all the charges of knavery, deception and
disingenuousness of every stripe by a master-work before whose brilliance all
suggestion of petty human motives would vanish. She writes in a letter to
Sinnett:
"As for [the charges of] philosophy and doctrine invented, the Secret
Doctrine shall show. Now I am here alone, with the Countess [Wachtmeister]
for witness. I have no books, no one to help me. And I tell you that the Secret
Doctrine will be twenty times as learned, philosophical and better than Isis,
which will be killed by it. Now there are hundreds of things which I am
permitted to say and explain. I will show what a Russian spy can do, an
alleged forger-plagiarist, etc. The whole doctrine is shown to be the mother
stone, the foundation of all the religions including Christianity, and on the
strength of exoteric published Hindu books, with their symbols explained
esoterically. The extreme lucidity of 'Esoteric Buddhism' [Mr. Sinnett's book
expounding the summarized teaching of the Mahatma Letters] will also be
shown, and its doctrines proven correct, mathematically, geometrically,
logically and scientifically. Hodgson is very clever, but he is not clever
enough for truth, and it shall triumph, after which I can die
peacefully."9
The work was intended in its first conception to be an "expansion of Isis."
It was soon seen, however, that the fuller clarification of the hints in the
earlier work would necessitate the practically complete unveiling of the whole
occult knowledge. So Isis was forgotten, and the new production made to
stand on its own feet.
______________
9 Found in the Appendix to The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett, pp.
480-481.
188
The hint in her letter just quoted that she would do the actual writing of the
new volumes practically without the aid of reference or source books is to be
taken to mean, doubtless, that the very manner of her production of the work
would constitute the final irrefutable proof of the existence and powers of the
Mahatmas. The composition as well as the contents of the book was to be
phenomenal. She says in a letter to Madame Jelihowsky, her sister, written at
this time that "it is the phenomena of Isis all over again."
Yet there were some variations. In a Sinnett letter she writes:
"There's a new development and scenery every morning. I live two lives
again! Master finds that it is too difficult for me to be looking
consciously into the astral light for my Secret Doctrine, and so, it is now
about a fortnight, I am made to see all I have to as though in my dream. I see
large and long rolls of paper on which things are written, and I recollect
them. Thus all the Patriarchs from Adam to Noah were given me to see, parallel
with the Rishis; and in the middle between them the meaning of these symbols or
personifications. I was ordered to . . . make a rapid sketch of what was known
historically and in literature, in classics and in profane and sacred
histories--during the five hundred years that followed it; of magic, the
existence of a universal Secret Doctrine known to the philosophers and
Initiates of every country, and even to several of the Church Fathers such as
Clement of Alexandria, Origen and others, who had been initiated themselves.
Also to describe the Mysteries and some rites; and I can assure you that the
most extraordinary things are given out now, the whole story of the
Crucifixion, etc., being shown to be based on a rite as old as the world--the
Crucifixion of the Lathe of the Candidate--trials, going down to Hell, etc.,
all Aryan . . . I have facts for twenty volumes like Isis; it is the language,
the cleverness for compiling them, that I lack."10
Writing to her niece, Madame Vera Johnston, she said:
"You are very green if you think that I actually know and understand all
the things I write. How many times am I to repeat
______________
10 Letters of H. P. Blavatsky to A. P. Sinnett (New York: Frederick A.
Stokes Co.), p. 194.
189
to you and your mother that the things I write are dictated to me; that
sometimes I see manuscripts, numbers and words before my eyes of which I never
knew anything?"11
In a letter to Judge in America, March 24, 1886, H.P.B. says:
"Such facts, such facts, Judge, as Masters are giving out, will
rejoice your old heart. . . . The thing is becoming enormous, a wealth of
facts."
Madame Johnston quotes Franz Hartmann, who accompanied Madame Blavatsky on her
trip from Madras to Europe in April, 1885, when she was so ill that she had to
be hoisted aboard, as saying that
"while on board the S.S. 'Tibre' and on the open sea, she very frequently
received in some occult manner many pages of manuscript referring to the Secret
Doctrine, the material of which she was collecting at the time. Miss Mary Flynn
was with us, and knows more about it than I; because I did not take much
interest in those matters, as the receiving of 'occult correspondence' had
become almost an everyday occurrence with us."12
The person who had most continuous and prolonged opportunity to witness
whatever display of extraordinary assistance was afforded the compiler of The
Secret Doctrine was the Countess Constance Wachtmeister, already mentioned
as being the companion and guardian of Madame Blavatsky during must of the
period of the composition at Würzburg, Ostend, and in London. In her Reminiscences
of H. P. Blavatsky, and The Secret Doctrine she writes in detail of the
many facts coming under her observation which pointed to exterior help in the
work. She wrote:
"The Secret Doctrine will be indeed a great and grand work. I have had the
privilege of watching its progress, of reading the manuscripts, and witnessing
the occult way in which she derived her information."
The Countess states that on two or three occasions she saw on H.P.B.'s desk in
the morning numbers of sheets of manu-
______________
11 The Path, Vol. IX, p. 300.
12 Ibid., p. 266.
190
script in the familiar handwriting of the Masters. She writes that at times a
piece of paper was found on the desk in the morning with unfamiliar characters
traced in red ink. It was an outline of the author's work for the day,--the
"red and blue spook-like messages." Questioned how it was
precipitated, H.P.B. stated that elementals were used for the purpose, but that
they had nothing to do with the intelligence of the message, only with the
mechanics of the feat.
More significant, perhaps, than these details is the question of the origin of
the many quotations and references, as in Isis, from old works, or from
books not in her possession. The testimony on this score is more voluminous and
challenging than in the case of Isis. 13
Madame Blavatsky was practically without reference books and was too ill to
leave the house to visit libraries. She worked from morning until night at her
desk. Dr. Hübbe-Schleiden, her German convert, says she had scarcely
half-a-dozen books. Her niece writes:
"Later on when we three went to Ostend [in the very midst of the work], it
was I who put aunt's things and books in order, so I can testify that the first
month or two in Ostend she decidedly had no other books but a few French
novels, bought at railway stations and read whilst traveling, and several odd
numbers of some Russian newspapers and magazines. So there was absolutely
nothing where her numerous quotations could have come from."14
Two young Englishmen, Dr. Bertram Keightley and his nephew Archibald, worked
with Madame Blavatsky on the arrangement of her material. It fell to them
eventually to edit the work for her. They contribute their testimony as to what
took place of a phenomenal sort. Says Bertram:
"Of phenomena in connection with The Secret Doctrine I have very little
indeed to say. Quotations, with full references, from
______________
13 The Countess Wachtmeister herself went to the pains of verifying a quotation
already written out by Madame Blavatsky, which the latter said would be found
in a volume in the Bodleian Library. She found the excerpt to be correct as to
wording, page, chapter, and title of the book quoted. She adds that Miss Emily
Kislingbury, a devoted member of the Society, verified a quotation from
Cardinal Weisman's Lectures on Science and Religion.
14 Reminiscences of H. P. Blavatsky and The Secret Doctrine, Appendix,
p. 105 ff.
191
books which were never in the house--quotations verified after hours of search,
sometimes at the British Museum, for a rare book--of such I saw and verified
not a few."15
The nephew speaks to the same effect. As a matter of fact, during the writing
of the latter portions of the book in London, Madame Blavatsky kept two or
three young men, students from the University of Dublin, busily engaged in the
daily search for quotations, which she said would be found in books of which
she gave not only the titles, but the exact location of the passages. These men
have repeatedly borne testimony to the facts in this connection. They were Mr.
E. Douglass Fawcett, Mr. S. L. McGregor Mathers, Mr. Edgar Saltus, and one or
two more.16
There were frequent and notable visitors in the evenings, when the day's
writing was put aside. Mr. Archibald Keightley tells that:
"Mr. J. G. Romanes, a Fellow of the Royal Society, comes in to discuss the
evolutionary theory set forth in her Secret Doctrine. Mr. W. T. Stead, Editor
of the Pall Mall Gazette, who is a great admirer of The Secret Doctrine,
finds much in it that seems to invite further elucidation. Lord Crawford, Earl
of Crawford and Balcarres, another F.R.S.--who is deeply interested in
occultism and cosmography, and who was a pupil of Lord Lytton and studied with
him in Egypt--comes to speak of his special subject of concern. Mr. Sidney
Whitman, widely known for his scathing criti-
______________
15 Ibid., Appendix, p. 89 ff.
16 The experience of Mr. C. Carter Blake, a scientist is pertinent on this
point. He asserts that her learning was extraordinary, in consideration of her
lack of early education and her want of books. He testifies that she knew more
than he did on his own lines of anthropology, specifying her abstruse knowledge
on the subject of the Naulette jaw. He says: "Page 744 in the Second
Volume of the Secret Doctrine refers to facts which she could not easily have
gathered from any published book." She had declared that the raised beaches
of Tarija were pliocene, when Blake argued that they were pleistocene. She was
afterwards proved correct. On page 755 of Vol. II, she mentions the fossil
footprints at Carson, Indiana. Says Blake: "When Madame Blavatsky spoke to
me of the footprints I did not know of their existence, and Mr. G. W. Bloxam,
Assistant Secretary of the Anthropological Institute, afterwards told me that a
pamphlet on the subject in the library had never been out. Madame Blavatsky
certainly had sources of information (I don't say what) transcending the
knowledge of experts on their own lines."--Reminiscences of H. P.
Blavatsky and The Secret Doctrine, Appendix, pp. 117 ff.
192
cism upon English cant, has ideas to express and thoughts to interchange upon
the ethics of Theosophy; and so they come."17
Untiringly through 1885, 1886 and 1887, in Germany with the Gebhards, then in
Belgium and finally in London, she labored to get the voluminous material in
form. Unable on account of her dropsical condition to take exercise, she was
again and again threatened with complete breakdown by the accumulation of
toxins in her system. A young physician of London, Dr. Bennett, who attended
her at times, pronounced her condition most grave, on one occasion declaring it
impossible for her to survive the night. In our third chapter we have seen
Countess Wachtmeister's account of her surprising recovery. The Countess
alleges that Madame destroyed many pages of manuscript already written, in
obedience to orders from the Master. There was left, however, enough material
for some sixteen hundred close-printed pages which now make up the two volumes
commonly accepted as her genuine product. To an examination of the contents of
this pretentious work we now invite the reader.
______________
17 Reminiscences of H. P. Blavatsky and The Secret Doctrine, Appendix,
pp. 96 ff.
193
CHAPTER VIII
THE SECRET DOCTRINE
The Secret Doctrine sets forth what purports to be the root knowledge
out of which all religion, philosophy, and science have grown. The sub-title--"The
Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy" reveals the daring aim and
scope of the undertaking. It is an effort to present and align certain
fundamental principles in such a way as to render possible a synthesis of all
knowledge.
The first volume deals with cosmogenesis, the second with anthropogenesis. A
third, to deal with the lives of the great occultists down the ages, was in
form for the press, as testified to by the Keightleys, who typed the
manuscript, and by Alice L. Cleather and others, but never came to the public.
A fourth was projected and almost entirely written, but likewise went to
oblivion instead of to the printer. A third volume, issued five years after
H.P.B.'s death under the editorship of Mrs. Annie Besant, is made up of some
other writings of Madame Blavatsky, dealing in part with the Esoteric Section,
but is not regarded by close students as having been the original third volume.
The whole book professes to be a commentary on The Stanzas of Dzyan,1
which H.P.B. alleged to be a fragment of Tibetan sacred writings of two types,
one cosmological, the other ethical and devotional. The Secret Doctrine elucidates
the former section of the Stanzas, and her later work, The Voice of the
Silence, the latter. The Stanzas of Dzyan are of great antiquity,
she claimed, drawn from the Mani Koum-
______________
1 The word Dzyan presents some etymological difficulties. Madame Blavatsky in
the Glossary states that Dzyan (also written Dzyn and Dzen) is a
corruption of the Sanskrit Dhyana, meaning meditation. In Tibetan, learning is
called Dzin.
194
boum,2 or sacred script of the Dzungarians,3 in the north of Tibet. She is not
sure of their origin, but says she was permitted to memorize them during her
residence in the Forbidden Land. They show a close parallel with the Prajna
Paramita Sutras of Hindu sacred lore.
There are of course charges that she invented the Stanzas herself or
plagiarized them from some source. Max Müller is reported to have said that in
this matter she was either a remarkable forger or that she has made the most
valuable gift to archeological research in the Orient. She says herself in the
Preface:
"These truths are in no sense put forward as a revelation; nor does the
author claim the position of a revealer of mystic lore, now made public for the
first time in the world's history. For what is contained in this work is to be
found scattered throughout thousands of volumes embodying the scriptures of the
great Asiatic and early European religions, hidden under glyph and symbol, and
hitherto left unnoticed because of this veil. What is now attempted is to
gather the oldest tenets together and to make of them one harmonious and
unbroken whole. The sole advantage which the
______________
2 This document (spelled variously Koumboum, Kumbum, Kounboum, etc.) was a
Buddhist text connected with the Koumboum monastery, in Tibet. On the monastery
grounds grew the sacred Tree of Tibet, the 'tree of the ten thousand images,'
as Huc describes it. . . . "Tradition has it that it grew out of the hair
of Tsonka-pa, who was buried on that spot. . . . In the words of the Abbé Huc,
who lived several months with another missionary, named Gabet, near this
phenomenal tree: 'Each of its leaves in opening, bears either a letter or a
religious sentence, written in sacred characters, and these letters are, of
their kind, of such a perfection that the type-foundries of Didot contain
nothing to excel them. Open the leaves, which vegetation is about to unroll,
and you will there discover, on the point of appearing, the letters or the
distinct words which are the marvel of this unique tree. Turn your attention
from the plant to the bark of its branches, and new characters will meet your
eyes! Do not allow your interest to flag; raise the layers of this bark and still
other characters will show themselves below those whose beauty has
surprised you. For, do not fancy that these superposed layers repeat the same
printing. No, quite the contrary; for each lamina you lift presents to view its
distinct type. How, then, can we suspect jugglery? I have done my best in that
direction to discover the slightest trace of human trick, and my baffled mind
could not retain the slightest suspicion.' Yet promptly the kind French Abbé
suspects--the Devil."--Quoted from Madame Blavatsky, article Kounboum in The
Theosophical Glossary.
3 The Dzungarians were a section of the Mongolian Empire at its height, whose
name now remains only as the name of a mountain range. They have disappeared
geographically.
195
writer has over her predecessors, is that she need not resort to personal
speculation and theories. For this work is a partial statement of what she
herself has been taught by more advanced students, supplemented in a few
details only, by the results of her own study and observation."4
Near the end of her Introductory she printed in large type, quoting
Montaigne:
"I have here made only a nosegay of culled flowers, and have brought
nothing of my own but the string that ties them."
Then she adds:
"Pull the 'string' to pieces, if you will. As for the nosegay of facts--you
will never be able to make away with these. You can only ignore them and no
more."
In the Introductory she presents once more the thesis of esotericism as
the method used throughout former history for the preservation and propagation
of the precious deposit of the Ancient Wisdom. She affirms that under the
sandswept plains of Tibet, under many a desert of the Orient, cities lie buried
in whose secret recesses are stored away the priceless books that the despoiling
hands of the bigot would have tossed into the flames. Books which held the key
to thousands of others yet extant, she alleges, unaccountably disappeared from
view--but are not lost. There was a "primeval revelation," granted to
the fathers of the human race, and it still exists. Furthermore, it will
reappear. But unless one possesses the key, he will never unlock it, and the
profane world will search for it in vain. The Golden Legend traces its symbolic
pattern mysteriously through the warp and woof of the oldest literatures, but
only the initiated will see it. A strange prophecy is dropped as she passes on.
"The rejection of these teachings may be expected and must be accepted
beforehand. No one styling himself a 'scholar,' in whatever department of exact
science, will be permitted to regard these teachings seriously. They will be
derided and rejected a priori in this century; but only in this one. For in the
twentieth century of
______________
4 Page vii.
196
our era scholars will begin to recognize that the Secret Doctrine has neither
been invented nor exaggerated, but on the contrary, simply outlined; and
finally that its teachings antedate the Vedas."5
Her book is not the Secret Doctrine in its entirety, but a select number of
fragments of its fundamental tenets. But it will be centuries before much more
is given out. The keys to the Zodiacal Mysteries "must be turned seven
times before the whole system is divulged." One turn of the key was given
in Isis. Several turns more are given in The Secret Doctrine.
"The Secret Doctrine is not a treatise, or a series of vague theories, but
contains all that can be given out to the world in this century."6
She is to deal with the entire field of life, in all its manifestations,
cosmic, universal, planetary, earthly, and human. Omnipresent eternal life is
assumed as given, without beginning or end, yet periodical in its regular
manifestations. It is always in being for Itself, yet for us it comes into and
goes out of existence with periodical rhythm. Its one absolute attribute, which
is itself, is eternal causeless motion, called the "Great Breath."
Life eternal exhales and inhales, and this action produces the universes and
withdraws them. It is in regular and harmonious succession either passive or
active. These conditions are the "Days" and "Nights" of
Brahm, when, so to say, universal life is either awake or asleep. This
characteristic of the One Life stamps everything everywhere with the mark of an
analogous process. No work of Life is free from this law. It is the immutable
law of the All and of every part of the All. It is the universal law of Karma,
and makes reincarnation the method of life expression everywhere. Life swings
eternally back and forth between periods of activity and rest. Upon inaugurating
an active period after a "Night" of rest, life begins to expand, and
continues until it fills all space with cosmical
______________
5 The Secret Doctrine, Introductory, p. xxxvii.
6 Ibid., p. xxxviii.
197
creation; in turn, at the end of this activity, it contracts and withdraws all
the energy within itself. The Secret Doctrine is an account of the
activities of the One Life from the beginning of one of these periods of
reawakening to its end, treating the cosmic processes generally, and the earth
and human processes specifically. It is the cryptic story of how the universe
is created, whence it emanates, what Powers fashion it, whither it goes and
what it means.
The period of universal rest is known in esoteric circles as
"Pralaya,"7 the active period as a "Manvantara."8 A
description of the Totality of Things is nothing but an account of the Life
Force alternating, shuttle-like, between these two conditions.
The universe comes out of the Great Being and disappears into it. Life repeats
in any form it takes the metaphor of this process. It vacillates forever
between the opposite poles of Unity and Infinity, noumenon and phenomenon,
absoluteness and relativity, homogeneity and heterogeneity, reality and
appearance, the unconditional and the conditioned, the dimensionless and the
dimensioned, the eternal and the temporal. What Life is when not manifest to us
is as indescribable, as unthinkable as is space. The Absolute--God--is just
this Space. Space is neither a "limitless void" nor a "conditioned
fulness," but both. It appears void to finite minds, yet is the absolute
container of all that is. Where the universe goes when it dissolves--and still
remains in being--is where anything else goes when it dissolves,--into
solution. Not in a purely mechanical sense, yet that too. It goes from infinite
particularity back into the one genus, from form back to formlessness, from
differentiation back to homogeneity. Matter goes to bits, finer, finer, till it
is
______________
7 Pralaya, as given in Sanskrit dictionaries, means "dissolution,
reabsorption, destruction, annihilation, death"; especially the
destruction of the whole world at the end of a Kalpa; also "fainting, loss
of sense of consciousness; sleep." It apparently is derived from the
Sanskrit stem li, one of whose meanings is to disappear or vanish.
Madame Blavatsky describes Pralaya in the Glossary as "a period of
obscuration or repose--planetary, cosmic or universal--the opposite of
Manvantara."
8 Manvantara (Manu plus antara, between) is described as the period or age of a
Manu. It comprised a period of 4,320,000 human years, supposedly the period
intervening between two Manus.
198
held in solution in the infinite sea of pure Non-Being. It goes from actuality
to latency.
Occultism is the study of the worlds in their latent state; material science is
the study of the same worlds in their actual or manifest condition. Or, to use
Aristotelian terms, since no attributes can be predicated of pure potentiality,
matter is privation. Matter is sheer possibility, with no capacity but to be
acted upon, shaped, formed, impregnated. Nothing can be affirmed of it save
that it is, and even then it is not as matter, but the pure essence,
germ, or root of matter. It is just the Absolute, i.e., freed from all
marks of differentiation. Since nothing can be asserted of it, it is pure
negation, non-being. Absolute being, paradoxically, ultimately equals
non-being. Being has so far retreated from actuality that it ends in sheer
Be-ness. The eternal "dance of life" is a rhythmic movement of the
All from Be-ness to Being, through the path of Becoming. This brings us to the
famous three fundamentals of the Secret Doctrine, the three basic principles of
the Sacred Science. They are:
1. The Omnipresent, Eternal, Boundless and Immutable Principle, on which all
speculation is impossible--beyond the range and reach of thought--the One
Absolute Reality, Infinite Cause, the Unknowable, the Unmoved Mover and
Rootless Root of all--pure Be-ness--Sat. It is symbolized in esotericism under
two aspects, Absolute Space and Absolute Motion; the latter representing
unconditioned Consciousness. The impersonal reality of the cosmos is the pure
noumenon of thought. Parabrahm (Be-ness) is out of all relation to conditioned
existence. In Sanskrit, parabrahman means "the Supreme Spirit of
Brahma." Whenever the life of Parabrahm deploys into manifestation, it
assumes a dual aspect, giving rise to the "pairs of opposites," or
the polarities of the conditioned universe. The One Life splits into Spirit-Matter,
Subject-Object. The contrast and tension of these two aspects are essential to
hold the universes in manifestation. Without cosmic substance cosmic ideation
would not manifest as individual self-consciousness, since only through matter
can there be effected a focus of
199
this undifferentiated intelligence to form a conscious being. Similarly cosmic
matter apart from cosmic ideation, would remain an empty abstraction.
Madame Blavatsky here introduces the conception of a force whose function it is
to effect the linkage between spirit and matter. This is an energy named Fohat
(supposedly a Tibetan term), which becomes at once the solution of all
mind-body problems. It is the "bridge" by which the "Ideas"
existing in the Divine Intelligence are impressed on cosmic substance as the
"Laws of Nature." It is the Force which prescribes form to matter,
and gives mode to its activity. It is the agent of the formative intelligences,
the various sons of the various trinities, for casting the creations into forms
of "logical structure."
2. The periodical activity already noted, which makes Space the
"playground of numberless universes incessantly manifesting and
disappearing," the rhythmic pulse which causes "the appearance and
disappearance of worlds like a regular tidal ebb and flow." This second
fundamental affirms that absolute law of periodicity, of flux and reflux, which
physical science has noted and recorded in all departments of nature, and which
the old science termed the Law of Karma. It has been treated briefly above, and
a later chapter will trace its operations in nature more fully.
3. The identity and fundamental unity of all individual Souls with the
universal Over-Soul, the microcosm with the macrocosm. The history of the
individual or personalized Soul is thus of necessity a miniature or copy of the
larger life of the universe, a pilgrimage through the worlds of matter and
sense, under the cyclic karmic law,--"cycles of necessity" and
incarnation. In fact individual self-consciousness is only acquirable by the
Spirit, in its separated though still divine aspect--the Soul--by an
independent conscious existence that brings it in contact with every elementary
form of the phenomenal world. This demands of it a "descent into
matter" to its lowest and most inert forms, and a re-ascent through every
rising grade until immaterial conditions are once more attained. The road
downward and
200
upward is marked by seven steps, grades or planes of cosmic formation, on each
of which man acquires a nature and faculties consonant with the type of
structure of the atom there encountered. On the downward arc (or Involution, a
process unknown to modern science which deals only with Evolution), Life
undergoes at each step an increased degree of differentiation; and the naming
of the various potentialities emerging into potencies, gives us the dualities,
the trinities, the tetractys, and the numberless hierarchies of the ancient
Greeks and Orientals. The Gods, the Mothers-Fathers-Sons, Spirits, Logoi,
Elohim, Demiurges, Jehovahs, Pitris, Aeons, are but names of the Intelligent
Forces that are first emanated from the impregnated womb of time. The first
emanated principles are sexless, but sex is introduced (in symbolic form) as
soon as the dual polarization of Spirit-Matter takes place. The whole story of
the Cosmogenesis (Volume I) is a recital of the scheme according to which the
primal unity of unmanifest Being breaks up into differentiation and
multiformity and so fills space with conscious evolving beings.
Thus the three fundamentals express respectively the Be-ness, the Becoming, and
the Being of the everlasting That, which is Life.
The First Stanza describes the state of the Absolute during Pralaya, the
"Night of Brahm," when nothing is in existence, but everything only is.
Such a description can obviously be only a grouping of symbolisms. The only fit
symbol of the Absolute is darkness, "brooding over the face of the
deep" (Space). It is the night of Life, and all Nature sleeps. The worlds
were not. The only description is privative. Time was not; mind was not;
"the seven ways to bliss," or the evolutionary paths, were not; the
"causes of misery," of the worlds of illusion, were not; even the
hierarchies who would direct the "new wheel," were not. The first
differentiation of the That, viz., Spirit, had not been made.
("That" is a reminiscence of the phrase tat tvam asi "that
[i.e., the All] thou art," found in the Indian Upanishads.) Matter
was not; but only its formless essence.
201
Nature had thus slept for "seven eternities," however they may have
been registered in a timeless consciousness; for time was not, since there was
no differentiation, hence no succession. Mind was not, having no organ to
function through. All was noumenon. The Great Breath, on whose outgoing energy
worlds sprang into existence, had not yet gone forth. The universe was a blank;
metaphysics had not begun to generate physics; the universe held in solution
had not yet begun to precipitate into crystallization. All life was hidden in
the formless embrace of the protyle, or primal substance. Darkness is the
"Father of Lights," but the Son had not yet been born. When day
dawns, Father (Spirit) and Mother (Substance) unite to beget their Son, who
will then cleave the Cimmerian darkness and issue forth to flood all space.
Stanza II continues the description of the sleeping universe, pointing,
however, to the signs of reawakening. "The hour had not yet struck; the
ray had not yet flashed into the germ; the mother-lotus had not yet
swollen." From the darkness soon would issue the streak of dawn, splitting
open by its light and warmth the shell of each atom of virgin matter, and
letting issue thence the Seven Creators, who will fashion the universe. In the
Mundane Egg the germ of life was deposited from the preceding Manvantaras, and
the Divine Energy, brooding over it for aeons, caused it to hatch out its brood
of new worlds. In immaterial form within the germ dwelt the archetypal ideas,
the (Platonic) memories of former experiences, which will determine the form of
the new structures as the Divine Architects of the worlds. All things on earth
are but patterns of things in the heavens; spiritual ideas crystallized into
concretion on the plane of manifestation--"sermons in stones." The
lotus is the symbol of esoteric teaching because its seed contains a miniature
of the future plant, and because, like man, it lives in three worlds, the mud
(material), the water (typifying the emotional), and the air (spiritual).
Creation starts with incubation. The Cosmic Egg must be fertilized ere it can
be hatched. A ray, or first emanation,
202
from the Darkness opens the womb of the Mother (Primal Substance), and it then
emanates as three, Father-Mother-Son, which, with the energy of Fohat makes the
quaternary. Thus occultism explains all the mysteries of the trinity and the
Immaculate Conception. The first dogma of Occultism is universal unity under
three aspects. The Son was born from virgin (i.e., unproductive,
unfertilized) matter (Root Substance, the Mother), when the latter was
fecundated by the Father (Spirit).
The archetypal ideas do not imply a Divine Ideator, nor the Divine Thought a
Divine Thinker. The Universe is Thought itself, reflected in a manifested
material. But the Universe is the product, or "Son," which during the
prologue of the drama of the creation lies buried in the Divine Thought. The
latter has "not yet penetrated unto the Divine Bosom."
Stanza III rings with the concluding vibrations of the seventh eternity as they
thrill through boundless space, sounding the cock-crow of a new Manvantaric
daybreak. The Mother (Substance) swells, expanding from within. The vibration
sweeps along, impregnating the quiescent germs of life in the whole expanse.
Darkness gives out light; light drops into virgin matter, opening every bud.
Divine Intelligence impregnates chaos. The germs float together into the
World-Egg, the ancient symbol of Nature fructified. The aggravation of units of
matter under the impulse of dynamic spirit is symbolized by the term "curdling."
Pure Spirit curdles pure matter into the incipient granules of hyle, or
substance.
The serpent symbol is prominent in the early cosmology, typifying at different
times the eternity, infinitude, regeneration and rejuvenation of the universe,
and also wisdom. The familiar serpent with its tail in its mouth was a symbol
not only of eternity and infinitude, but of the globular form of all bodies
shaped out of the fire mist. In general the "fiery serpent"
represented the movement of Divine Wisdom over the face of the waters, or
primary elements.
The text of the whole doctrine of the early stages, in fact, of the entire
creative process, is the statement
203
"that there is but One Universal Element, infinite, unborn and undying,
and that all the rest--as the world of phenomena--are but so many various
differentiated aspects and transformations of that One, from Cosmical down to
micro-cosmical effects, from superhuman down to human and sub-human beings, the
totality in short of objective existence."9
Naturally but one tiny segment of all that activity is cognizable by man, whose
perceptive powers are limited to a small range of vibratory sensitivity. Only
that part of nature which comes within hail of his sense equipment, only the
expressions of life which take physical form, are known (directly) to him. Were
it not, says Theosophy, for the fact that superhuman beings, whose cognitive
powers have been vastly extended beyond ordinary human capacity, have imparted
to those qualified to receive it information relative to the upper worlds and
the inner realities of nature, we would know nothing of cosmology.
"In order to obtain clear perception of it, one has first of all to admit
the postulate of a universally diffused, omnipresent, eternal Deity in Nature; secondly,
to have fathomed the meaning of electricity in its true essence; and thirdly,
to credit man with being a septenary symbol, on the terrestrial plane, of the
One Great Unit, (the Logos), which is itself the seven-vowelled sign, the
Breath, crystallized into the Word."10
Madame Blavatsky starts with the Absolute, the All-That-Is, not even the One,
but the No-Number.
In Stanza IV we see this primordial essence awakening to activity. It emanates
or engenders the One, the homogeneous substrate of all. It in turn projects or
splits itself into the Two, Father-Mother, and these, interacting, produce the
"Sons" or Rays, who by their word of power, the "Army of the
Voice" (the laws of nature), build the worlds of the universe. These sons
are always seven in number, and their created works are thus given a seven-fold
constitution. Christians know them as the Seven Logoi, or the Seven
______________
9 The Secret Doctrine, Vol. I, p. 75.
10 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 83.
204
Archangels. These carry the differentiation of the one cosmic substrate to its
furthest extent in the production of the ninety-two or more elements of our
globe, which their forces weld into an infinity of combinations to compose our
structural earth. All the physical forces we know, light, heat, cold, fire,
water, gas, earth, ether, are the progeny of the great universal agent, Fohat,
which we know under its form of electricity. Electricity is the universal agent
employed by the Sons of God to create and uphold our world.
In bold outline this is the whole story. But Madame Blavatsky supplies a wealth
of detail and a richness of illustration that go far to clarify the various
phases of the process and the diversified agents coöperating in it.
When the One has created the Two--Spirit and Matter--the allegory goes on to
say, the interaction of these Two "spin a web whose upper end is fastened
to Spirit and the lower one to Matter." This web is the universe, ranging
in constituent elements from coarse matter up to vibrant Spirit. Yet Spirit and
Matter are but two phases of one and the same Prime Element.
Cosmic Fire, Fohat, Divine Electricity, energizes the universe. But to the
natural concept of electricity the occult science adds the property of
intelligence. Cerebration is attended by electrical phenomena, it is said.
Humanity is a materialized and as yet imperfect expression of the seven
hierarchical Devas, or the seven conscious intelligent powers in nature. The
planetary deities, or the planets as living beings, are fundamental in the
Theosophic view, as to the Aristotelian and ancient Greek view generally.
Mankind is but repeating the history of precedent life units, which have risen
to celestial heights and magnitudes.
The forms of created life are all determined by the geometrical forms in the
minds of the Intelligences. "Nature geometrizes universally in all her
manifestations." There is an inherent law by which nature coördinates or
correlates all her geometrical forms, and her compound elements; and in it
there is no room for chance. The worlds are all subject
205
to Rulers or Regents, and the apparent deviations from precise natural programs
are due to voluntary actions on the part of those great Beings who, like
ourselves, are in the cycle of experience and evolution. The Solar Logoi can
err in their spheres as we in ours. Some of the exceptional oddities in nature
are the effects of their efforts to experiment and learn.
The "Lipika" ("scribes") "write" the eternal
records of nature on the imperishable scroll of the Akashic ether. They are the
"amanuenses of the Eternal Ideation," who copy the archetypal ideas
and imprint them on the material substance. They write the Book of Eternal Life
and exercise an influence on the science of horoscopy.
Stanza V elaborates in more detail the creative process, controlled by the
various "sevens," the "Breaths" (prana, basic
category in Indian philosophy) and the "Sons." The Doctrine teaches
that to become a fully conscious divine "god," the spiritual primeval
Intelligence must pass through the human stage. And "human" in this
usage is not limited to the humanity of our globe, but applies also to the
numberless other mortal incarnations of varying types on other planets. A human
state is one in which Intelligence is embodied in a condition of material
organization in which there is established an equilibrium between matter and
spirit,--and this state is reached in the middle point of the Fourth Round on
each chain of globes, or when spirit is most deeply enmeshed in matter, and is
ready to begin its emergence. The hierarchical entities must have won for
themselves the right of divinity through self-experience, as we are doing.
"The 'Breath' or first emanation becomes a stone, the stone a plant, the
plant an animal, the animal a man, the man a spirit and the spirit a god."
All the great planetary gods were once men, and we men shall in the future take
our places in the skies as Lords of planets, Regents of galaxies and wielders
of fire-mist! As our human wills (the divine elements in us) are now masters over
small potencies, so our expanded Intelligences will direct vast elemental
energies, and worlds will arise under the impulsion of our thought. There is
room in
206
space for us all. The "flaming fire" (electricity) shall be our
minister, to flash at our bidding. The "fiery wind" is the
incandescent cosmic dust which follows the impulsion of the will as iron
filings follow a magnet. Yet this cosmic dust is "mind-stuff," has
the potentiality of self-consciousness in it, and is, like the Monad of
Leibnitz, a universe in itself and for itself. "It is an atom and an
angel." Fohat is the universal fiery agent of Divine Will, and the
electricity we know is one aspect, not by any means the highest, of it. In a
higher state Fohat is the "objectivized thought of the gods," the
Word made flesh. In another aspect he is the Universal Life Force, solar
energy. He is said to take "three and seven strides through the seven
regions above and the seven below," which is taken to mean the successive
waves of vital force impregnating the seven levels of nature. "God is a
living Fire,"--the Christians are fire-worshippers, too, says Madame
Blavatsky. God is the One Flame. It burns within every material thing. The
ultimate essence of each constituent part of the compounds of nature is
unitary, whether in the spiritual, the intellectual or the physical world.
In order that the One may become the many, there must be a principium
individuationis, and this is provided by the qualities of matter. A spark
of Divine Fire, so to speak, is wrapped in a vesture of matter, which
circumscribes the energies of spirit with a "Ring Pass-Not." Each
embodied Monad or Spiritual Ego looks out through its sense windows to perceive
another Ego; but perceives only the material garment of that Ego. The process
of evolution will make this garment thinner, so that the inner splendor of the
Self can be seen luminously through it.
The fiery energy of the great planetary beings, our author says, will never
"run down," as it is constantly being fed by intra-cosmic fuel, a
theory which Prof. Millikan has made familiar in recent days.
Stanza VI carries out the further stages of differentiation of the life
principle in its first or virgin forms. Man's physical body is but one of seven
constituents of his being, and a planet likewise presents only its outer
garment, its physical
207
vehicle, to our view. The stars, as beings, are septenary, having astral,
mental, and spiritual bodies in addition to their physical globes. It is
affirmed that this septiform constitution of man, which makes him an analogue
of the great cosmic beings and of the cosmos itself, is to be taken as the true
significance of the Biblical phrase "man, the image and likeness of
God." The more real or more spiritual essences of the being of both man
and stars are not visible to sense. The life impulsion animating man contacts
the material world only in and through his physical body; the same thing is
true of the chain of globes. Both man and the planet have one physical body on
the material plane, two on the vital etheric plane, two on the mental plane,
and two on the upper plane of spirit. The latter two are beyond the powers of
human ken, and to us are material only in the sense that they are not entirely
devoid of differentiation. They are still vestures of spirit, not spirit
itself. But they are the first garments of "pure" spirit. A life
wave, in man or planet, comes forth from spirit, enters one after the other the
bodies of increasing material density, until it has descended to a perfect
equilibrium between matter and spirit, in the gross physical or fourth body;
and then begins its ascent through three other vehicles of increasingly tenuous
organization. And it runs seven times round each cycle of bodies and dwells for
milliards of years in each of the seven kingdoms of nature, the mineral,
vegetable, animal, and human, and three sub-mineral kingdoms of an elementary
character, not known to science. The waves of life pass successively from one
globe to another, lifting one into active existence as another goes
"dead." They traverse the seven globes of a chain like a great spiral
serpent, revolving like a barber's pole, every turn of the axis carrying a
kingdom of nature one stride higher. For instance, hitting Globe A of the chain
the impulsion builds up the mineral kingdom there; as this first wave swings
onward to Globe B (where it builds the mineral kingdom for it) the second
impulsion hits Globe A and lifts the mineral kingdom erected by the previous
wave into the vegetable evolution. As the first wave leaps over from Globe
208
B to Globe C, to start mineral life there, the second wave has brought the
vegetable kingdom to Globe B, and the animal kingdom on Globe A. The fourth
outgoing of force will introduce the mineral world on Globe D, the vegetable on
Globe C, the animal on Globe B, and the human on Globe A. After the human come
the superhuman or spiritual evolutions. The detailed explanation of the entire
cycle of birth, growth, life, and death of solar systems is of such complexity
that it is the work of years for the Theosophic student to grasp it with any
clearness. It is immensely involved, so that charts and graphs are generally
resorted to. The student is referred to standard Theosophic works for the
minutiae of this subject. We can but note here the principles of the system and
some of their implications.
The earth, as the one visible representative of its six invisible principles,
has to live through seven Rounds. The first three take it through the process
of materialization; the fourth fully crystallizes it, hardens it; the last
three take it gradually out of physical, back to ethereal and finally spiritual
form. The Fourth Globe of each chain is thus always the nadir of the process of
involution, and the Fourth Round is always the time in which this process is
consummated. The earth is now a little past the nethermost point of material
existence, as we have passed the middle of the Fourth Round. We have finished
the descending arc and have begun our return to Deity, both the globe and the
human family on it. Exiles from God, prodigal sons in a far country, we have
set out on our homeward journey.
Man came on our globe at the beginning of the Fourth Round in the present
series of life cycles and races, following the evolution of the mineral,
vegetable, and animal kingdoms thereon. Every life cycle on our earth brings
into being seven Root Races. The First Root Race were the progeny of
"celestial men," or the Lunar Pitris,11 of which again there are
seven hierarchies.
______________
11 The word Pitris commonly means "fathers, ancestors, progenitors."
Madame Blavatsky, however, on the authority of her Mahatmic instructors,
employs the term in a wider sense. She uses it in a racial sense. In the Glossary
she speaks of the Pitris as "the ancestors or creators of mankind.
They are of the seven classes, three
209
Human Egos continue to come into the stream of our evolution on earth up to the
Fourth Round. But at this point the door into the human kingdom closes. Those
Monads who have not reached the human kingdom by this time will find themselves
so far behind that they will have to wait over, in a state of suspended
vitality, until the next wave bears them onward. But for their loss of
opportunity on this chain they will be rewarded by becoming men on a higher
chain altogether.
The hosts of Monads are divided into three classes: Lunar Pitris, present Men,
and the laggards. The first class are advanced Egos who reached
"Manhood" in the First Round. The laggards are those who come in last,
and are still in an undeveloped state.
The Moon is the parent of our Earth--and this in spite of the fact that it is
our satellite. It is older, and its spirit has passed from its now lifeless
body into our planet. In brief, the Earth is the new body or reincarnation of
the Moon,--or more correctly, of that great Spirit which tenanted the Moon
aeons ago. Madame Blavatsky uses the apt illustration of a mother circling
around her child's cradle, to vindicate the anomaly of a parent body in a
satellitic relation to its offspring.
There exists in nature a triple evolutionary scheme, or three separate schemes
of evolution, which proceed contemporaneously in our system and are
inextricably interblended at every point. These are the Monadic, the
intellectual, and the physical. Here again analogy steps in to clarify thought.
As man is a Monad, or spark of the Infinite Essence, which is evolving in
connection both with a principle of mind and a physical body, so nature is a
combination of three streams of development. The higher part must find its way
to growth through connection with the lower and
______________
of which are incorporeal. In popular theology they are said to be created from
Brahma's side. . . . The Pitris are not the ancestors of the present living
men, but those of the human kind or Adamic races; the spirits of the human
races, which on the great scale of descending evolution preceded our races of
men, and they were physically, as well as spiritually, far superior to our
modern pigmies. In Manava Dharma Shastra they are called the Lunar
Ancestors."
210
the lowest. But each of these three evolutions has its own laws, and the
interconnection of them all in man makes him the complex being he is. Every
speck of matter strives to reach its model in man; and every man aspires to be
a self-conscious Monad.
Out of this assertion of a threefold nature in man grows one of the unique
conceptions of Theosophy: that Man, a divine spiritual Monad, is in this
evolution dwelling in and controlling (if he has learned how to prevent it
controlling him) the body of an animal. And the body is the animal's, not
man's, in the strict sense. The body has its own type of consciousness, primal
urgings, its own independent soul, but no intellect or spiritual nature. Through
its association with us in the same house it is supposed to develop in a way it
could never do unaided, first a mind and later the inkling of spirituality. But
every organism has its principle, and the soul of the animal is capable of
attending to those functions which pertain to the life of the body. Hence, the
commonplace functions of our bodies are regulated by a cerebration which is so
far from being directly our own that we are at any rate totally unconscious of
it. This amounts to saying that our subconscious, or the operations of our
sympathetic, as distinguished from our cerebral, nervous system, is the
"soul" of our animal mate. The hope of the animal lies in his fairly
ready susceptibility to training, so that he is able quickly to take up by an
automatism whatever "we" do habitually.
Theosophy affirms that man has to control, not his own lower nature, but a
lower order of being whose body he is tenanting.
Theosophists point to the development of a child as corroborative of this
theory. Before mind develops, the child is an animal simply. Later comes
intellect, and after more time comes spirituality. Man is not simple; he is a
congeries of individuals in association. As the individual's unfoldment in his
own life is a recapitulation of the growth of humanity as a unit, it follows
the same order of evolution. The great Creative Lords did not implant the
principle of mind in our
211
order until, in the Fourth Race, appropriate bodies had been built up. We are
only now beginning to evolve spiritual faculty.
The so-called Fall "was the fall of Spirit into generation, not the fall
of mortal man." Madame Blavatsky undertakes to show that on this point of
theology, as on that of the Virgin Birth, Christian doctrine is childishly
literal-minded. It has taken a fact of cosmology, which like all others in
ancient thought had been symbolized in various forms, and rendered it in a
literal historical sense. The "Falls" are but phases of the universal
"descent into matter," which appears under several aspects, one being
the general outgoing of spirit into the material worlds, another the "fall
of the angels" and a third the "fall of man." The taint of
sexuality associated with certain conceptions of man's fall is a reference to
the fact that when the spiritual Monads who descended to earth to inhabit the
bodies of a lower race (the animals spoken of above), they were of necessity
forced into sexual procreation, whereas they had propagated by powers of the
intellectualized will in their previous high estate.
Then in regard to the Satans, the Serpents, the Dragons, the Devils, the
Demons, the Demiurges, the Adversaries, Madame Blavatsky delves deep into
ancient lore to prove that, when read properly in their esoteric meaning, all
the old legends of the Evil Ones, the Powers of Darkness, refer to no
essentially evil beings, great or small, but to the Divine Wisdom of the Sons
of Light (all light emanates from darkness) who impregnate the universe with
the principle of intelligence. Adam's eating of the fruit of the forbidden tree
gave him knowledge of good and evil. This can mean only that beings of a
"pure" spiritual nature represented symbolically by resident life in
Eden or Paradise, sought, through incarnation in physical bodies in a material
world, the opportunity to bring the latent intelligence in their divine nature
to actualization in self-conscious knowledge. Dragons are always found guarding
a tree--the tree of knowledge.
"When the Church, therefore, curses Satan, it curses the cosmic reflection
of God; it anathematizes God made manifest in matter
212
or in the objective; it maledicts God, or the ever-incomprehensible Wisdom,
revealing itself as Light and Shadow, good and evil in nature in the only
manner comprehensible to the limited intellect of man."12
"Satan, once he ceases to be viewed in the superstitious dogmatic
unphilosophical spirit of the Churches, grows into the grandiose image of one
who made of terrestrial a divine Man; who gave him . . . the law of the Spirit
and Life and made him free from the sin of ignorance, hence of death."13
All references to Satan stood for an aspect of nature that was evil only as the
negative pole of electricity is evil, i.e., as it stands in opposition
to the positive, a necessary and benignant phase of activity. "Deus est
Demon inversus."
The globes, or their constituent matter, go through seven fundamental
transformations in their life history: (1), the homogeneous; (2), the aëriform
and radiant (gaseous); (3), curd-like (nebulous); (4), atomic, ethereal (beginning
of differentiation); (5), germinal, fiery; (6), vapory (the future Earth); (7),
cold, depending on the sun for life.
When the worlds are populated and the Monads have entered the human chain,
certain great beings who have risen to knowledge on other chains supervise the
instruction of the oncoming races, keeping closely in touch with the spiritual
condition of the unenlightened masses. Either they themselves descend into the
world or they send forth lesser teachers to keep alive the seed of spiritual
wisdom. Kapila, Hermes, Enoch, Orpheus, Krishna were a few of their emissaries.
They voluntarily forego their own higher evolution, at least temporarily,
"to form the nursery for future human adepts," during the rest of our
cycle.
Stanza VII goes into the numerology of the primal and later hierarchies, and
gives the inner cosmological significance of the numbers. Two, of course,
symbolizes the polarization of original essence into the duality of
Spirit-Matter. Three refers to the triune constitution of the Divine Men, or
Planetary Beings, who manifest the union of the three
______________
12 The Secret Doctrine, Vol. II, p. 235.
13 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 198.
213
highest principles, Atma-Buddhi-Manas,14 in one organism. Man on his plane
reflects this trinitarian union. The quaternaries represent the cardinal points
which square the circle of infinity and typify manifestation. Four sometimes
also stands for the basic states of elementary essence, or the four perceptible
planes of material existence, earth, water, air, and ether. Five is the symbol
of man in his present stage of evolutionary development, as he stands in the
fifth lap of his progression round the spiral, and has consequently developed
five of his ultimate seven capacities. This accounts for his having five
senses, five fingers and toes. The pentacle or five-pointed star is often his
symbol. The six-pointed star refers to the six forces or powers of nature, all
synthesized by the seventh or central point in the star. Seven is, of course,
the number of life in its final form of organization on the material plane.
This is because the Logoi created man in their own septenary image. Man is
really, in his totality, a sevenfold being, or a being made up of the union of
seven distinct constituent parts. His threefold nature is a truth for his
present status only. He is sevenfold potentially, threefold actually. This
means that of his seven principles only the lower three have been brought from
latency to activity, as he is engaged in awakening to full function his fourth
or Buddhic principle. At the far-off summit of his life in the seventh Round he
will have all his seven principles in full flower, and will be the divine man
he was before--only now conscious of his divinity. At the end of each Round,
"when the seventh globe is reached the nature of everything that is
evolving returns to the condition it was in at its starting point--
______________
14 The term Atma-Buddhi-Manas is the Theosophical manner of designating the
"higher triplicity" in man, the union of the three higher principles
which constitutes him an individual Ego. If one were to say, man is composed of
mind, soul and spirit in his higher nature, it would roughly approximate the
Theosophic description. Sanskrit dictionaries give Atma as meaning,
"breath, life, soul"; Buddhi as meaning "intelligence,
reason, intellect, mind, discernment, judgment, the power of forming and
retaining conceptions and general notions; perception, apprehension,
understanding"; and Manas as "the principle of mind or spirit."
214
plus, every time, a new and superior degree in the states of
consciousness."15
The theory of an inner permanent unit of life, repeatedly touching the outer
material worlds in order to gain experience, is symbolized in Theosophy by the
Sutratma ("thread-soul"), or string of pearls. The permanent life
principle is the thread running through all, and the successive generations in
matter are the beads strung along it.
To understand these postulations, we must envisage man as dwelling only partially
in the physical embodiment, and having segments of his constitution in the
invisible worlds. In the latter lies the ground-plan of his earth life, shaped
by his previous life histories. The present physical life will contribute its
quota of influence to modify that ground-plan when it becomes in turn the
determinant of his succeeding incarnation.
The Sabbath, according to Madame Blavatsky, has an occult significance
undreamed of by our theologians. It means the rest of Nirvana, and refers to
the seventh or final Round of each emanation through the planes of nature. But
the Sabbath should be as long as the days of activity.
A passage in a footnote says that the introductory chapters of Genesis
were never meant to represent even a remote allegory of the creation of our
earth. They
"embrace a metaphysical conception of some indefinite period in the
eternity, when successive attempts were being made by the law of evolution at
the formation of universes. The idea is plainly stated in the Zohar."16
Had its purpose been to give the true genesis, the narrative would have
followed the outline laid down in The Secret Doctrine. The creation in
which Adam Kadmon ("Primal Man") has a part, did not take place on
our earth, but in the depths of primordial matter.
The theory is adduced that each Round of the emanational wave of life engenders
one of the four elements, of which
______________
15 The Secret Doctrine, Vol. I, p. 103.
16 Ibid., p. 246.
215
the Greeks spoke so much. The First Round developed one element,
"one-dimensional space," fiery energy. The Second Round brought forth
the second element, air. Matter in the Second Round was two-dimensional. The
Third Round brought water, and the Fourth produced earth in its hard encrusted
state. The Fifth will beget ether, the gross body of the immaterial Akasha.17
The senses of man in that distant day will be refined to the point at which
responsiveness to ethereal vibrations will be general. Our range of cognition
will be thus vastly enhanced, for whole realms of nature's life now closed to
us because of our low pitch of faculty, will then be opened up. Phenomena
manifesting the permeability of matter will be to our higher senses then a
daily commonplace. We will have X-ray vision, so that we shall be able "to
see into the heart of things."
If man's nature is sevenfold, so is his evolution. The seven principles in him
are enumerated as "the Spiritual or Divine; the psychic or semi-divine;
the intellectual; the passional; the instinctual or cognitional; the semi-corporeal;
and the purely material or physical. All these evolve and progress cyclically,
passing from one into another . . . one in their ultimate essence, seven in
their aspects."
An important point is made by the expounder of Occultism as to the way in which
we should think of all spirits in the supersensible and the sub-sensible
worlds. Those superior to us have all been men, whether in this or former
evolutions on other globes or in other Manvantaras; and those below us, the
elementaries, nature spirits, will be men in the future. If a spirit has
intelligence he must have got it in the human stage, where alone that principle
is developed. Spirits are not to be regarded as exotic products of nature,
beings of a
______________
17 "The fourth dimension of space" enters the discussion at this
point. The phrase should be, says the writer, "the fourth dimension of
matter in space," since obviously space has no dimensions. The dimensions,
or characteristics of matter are those determinations which the five senses of
man give to it. Matter has extension, color, motion (molecular), taste, and
smell; and it is the development of the next sense in man--normal
clairvoyance--that will give matter its sixth characteristic, which she calls
permeability. Extension--which covers all concepts of dimension in our
world--is limited to three directions. Only when man's perceptive faculties
unfold will there be a real fourth dimension.
216
foreign universe, creatures of a type unrelated to ourselves. They are either
our lower or our higher brothers.
"The whole order of nature evinces a progressive march toward a higher
life. There is design in the action of the seemingly blindest forces. The whole
process of evolution with its endless adaptations, is a proof of this."18
All nature is animated and controlled by lofty Intelligences, who could not be
supposed to act with less of conscious design than ourselves. Design is
exhibited everywhere in the universe, in proportion to the degree of
intelligence evolved. There is no blind chance in the cosmos, but only varying
grades of intelligence. The laws of nature are inviolable, but individual
beings of every grade of intelligence move and act amid those laws, learning
gradually to bring their actions into harmony with them. The deus implicitus
within each of us--in every atom--must become the deus explicitus, and
the difficulties and risks of the process are commensurate with its glorious
rewards.
Some of these Intelligences are veritable genii who preside over our lives.
They are our good or evil demons. Hermes says
"they imprint their likeness on our souls, they are present in our nerves,
our marrow, our veins and our very brain substance. At the moment when each of
us receives life and being he is taken in charge by the genii (Elementals) who
preside over births. . . . The genii have then the control of mundane things
and our bodies serve them as instruments."19
Part II of Book One begins with an analysis of the evolution of Symbolism. No
traditional folk lore, according to Madame Blavatsky, has ever been pure
fiction; it represented a natural form of primitive language. Ideography was a
stage of growth in the art of human communication. Symbolism was no mere
intellectual device of idealistic algebra, but a natural idiom of thought. Mythology
was a primitive pictographic mode of conveying truths. An ideograph could be
understood "in any language."
______________
18 The Secret Doctrine, Vol. I, p. 277.
19 Quoted in The Secret Doctrine, Vol. I, p. 295.
217
A later development of this art brought the mystery language, or particular set
of symbols to represent the esoteric truths. The cross, the lamb, the bull, the
hawk, the serpent, the dragon, the sword, the circle, the square, the triangle,
and many other signs were adopted for special significances. There are seven
keys, however, to the mystery tongue, and some of them, as well as the
knowledge of how to turn them, have been lost. Only in Tibet, it is maintained,
is the code still intact. No religion was ever more than a chapter or two of
the entire volume of archaic mysteries. No system except Eastern Occultism was
ever in possession of the full secret, with its seven keys.
There is a chapter on the Mundane Egg, which in all theologies is taken to
represent the prototype of life hidden in the lotus symbol. Here we find a
special sacredness attributed to the letter M, as symbolizing water, i.e.,
waves, or the great deep, the sea of prime substance. And such sacred names as
Maitreya, Makara, Messiah, Metis, Mithras, Monad, Maya, Mother, Minerva, Mary,
Miriam and others are said to carry the hidden significance of the letter. The
Moon and its place in symbolism is the subject of a chapter. All the lunar
goddesses had a dual aspect, the one divine, the other infernal. All were the
virgin mothers of an immaculately born Son,--the sun. Here, as nearly
everywhere else, Christian dogmas and terms are traced to an origin in pagan
ideas. The Satan myth is again taken up in a separate chapter, where it is said
that the only diabolical thing about it are its perversions under Christian
handling.
The Sevens are given more thorough elucidation in another chapter. There were
seven creations, or rather creation had seven stages. The first was that of the
Divine Mind, Universal Soul, Infinite Intellect; the second was the first
differentiation of indiscrete Substance; the third was the stage of organic
evolution. These three steps were sub-mineral, and had yet brought nothing
visible to being. The fourth brought the minerals; the fifth brought animals,
in germ form; the sixth produced sub-human divinities, and the seventh
218
crowned the work with man. Man is thus the end and apex of the evolutionary
effort. Man completes all forms in himself. But esoterically there is a primary
creation and a secondary creation, and each is sevenfold. The first created
Spirit, the second Matter.
Madame Blavatsky traces the working of the septenates in nature through many
forms not commonly thought of. Many normal and abnormal processes have one or
more weeks (seven days) as their period, such as the gestation of animals, the
duration of fevers, etc. "The eggs of the pigeon are hatched in two weeks;
those of the fowl in three; those of the duck in four; those of the goose in
five; and those of the ostrich in seven." We are familiar with the
incidence of seven in many aspects of physics, in color, in sound, the
spectrum; in chemistry, in the law of atomic weights; in physiology; in nature.
Madame Blavatsky cites a long list of the occurrence of the mystic number in
the ceremonials, cosmologies, architecture, and theologies of all nations.
Scientific authorities are adduced by the author to corroborate her contention
that the material universe is ordered on a system which has seven as its
constitutional groundplan.
"The birth, growth, maturity, vital functions . . . change, diseases,
decay, and death, of insects, reptiles, fishes, birds, mammals and even of man,
are more or less controlled by a law of completion in weeks," or seven day
periods.20
From the seven colors of the rainbow to the seven-year climacterics in man's
life and his allotted seven decades on earth, all the living universe seems to
run in sevens and reflects the sevenfold nature of the precosmic patterns of
things.
Volume II concerns the planetary history of our earth, the inception of human
life on it, and the evolution of the latter through the previous races up to
now. Humanity is assigned an age on the globe of infinitely greater length than
______________
20 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 311. Quoted from H. Grattan Guinness, F. R. G. S.: The
Approaching End of the Age.
219
the science of her day was willing to concede, which even outstretches the
ampler figures set down by contemporary science.
We must start with the earth's place in the solar cosmos. As will be recalled,
our planet is the one physically perceptible (to ordinary human vision) globe
of a chain of seven (the six others being of rarefied impalpable materials),
this chain being itself but one of seven, each of which has a physica